World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
76
Citations
17480
World Ranking
1161
National Ranking
601

Philip W. Tucker publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip W. Tucker sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 215 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Philip W. Tucker D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip W. Tucker sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip W. Tucker is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research primarily centers on health professions, with a focus on experimental and cognitive psychology, general health professions, and radiological and ultrasound technology.

The researcher's work extensively covers topics such as sleep and work-related fatigue, workplace health and well-being, and occupational health and safety research. These topics reflect a multidisciplinary approach to understanding factors affecting worker health and performance.

Recent publications by Philip W. Tucker include the following:

  • Scientific challenges of studying shift schedule design (2022) in Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health
  • Using the Law to Seek PFAS Damage Recovery (2025) in Opflow
  • Quick Returns: A Quasi-Experimental Field Study on the Effects on Sleep, Fatigue and Cognitive Performance (2025) in Journal of Sleep Research

Their frequent co-authors are Kenneth A. Sansone, Kristin Öster, Marie Söderström, John Axelsson, and Göran Kecklund, indicating collaboration with experts in related fields.

Philip W. Tucker's research has appeared in various scientific outlets, including:

  • Scandinavian Journal of Work Environment & Health
  • Opflow
  • Journal of Sleep Research

The concentration on health professions and associated subfields suggests a strong interdisciplinary foundation, linking cognitive and experimental psychology to practical occupational health and safety concerns.

Best Publications

  • Limited diversity of γδ antigen receptor genes of thy-1+ dendritic epidermal cells

    David M. Asarnow;William A. Kuziel;Mark Bonyhad;Robert E. Tigelaar

  • Developmental and species-divergent globin switching are driven by BCL11A

    Vijay G. Sankaran;Jian Xu;Tobias Ragoczy;Gregory C. Ippolito

  • Foxp1 is an essential transcriptional regulator of B cell development

    Hui Hu;Bin Wang;Madhuri Borde;Julie Nardone;Julie Nardone

  • Identification and characterization of Smyd2: a split SET/MYND domain-containing histone H3 lysine 36-specific methyltransferase that interacts with the Sin3 histone deacetylase complex

    Mark A Brown;Robert J Sims;Robert J Sims;Paul D Gottlieb;Philip W Tucker

  • Hox repertoires for motor neuron diversity and connectivity gated by a single accessory factor, FoxP1.

    Jeremy S. Dasen;Jeremy S. Dasen;Alessandro De Camilli;Bin Wang;Philip W. Tucker

  • Monoclonal antibodies isolated without screening by analyzing the variable-gene repertoire of plasma cells

    Sai T. Reddy;Xin Ge;Aleksandr E. Miklos;Randall A Hughes

  • The BCL11 gene family: involvement of BCL11A in lymphoid malignancies.

    Ed Satterwhite;Takashi Sonoki;Tony G. Willis;Lana Harder

  • Foxp2 and Foxp1 cooperatively regulate lung and esophagus development.

    Weiguo Shu;Min Min Lu;Yuzhen Zhang;Philip W. Tucker

  • Correction of sickle cell disease in adult mice by interference with fetal hemoglobin silencing.

    Jian Xu;Cong Peng;Vijay G. Sankaran;Vijay G. Sankaran;Zhen Shao

  • The immunoglobulin heavy-chain matrix-associating regions are bound by Bright: a B cell-specific trans-activator that describes a new DNA-binding protein family.

    Richard F. Herrscher;Mark Kaplan;Mark Kaplan;David L. Lelsz;Chhaya Das;Chhaya Das

  • Foxp1 regulates cardiac outflow tract, endocardial cushion morphogenesis and myocyte proliferation and maturation

    Bin Wang;Joel Weidenfeld;Min Min Lu;Shanna Maika

  • Recurrent involvement of the REL and BCL11A loci in classical Hodgkin lymphoma.

    José I Martín-Subero;Stefan Gesk;Lana Harder;Takashi Sonoki

  • Interaction of cell-type-specific nuclear proteins with immunoglobulin VH promoter region sequences

    Nicholas F. Landolfi;J. Donald Capra;Philip W. Tucker

  • Multiple Domains Define the Expression and Regulatory Properties of Foxp1 Forkhead Transcriptional Repressors

    Bin Wang;Danjuan Lin;Chuan Li;Philip Tucker

  • The smaller human VH gene families display remarkably little polymorphism.

    Inaki Sanz;P. Kelly;C. Williams;S. Scholl

  • Regulation of T-cell receptor γ-chain RNA expression in murine Thy-1+ dendritic epidermal cells

    William A. Kuziel;Akira Takashima;Mark Bonyhadi;Paul R. Bergstresser

  • Splicing and transcription-associated proteins PSF and p54nrb/nonO bind to the RNA polymerase II CTD.

    Andrew Emili;Michael Shales;Susan McCracken;Weijun Xie

  • A new human immunoglobulin VH family preferentially rearranged in immature B-cell tumours.

    C. G. Humphries;A. Shen;W. A. Kuziel;J. D. Capra

  • PSF Is a Novel Corepressor That Mediates Its Effect through Sin3A and the DNA Binding Domain of Nuclear Hormone Receptors

    Mukul Mathur;Philip W. Tucker;Herbert H. Samuels

  • Regulation of RNA-polymerase-II-dependent transcription by N-WASP and its nuclear-binding partners.

    Xiaoyang Wu;Youngdong Yoo;Nataly N Okuhama;Philip W Tucker

Frequent Co-Authors

Frederick R. Blattner
Frederick R. Blattner University of Wisconsin–Madison
J D Capra
J D Capra The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Ellen S. Vitetta
Ellen S. Vitetta The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Julia E. Richards
Julia E. Richards University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Robert E. Tigelaar
Robert E. Tigelaar Yale University
Richard H. Scheuermann
Richard H. Scheuermann J. Craig Venter Institute
James P. Allison
James P. Allison The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Martin J. S. Dyer
Martin J. S. Dyer University of Leicester
Edward E. Morrisey
Edward E. Morrisey University of Pennsylvania
Jerry L. Slightom
Jerry L. Slightom AureoGen Biosciences (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Molecular Biology opens doors to a diverse range of online degrees and fast-growing healthcare careers. Many students use a bachelor's in molecular biology as a stepping stone to specialized professions. For example, those interested in communication disorders can explore a transition to SLP master’s for non-CSD majors through online bridge programs, broadening access for molecular biologists to become speech-language pathologists.

If you're looking to enter nursing, there are accelerated nursing programs for non nurses online that allow you to fast-track your career with a science background. Advanced practice roles are in high demand—psychiatric nurse practitioners, for example, command competitive compensation, as detailed in this guide on psychiatric np salary.

Ambitious students can also take advantage of fast track nurse practitioner programs, accelerating their path from molecular biology graduate to advanced clinical practice.

Best Scientists Citing Philip W. Tucker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles