World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 32 10717 10034 5601 5114 94 10047

Linda Baker publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Linda Baker between 1955 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Linda Baker published across 71 years, from 1955 to 2025, averaging 2.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2020. 3 of the 149 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1955 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2020. 1955: 2 publications 1956: 0 publications 1957: 0 publications 1958: 11 publications 1959: 0 publications 1960: 0 publications 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 3 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 3 publications 1978: 4 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 2 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 4 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 5 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 4 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 0 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 5 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 1 publication 2024: 2 publications 2025: 1 publication
1955 2025

149 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Linda Baker: publications per year, 1955 to 2025
Year Publications
1955 2
1956 0
1957 0
1958 11
1959 0
1960 0
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 3
1976 0
1977 3
1978 4
1979 3
1980 1
1981 1
1982 2
1983 0
1984 3
1985 3
1986 0
1987 4
1988 1
1989 4
1990 1
1991 0
1992 1
1993 1
1994 5
1995 0
1996 4
1997 6
1998 4
1999 2
2000 3
2001 1
2002 4
2003 3
2004 3
2005 5
2006 6
2007 7
2008 0
2009 5
2010 3
2011 4
2012 1
2013 5
2014 4
2015 0
2016 3
2017 2
2018 2
2019 0
2020 12
2021 2
2022 1
2023 1
2024 2
2025 1
Total 149
Download as CSV

Linda Baker publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Baker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 94 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 94
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Linda Baker D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Baker sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702 32
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Linda Baker is affiliated with the University of Maryland, Baltimore County in the United States. Their scholarly work spans multiple fields, including education, developmental and educational psychology, health, clinical psychology, and finance. Their research primarily focuses on topics related to education systems and policy, parental involvement in education, school choice and performance, diverse education studies and reforms, intimate partner and family violence, child abuse and trauma, and community development and social impact.

Their research contributions are published in a range of academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Journal of materials research/Pratt's guide to venture capital sources
  • Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium)
  • Early Education and Development
  • Journal of Family Violence
  • Translational Issues in Psychological Science

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Strands of Emergent Literacy and Their Antecedents in the Home: Urban Preschoolers' Early Literacy Development," 2020, Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium)
  • "Poverty, Parent Involvement, and Children's Reading Skills: Testing the Compensatory Effect of the Amount of Classroom Reading Instruction," 2020, Early Education and Development
  • "Contexts of Emergent Literacy: Everyday Home Experiences of Urban Pre-Kindergarten Children," 2020, Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium)
  • "Parental Ideas about Development and Socialization of Children on the Threshold of Schooling," 2020, Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium)
  • "Voices of Experience: Development of the Flourishing Practice Model of Capabilities of Intimate Partner Violence Specialists," 2023, Journal of Family Violence

Linda Baker frequently collaborates with other researchers. Their most common co-authors include:

  • Griselda Bonilla
  • L. J. Brillson
  • Kristen Brosnan
  • Coray M. Colina
  • Catherine Dubourdieu

Their work covers several important subfields, notably education, developmental and educational psychology, and clinical psychology, indicating a multidisciplinary approach that intersects social and behavioral sciences with applied research in educational contexts.

Best Publications

  • Dimensions of Children's Motivation for Reading and Their Relations to Reading Activity and Reading Achievement.

    Linda Baker;Allan Wigfield

  • Metacognitive skills and reading

    L. Baker

  • Home and family influences on motivations for reading

    Linda Baker;Deborah Scher;Kirsten Mackler

  • Metacognition, comprehension monitoring, and the adult reader

    Linda Baker

  • Beginning Readers' Motivation for Reading in Relation to Parental Beliefs and Home Reading Experiences.

    Linda Baker;Deborah Scher

  • Comprehension Monitoring: Identifying and Coping with Text Confusions

    Linda Baker

  • The Role of Parents in Motivating Struggling Readers.

    Linda Baker

  • Parents' Interactions with Their First-Grade Children During Storybook Reading and Relations with Subsequent Home Reading Activity and Reading Achievement

    Linda Baker;Kirsten Mackler;Susan Sonnenschein;Robert Serpell

  • Effects of inconsistent information on text processing : evidence for comprehension monitoring

    Linda Baker;Richard Ivan Anderson

  • Engaging young readers : promoting achievement and motivation

    Linda Baker;Mariam Jean Dreher;John T. Guthrie

  • Differences in the Standards Used by College Students to Evaluate Their Comprehension of Expository Prose.

    Linda Baker

  • Children's Effective Use of Multiple Standards for Evaluating Their Comprehension.

    Linda Baker

  • Spontaneous versus instructed use of multiple standards for evaluating comprehension: Effects of age, reading proficiency, and type of standard☆

    Linda Baker

  • Students' Lecture Notes and Their Relation to Test Performance:

    Linda Baker;Bruce R. Lombardi

  • THEORY-DERIVED EXPLANATIONS OF MALE VIOLENCE AGAINST FEMALE PARTNERS: LITERATURE UPDATE AND RELATED IMPLICATIONS FOR TREATMENT AND EVALUATION

    Alison Cunningham;Peter G. Jaffe;Linda Baker;Sue Malla

  • Development of the Metacognitive Skills of Prediction and Evaluation in Children With or Without Math Disability

    Adia J. Garrett;Michèle M. M. Mazzocco;Linda Baker

  • Becoming Literate in the City: The Baltimore Early Childhood Project

    Robert Serpell;Linda Baker;Susan Sonnenschein

  • Parental Beliefs about Ways to Help Children Learn to Read: The Impact of an Entertainment or a Skills Perspective

    Susan Sonnenschein;Linda Baker;Robert Serpell;Deborah Scher

  • Intimate culture of families in the early socialization of literacy.

    Robert Serpell;Susan Sonnenschein;Linda Baker;Hemalatha Ganapathy

  • Developing Engaged Readers in School and Home Communities

    Linda Baker;Peter Afflerbach;David Reinking

  • The development of prose comprehension skills

    Linda Baker;Nancy L. Stein

  • Managing as carers of stroke survivors: Strategies from the field

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

John T. Guthrie
John T. Guthrie University of Maryland, College Park
Maureen M. Black
Maureen M. Black University of Maryland, Baltimore
Michèle M.M. Mazzocco
Michèle M.M. Mazzocco University of Minnesota
Douglas M. Teti
Douglas M. Teti Pennsylvania State University
Allan Wigfield
Allan Wigfield University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens up a wide range of online degree options and diverse career routes. Whether you are drawn to clinical practice, research, counseling, or organizational roles, online degrees offer flexibility for students with different needs and lifestyles.

When considering programs, it’s valuable to review regional rankings to find highly regarded universities. For example, you can compare the best psychology degree programs ranking in Colorado Springs if you are looking at schools in Colorado. Likewise, students interested in the southern United States might explore the best psychology degree programs ranking in Conway or the top psychology programs in Florida. For those on the East Coast, the best psychology degree programs ranking in Fairfax provides helpful insights.

Graduates of online psychology programs may pursue careers as counselors, human resource specialists, behavioral analysts, or research assistants. The flexibility of online study also supports working adults aiming to pivot into rewarding psychology-based roles across various industries.

Best Scientists Citing Linda Baker

Trending Scientists