World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 33 2522 2381 406 369 152 3679

Mark Tadajewski publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark Tadajewski between 2002 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark Tadajewski published across 24 years, from 2002 to 2025, averaging 6.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2014. 3 of the 162 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2014. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 0 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 6 publications 2007: 0 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 16 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 18 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 5 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 4 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 2 publications
2002 2025

162 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark Tadajewski: publications per year, 2002 to 2025
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 0
2004 2
2005 1
2006 6
2007 0
2008 13
2009 16
2010 11
2011 17
2012 11
2013 10
2014 18
2015 7
2016 10
2017 14
2018 5
2019 1
2020 4
2021 2
2022 5
2023 5
2024 1
2025 2
Total 162
Download as CSV

Mark Tadajewski publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Tadajewski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 150–154 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 152 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85 152
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark Tadajewski D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Tadajewski sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161 33
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Mark Tadajewski is affiliated with Royal Holloway University of London in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Business, Management and Accounting as well as Social Sciences, with a focused engagement in Marketing, Sociology and Political Science, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Education, and Clinical Psychology.

Their recent scholarly work includes publications in distinguished journals such as the Journal of Marketing Management, Marketing Theory, and others. Some of their notable papers are:

  • "From goods-dominant logic to service-dominant logic? Service, service capitalism and service socialism" (2020, Marketing Theory)
  • "On being critically oriented in precarious times: for resistant curiosity" (2022, Journal of Marketing Management)
  • "Writing telepathy back into marketing theory" (2022, Marketing Theory)

Mark Tadajewski's frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Marketing Management
  • Journal of Historical Research in Marketing
  • Marketing Theory
  • Journal of Customer Behaviour
  • Consumption Markets & Culture

They have collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • D.G. Brian Jones
  • Andrea Prothero
  • Anoop Bhogal-Nair
  • Andrew Lindridge
  • Mona Moufahim

The primary topics addressed in their research include:

  • Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification
  • Management and Organizational Studies
  • Fashion and Cultural Textiles
  • Sharing Economy and Platforms
  • Management and Marketing Education
  • Psychology of Social Influence
  • Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology

Among the recent notable publications associated with Mark Tadajewski are:

  • "#MeToo and beyond: inequality and injustice in marketing practice and academia" (2021, Journal of Marketing Management)
  • "Disability and well-being: towards a Capability Approach for marketplace access" (2023, Journal of Marketing Management)

The body of work by Mark Tadajewski reflects engagement with critical perspectives on marketing theory and practice, touching on themes of social justice, service economy critiques, and the psychological and social dimensions of consumer behavior and organizational studies.

Best Publications

  • Remembering motivation research: toward an alternative genealogy of interpretive consumer research

    Mark Tadajewski

  • Towards a history of critical marketing studies

    Mark Tadajewski

  • The ordering of marketing theory: the influence of McCarthyism and the Cold War:

    Mark Tadajewski

  • The SAGE handbook of marketing theory

    Pauline Maclaran;Michael Saren;Barbara B. Stern;Mark Tadajewski

  • Critical marketing : contemporary issues in marketing

    Mark Tadajewski;Douglas T. Brownlie

  • Critical marketing studies: logical empiricism, ‘critical performativity’ and marketing practice:

    Mark Tadajewski

  • History of marketing thought

    Mark Tadajewski

  • The discourses of marketing and development: towards ‘critical transformative marketing research’

    Mark Tadajewski;Jessica Chelekis;Benet DeBerry-Spence;Bernardo Figueiredo

  • Compensatory consumption and consumer compromises: a state-of-the-art review

    Bernadett Koles;Victoria Wells;Mark Tadajewski

  • Historical research in marketing theory and practice: a review essay

    Mark Tadajewski;D.G. Brian Jones

  • Incommensurable paradigms, cognitive bias and the politics of marketing theory

    Mark Tadajewski

  • Academic labour, journal ranking lists and the politics of knowledge production in marketing

    Mark Tadajewski

  • Rethinking the Emergence of Relationship Marketing

    Mark Tadajewski;Michael Saren

  • The foundations of relationship marketing: reciprocity and trade relations

    Mark Tadajewski

  • The Philosophy of Marketing Theory: Historical and Future Directions

    Mark Tadajewski

  • Anthropology and consumer research: qualitative insights into green consumer behavior

    Mark Tadajewski;Sigmund Wagner‐Tsukamoto

  • Key Concepts in Critical Management Studies

    Mark Tadajewski;Pauline Maclaran;Elizabeth Parsons;Martin Parker

  • The past is a foreign country : amnesia and marketing theory

    Mark Tadajewski;Michael Saren

  • Scientific marketing management and the emergence of the ethical marketing concept

    Mark Tadajewski;D.G. Brian Jones

  • The Routledge Companion to Critical Marketing

    Mark Tadajewski;Matthew Higgins;Janice Denegri-Knott;Rohit Varman

  • Character analysis and racism in marketing theory and practice

    Mark Tadajewski

Frequent Co-Authors

Nick C. Ellis
Nick C. Ellis University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Michael Saren
Michael Saren University of Birmingham
Martin Parker
Martin Parker University of Bristol
Clifford J. Shultz
Clifford J. Shultz Loyola University Chicago
Andrea Prothero
Andrea Prothero University College Dublin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The landscape of Business and Management education in the USA is rapidly evolving, with flexible online degrees opening up new career pathways. Today, students can find specialized programs that cater to both traditional and emerging business roles.

For those interested in finance, an online accountant degree provides a cost-effective route to becoming a certified accountant or financial analyst. Meanwhile, technology-driven students might prefer an online ai degree, which prepares graduates for roles in data analytics, automation, and strategic decision-making.

The demand for project leaders in the built environment is also growing. Pursuing online construction management degrees can lead to fulfilling supervisory positions in construction and real estate sectors. For professionals ready to advance into senior roles, online emba programs are designed to enhance leadership and strategic management skills, often while you continue to work.

These online pathways offer flexibility, diverse specialization, and the professional credentials needed to succeed in today’s competitive business world.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Tadajewski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles