World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
30287
World Ranking
13105
National Ranking
6689

Philip Felig publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip Felig sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 237 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Philip Felig D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip Felig sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Philip Felig was affiliated with Yale University in the United States during their academic career.

They were recognized as a member of the Association of American Physicians, an honor that marks affiliation with a professional organization dedicated to advancing medical science and practice.

Their work does not have detailed records of specific recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues, nor listed fields or subfields of study. There are no specified main topics or detailed data on book publications associated with their profile.

Due to the absence of specific published works and research topics in the available data, a precise account of the scope and focus areas of their scientific contributions cannot be provided.

Best Publications

  • Liver and kidney metabolism during prolonged starvation

    Oliver E. Owen;Philip Felig;Alfred P. Morgan;John Wahren

  • Substrate Turnover during Prolonged Exercise in Man: SPLANCHNIC AND LEG METABOLISM OF GLUCOSE, FREE FATTY ACIDS, AND AMINO ACIDS

    Gunvor Ahlborg;Philip Felig;Lars Hagenfeldt;Rosa Hendler

  • Amino acid metabolism in man.

    P Felig

  • Plasma Amino Acid Levels and Insulin Secretion in Obesity

    Philip Felig;Errol Marliss;George F. Cahill

  • The glucose-alanine cycle.

    Philip Felig

  • Amino acid metabolism during prolonged starvation

    Philip Felig;Oliver E. Owen;John Wahren;George F. Cahill

  • Glucose metabolism during leg exercise in man

    John Wahren;John Wahren;Philip Felig;Philip Felig;Gunvor Ahlborg;Gunvor Ahlborg;Lennart Jorfeldt;Lennart Jorfeldt

  • Regulation of Splanchnic and Peripheral Glucose Uptake by Insulin and Hyperglycemia in Man

    Ralph A DeFronzo;Eleuterio Ferrannini;Rosa Hendler;Philip Felig

  • Amino acid metabolism in exercising man

    Philip Felig;John Wahren

  • Amino acid balance across tissues of the forearm in postabsorptive man. Effects of insulin at two dose levels

    Thomas Pozefsky;Philip Felig;Jordan D. Tobin;J. Stuart Soeldner

  • Synergistic interaction between exercise and insulin on peripheral glucose uptake.

    R A DeFronzo;E Ferrannini;Y Sato;P Felig

  • Reduction to Normal of Plasma Glucose in Juvenile Diabetes by Subcutaneous Administration of Insulin with a Portable Infusion Pump

    William V. Tamborlane;Robert S. Sherwin;Myron Genel;Philip Felig

  • Fuel homeostasis in exercise.

    Philip Felig;John Wahren

  • Effect of protein ingestion on splanchnic and leg metabolism in normal man and in patients with diabetes mellitus.

    J Wahren;P Felig;L Hagenfeldt

  • Effect of ketone infusions on amino acid and nitrogen metabolism in man.

    R S Sherwin;R G Hendler;P Felig

  • Splanchnic and peripheral glucose and amino acid metabolism in diabetes mellitus

    John Wahren;Philip Felig;Erol Cerasi;Rolf Luft

  • Influence of hyperinsulinemia, hyperglycemia, and the route of glucose administration on splanchnic glucose exchange

    Ralph A. DeFronzo;Eleuterio Ferrannini;Rosa Hendler;John Wahren

  • Influence of Endogenous Insulin Secretion on Splanchnic Glucose and Amino Acid Metabolism in Man

    Philip Felig;John Wahren

  • Hyperglucagonemia in Laennec's cirrhosis. The role of portal-systemic shunting.

    Robert Sherwin;Prakash Joshi;Rosa Hendler;Philip Felig

  • Hyperglucagonemia and blood glucose regulation in normal, obese and diabetic subjects.

    Robert S. Sherwin;Merrick Fisher;Rosa Hendler;Philip Felig

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert S. Sherwin
Robert S. Sherwin Yale University
John Wahren
John Wahren Karolinska Institute
Ralph A. DeFronzo
Ralph A. DeFronzo The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
William V. Tamborlane
William V. Tamborlane Yale University
Roger H Unger
Roger H Unger The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
John A. Cunningham
John A. Cunningham Centre for Addiction and Mental Health
Daniel Porte
Daniel Porte University of California, San Diego
Suad Efendic
Suad Efendic Karolinska Institute
Gerald M. Reaven
Gerald M. Reaven Stanford University
Mulchand S. Patel
Mulchand S. Patel University at Buffalo, State University of New York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in medical careers but seeking alternative routes to a traditional MD, several flexible online degree options are available. One popular pathway is the direct entry msn online program, designed for non-nurses with a bachelor’s degree in another field who want to enter advanced nursing roles quickly.

Some students may be looking for direct admit nursing programs that provide a smoother application process and quicker start in the nursing profession. There are also options like medical billing and coding schools that accept financial aid, which are ideal for those who want to work in healthcare administration without direct patient care.

Additionally, certain programs do not require entrance exams such as TEAS or HESI. If you're wondering, do you have to take a teas test for lpn, you’ll find schools that allow you to skip these exams, making the pathway more accessible. Whether your interest is clinical or administrative, online options can help you advance your healthcare career from anywhere.

Best Scientists Citing Philip Felig

Recently Published Articles