World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
10047
World Ranking
10717
National Ranking
5601

Linda Baker publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Baker sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 94 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Linda Baker D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda Baker sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Linda Baker is affiliated with the University of Maryland, Baltimore County in the United States. Their scholarly work spans multiple fields, including education, developmental and educational psychology, health, clinical psychology, and finance. Their research primarily focuses on topics related to education systems and policy, parental involvement in education, school choice and performance, diverse education studies and reforms, intimate partner and family violence, child abuse and trauma, and community development and social impact.

Their research contributions are published in a range of academic venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Journal of materials research/Pratt's guide to venture capital sources
  • Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium)
  • Early Education and Development
  • Journal of Family Violence
  • Translational Issues in Psychological Science

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Strands of Emergent Literacy and Their Antecedents in the Home: Urban Preschoolers' Early Literacy Development," 2020, Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium)
  • "Poverty, Parent Involvement, and Children's Reading Skills: Testing the Compensatory Effect of the Amount of Classroom Reading Instruction," 2020, Early Education and Development
  • "Contexts of Emergent Literacy: Everyday Home Experiences of Urban Pre-Kindergarten Children," 2020, Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium)
  • "Parental Ideas about Development and Socialization of Children on the Threshold of Schooling," 2020, Maryland Shared Open Access Repository (USMAI Consortium)
  • "Voices of Experience: Development of the Flourishing Practice Model of Capabilities of Intimate Partner Violence Specialists," 2023, Journal of Family Violence

Linda Baker frequently collaborates with other researchers. Their most common co-authors include:

  • Griselda Bonilla
  • L. J. Brillson
  • Kristen Brosnan
  • Coray M. Colina
  • Catherine Dubourdieu

Their work covers several important subfields, notably education, developmental and educational psychology, and clinical psychology, indicating a multidisciplinary approach that intersects social and behavioral sciences with applied research in educational contexts.

Best Publications

  • Dimensions of Children's Motivation for Reading and Their Relations to Reading Activity and Reading Achievement.

    Linda Baker;Allan Wigfield

  • Metacognitive skills and reading

    L. Baker

  • Home and family influences on motivations for reading

    Linda Baker;Deborah Scher;Kirsten Mackler

  • Metacognition, comprehension monitoring, and the adult reader

    Linda Baker

  • Beginning Readers' Motivation for Reading in Relation to Parental Beliefs and Home Reading Experiences.

    Linda Baker;Deborah Scher

  • Comprehension Monitoring: Identifying and Coping with Text Confusions

    Linda Baker

  • The Role of Parents in Motivating Struggling Readers.

    Linda Baker

  • Parents' Interactions with Their First-Grade Children During Storybook Reading and Relations with Subsequent Home Reading Activity and Reading Achievement

    Linda Baker;Kirsten Mackler;Susan Sonnenschein;Robert Serpell

  • Effects of inconsistent information on text processing : evidence for comprehension monitoring

    Linda Baker;Richard Ivan Anderson

  • Engaging young readers : promoting achievement and motivation

    Linda Baker;Mariam Jean Dreher;John T. Guthrie

  • Differences in the Standards Used by College Students to Evaluate Their Comprehension of Expository Prose.

    Linda Baker

  • Children's Effective Use of Multiple Standards for Evaluating Their Comprehension.

    Linda Baker

  • Spontaneous versus instructed use of multiple standards for evaluating comprehension: Effects of age, reading proficiency, and type of standard☆

    Linda Baker

  • Students' Lecture Notes and Their Relation to Test Performance:

    Linda Baker;Bruce R. Lombardi

  • THEORY-DERIVED EXPLANATIONS OF MALE VIOLENCE AGAINST FEMALE PARTNERS: LITERATURE UPDATE AND RELATED IMPLICATIONS FOR TREATMENT AND EVALUATION

    Alison Cunningham;Peter G. Jaffe;Linda Baker;Sue Malla

  • Development of the Metacognitive Skills of Prediction and Evaluation in Children With or Without Math Disability

    Adia J. Garrett;Michèle M. M. Mazzocco;Linda Baker

  • Becoming Literate in the City: The Baltimore Early Childhood Project

    Robert Serpell;Linda Baker;Susan Sonnenschein

  • Parental Beliefs about Ways to Help Children Learn to Read: The Impact of an Entertainment or a Skills Perspective

    Susan Sonnenschein;Linda Baker;Robert Serpell;Deborah Scher

  • Intimate culture of families in the early socialization of literacy.

    Robert Serpell;Susan Sonnenschein;Linda Baker;Hemalatha Ganapathy

  • Developing Engaged Readers in School and Home Communities

    Linda Baker;Peter Afflerbach;David Reinking

  • The development of prose comprehension skills

    Linda Baker;Nancy L. Stein

  • Managing as carers of stroke survivors: Strategies from the field

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

John T. Guthrie
John T. Guthrie University of Maryland, College Park
Maureen M. Black
Maureen M. Black University of Maryland, Baltimore
Michèle M.M. Mazzocco
Michèle M.M. Mazzocco University of Minnesota
Douglas M. Teti
Douglas M. Teti Pennsylvania State University
Allan Wigfield
Allan Wigfield University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens up a wide range of online degree options and diverse career routes. Whether you are drawn to clinical practice, research, counseling, or organizational roles, online degrees offer flexibility for students with different needs and lifestyles.

When considering programs, it’s valuable to review regional rankings to find highly regarded universities. For example, you can compare the best psychology degree programs ranking in Colorado Springs if you are looking at schools in Colorado. Likewise, students interested in the southern United States might explore the best psychology degree programs ranking in Conway or the top psychology programs in Florida. For those on the East Coast, the best psychology degree programs ranking in Fairfax provides helpful insights.

Graduates of online psychology programs may pursue careers as counselors, human resource specialists, behavioral analysts, or research assistants. The flexibility of online study also supports working adults aiming to pivot into rewarding psychology-based roles across various industries.

Best Scientists Citing Linda Baker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles