World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
56
Citations
10600
World Ranking
3672
National Ranking
1402

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
56
Citations
10617
World Ranking
14481
National Ranking
6089

Lisa Campbell publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa Campbell sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 130 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Lisa Campbell D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa Campbell sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lisa Campbell is affiliated with Texas A&M University in the United States. Their research spans environmental science and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a particular focus on ecology, molecular biology, oceanography, environmental chemistry, and genetics as subfields of study.

The scientist's main research topics include protist diversity and phylogeny, microbial community ecology and physiology, marine and coastal ecosystems, marine toxins and detection methods, plant pathogens and fungal diseases, glioma diagnosis and treatment, and advanced radiotherapy techniques.

Frequent publication venues for their work are diverse, with significant contributions in:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Harmful Algae
  • Neuro-Oncology
  • Journal of Plankton Research
  • Journal of Phycology

Collaboration is an aspect of their research profile, with notable frequent coauthors including:

  • Chetan C. Gaonkar (16 publications)
  • David Brachman (6 publications)
  • Juliette L. Smith (5 publications)
  • Darren W. Henrichs (4 publications)
  • Adam Nowlan (4 publications)

Their body of work reflects a range of publication topics and years, including:

  • Global oceanic diazotroph database version 2 and elevated estimate of global oceanic N 2 fixation, 2023, Earth system science data
  • Growth response of Dinophysis, Mesodinium, and Teleaulax cultures to temperature, irradiance, and salinity, 2020, Harmful Algae
  • Application of a convolutional neural network to improve automated early warning of harmful algal blooms, 2021, Environmental Science and Pollution Research
  • Characterization of Dinophysis spp. (Dinophyceae, Dinophysiales) from the mid-Atlantic region of the United States1, 2020, Journal of Phycology
  • Tropical cyclones: what are their impacts on phytoplankton ecology?, 2022, Journal of Plankton Research

Best Publications

  • The Marine Microbial Eukaryote Transcriptome Sequencing Project (MMETSP): Illuminating the Functional Diversity of Eukaryotic Life in the Oceans through Transcriptome Sequencing

    Patrick J. Keeling;Patrick J. Keeling;Fabien Burki;Heather M. Wilcox;Bassem Allam

  • The importance of Prochlorococcus to community structure in the central North Pacific Ocean

    L. Campbell;H. A. Nolla;D. Vaulot

  • Photosynthetic picoplankton community structure in the subtropical North Pacific Ocean near Hawaii (station ALOHA)

    Lisa Campbell;Daniel Vaulot

  • Prochlorococcus growth rate and contribution to primary production in the equatorial and subtropical North Pacific Ocean

    Hongbin Liu;Hector A. Nolla;Lisa D. Campbell

  • Annual variability of phytoplankton and bacteria in the subtropical North Pacific Ocean at Station ALOHA during the 1991–1994 ENSO event

    Lisa D. Campbell;Hongbin Liu;Hector A. Nolla;Daniel Vaulot

  • Basin-wide distributions of living carbon components and the inverted trophic pyramid of the central gyre of the North Atlantic Ocean, summer 1993

    Buck Kr;Chavez Fp;Campbell L

  • Microbial food web structure in the Arabian Sea: a US JGOFS study

    David L. Garrison;Marcia M. Gowing;Margaret P. Hughes;Lisa D. Campbell

  • Picophytoplankton biomass distribution in the global ocean

    E. T. Buitenhuis;W. K. W. Li;Daniel Vaulot;M. W. Lomas

  • KARENIA: The biology and ecology of a toxic genus

    Larry E. Brand;Lisa Campbell;Eileen Bresnan

  • Genetic characterisation of Emiliania huxleyi (Haptophyta)

    Linda Medlin;G. L. A. Barker;L. Campbell;J. C. Green

  • Spatial patterns in phytoplankton growth and microzooplankton grazing in the Arabian Sea during monsoon forcing

    Michael R. Landry;Susan L. Brown;Lisa D. Campbell;John Constantinou

  • First harmful Dinophysis (Dinophyceae, Dinophysiales) bloom in the U.S. is revealed by automated imaging flow cytometry.

    Lisa Campbell;Robert J. Olson;Heidi M. Sosik;Ann Abraham

  • Response of microbial community structure to environmental forcing in the Arabian Sea

    Lisa D. Campbell;Michael R. Landry;John Constantinou;Hector A. Nolla

  • Marine ecology: Microbial microdiversity

    Jed A. Fuhrman;Lisa Campbell

  • Oligonucleotide Probes for the Identification of Three Algal Groups by Dot Blot and Fluorescent Whole‐Cell Hybridization

    Nathalie Simon;Lisa Campbell;Erla Örnolfsdottir;René Groben

  • A nitrate-dependent Synechococcus bloom in surface Sargasso Sea water

    Hilary E. Glover;Barbara B. Prézelin;Lisa Campbell;Michael Wyman

  • Physiology and evolution of nitrate acquisition in Prochlorococcus.

    Paul M Berube;Steven J Biller;Alyssa G Kent;Jessie W Berta-Thompson

  • Bacterial community composition during two consecutive NE Monsoon periods in the Arabian Sea studied by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) of rRNA genes

    Lasse Riemann;Grieg F. Steward;Laura B. Fandino;Lisa Campbell

  • Seasonal variability in the phytoplankton community of the North Pacific Subtropical Gyre

    Christopher D. Winn;Lisa Campbell;James R. Christian;Ricardo M. Letelier

  • Carbon cycling in primary production bottle incubations: inferences from grazing experiments and photosynthetic studies using and in the Arabian Sea

    Edward A Laws;Michael R Landry;Richard T Barber;Lisa Campbell

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael R. Landry
Michael R. Landry University of California, San Diego
Daniel Vaulot
Daniel Vaulot Station Biologique De Roscoff
Hongbin Liu
Hongbin Liu Hong Kong University of Science and Technology
Heidi M. Sosik
Heidi M. Sosik Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
David M. Karl
David M. Karl University of Hawaii at Manoa
John H. Paul
John H. Paul University of South Florida St. Petersburg
Robert J. Olson
Robert J. Olson Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution
Robert R. Bidigare
Robert R. Bidigare University of Hawaii at Manoa
Farooq Azam
Farooq Azam University of California, San Diego
Francisco P. Chavez
Francisco P. Chavez Monterey Bay Aquarium Research Institute

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Environmental Sciences is an interdisciplinary field that opens doors to a variety of career pathways. For those interested in earth processes and natural resources, pursuing a geology online degree provides valuable expertise in studying the Earth's physical structure. This knowledge is crucial for addressing environmental challenges such as resource management and natural hazard mitigation.

Another promising area is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), which equips students with tools to analyze spatial data for environmental planning and conservation. Exploring the top GIS masters programs can help students gain advanced skills for careers in environmental monitoring and urban development.

Leadership and policy-making are equally important in this field. For professionals aiming to influence environmental regulations and public administration, the easiest online MPA programs offer flexible pathways to earn a Master of Public Administration and develop leadership skills.

Understanding human behavior and social dynamics also plays a critical role in environmental solutions. Pursuing an accredited online bachelors in sociology can prepare students to address environmental issues from a societal perspective, including community engagement and sustainable development.

Best Scientists Citing Lisa Campbell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles