What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Social psychology
- World War II
- Social science
His scientific interests lie mostly in Social psychology, Developmental psychology, Valence, Attribution and Self-concept.
His Social psychology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Action and Value.
The various areas that Norman T. Feather examines in his Developmental psychology study include Persistence, Personality and Anxiety.
His work is dedicated to discovering how Valence, Affect are connected with Personal control, Variables and Personal competence and other disciplines.
His Self-concept research incorporates elements of Academic specialization, Development economics and Age differences.
His Cognitive psychology course of study focuses on Social perception and Pleasure and Schadenfreude.
His most cited work include:
- A theory of achievement motivation (843 citations)
- Expectations and actions : expectancy-value models in psychology (582 citations)
- Values, valences, and choice: The influences of values on the perceived attractiveness and choice of alternatives. (522 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Social psychology, Developmental psychology, Attribution, Value and Rokeach Value Survey.
His work on Sympathy and Valence as part of general Social psychology research is frequently linked to Resentment, Relation and Retributive justice, bridging the gap between disciplines.
His Developmental psychology research incorporates themes from Clinical psychology, Personality and Anxiety.
Attribution is closely attributed to Affect in his study.
Norman T. Feather integrates Value with Power in his study.
His Rokeach Value Survey study frequently draws connections to adjacent fields such as Value.
He most often published in these fields:
- Social psychology (70.00%)
- Developmental psychology (27.50%)
- Attribution (13.50%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2003-2016)?
- Social psychology (70.00%)
- Resentment (6.50%)
- Retributive justice (6.00%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Norman T. Feather mostly deals with Social psychology, Resentment, Retributive justice, Schadenfreude and Restorative justice.
His work in the fields of Sympathy overlaps with other areas such as Power.
His study in Sympathy is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Anger, Regret, Jealousy and Appraisal theory.
His research in Restorative justice intersects with topics in Forgiveness and Theory of criminal justice.
His Value research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Expectancy-value theory and Well-being.
His research integrates issues of Stigma, Attribution and Clinical psychology in his study of Affect.
Between 2003 and 2016, his most popular works were:
- Organizational citizenship behaviours in relation to job status, job insecurity, organizational commitment and identification, job satisfaction and work values (418 citations)
- Retributive and restorative justice (241 citations)
- Understanding unemployed people's job search behaviour, unemployment experience and well-being: a comparison of expectancy-value theory and self-determination theory. (133 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Social psychology
- World War II
- Social science
Norman T. Feather mainly focuses on Social psychology, Value, Criminology, Retributive justice and Power.
His research on Social psychology frequently links to adjacent areas such as Justice.
His Justice research includes themes of Identity, Outgroup, Theory of criminal justice, Restorative justice and Punishment.
Norman T. Feather has researched Value in several fields, including Expectancy-value theory and Well-being.
He focuses mostly in the field of Sympathy, narrowing it down to matters related to Schadenfreude and, in some cases, Appraisal theory.
The concepts of his Affect study are interwoven with issues in Stigma and Clinical psychology.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
