World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Jennifer C. McIntosh

Jennifer C. McIntosh

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
48
Citations
7012
World Ranking
3888
National Ranking
1525

Jennifer C. McIntosh publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennifer C. McIntosh sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 223 publications — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Jennifer C. McIntosh D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jennifer C. McIntosh sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jennifer C. McIntosh is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States. Their research primarily spans Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with many contributions across these fields.

The scientist's research focuses on a range of topics including groundwater and isotope geochemistry, hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis, groundwater flow and contamination studies, methane hydrates and related phenomena, geology and paleoclimatology research, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, and hydrology and watershed management studies.

They have contributed to several recent papers, notable for publication and citation counts. These include:

  • Where Is the Bottom of a Watershed?, 2020, Water Resources Research
  • Crustal Groundwater Volumes Greater Than Previously Thought, 2021, Geophysical Research Letters
  • Signatures of Hydrologic Function Across the Critical Zone Observatory Network, 2020, Water Resources Research
  • Deep Meteoric Water Circulation in Earth's Crust, 2021, Geophysical Research Letters
  • Rethinking groundwater age, 2020, Nature Geoscience

Collaborations have been a significant element of their work, with frequent co-authors including Grant Ferguson, Ji-Hyun Kim, Peter W. Reiners, Lydia Bailey, and Chandler Noyes.

Jennifer C. McIntosh's publications are often found in journals and venues such as Water Resources Research, Abstracts with programs - Geological Society of America, Geophysical Research Letters, Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), and Geological Society of America Bulletin.

Within their scientific disciplines, the subfields where their research is concentrated include geochemistry and petrology, environmental engineering, mechanics of materials, environmental chemistry, and atmospheric science.

Best Publications

  • Organic substances in produced and formation water from unconventional natural gas extraction in coal and shale

    William H. Orem;Calin A. Tatu;Matthew S. Varonka;Harry E. Lerch

  • Microbial production and modification of gases in sedimentary basins: A geochemical case study from a Devonian shale gas play, Michigan basin

    Anna M. Martini;Lynn M. Walter;Tim C. W. Ku;Joyce M. Budai

  • Enhanced microbial coalbed methane generation: A review of research, commercial activity, and remaining challenges

    Daniel J. Ritter;David S. Vinson;Elliott P. Barnhart;Elliott P. Barnhart;Denise M. Akob

  • Expanding the role of reactive transport models in critical zone processes

    Li Li;Kate Maher;Alexis Navarre-Sitchler;Jennifer Druhan

  • Nonequilibrium clumped isotope signals in microbial methane

    David T. Wang;David T. Wang;Danielle S. Gruen;Danielle S. Gruen;Barbara Sherwood Lollar;Kai-Uwe Hinrichs

  • Chemical and isotopic tracers of the contribution of microbial gas in Devonian organic-rich shales and reservoir sandstones, northern Appalachian Basin.

    Stephen G. Osborn;Jennifer C. McIntosh

  • Pleistocene recharge to midcontinent basins: effects on salinity structure and microbial gas generation

    J.C. McIntosh;L.M. Walter;A.M. Martini

  • Interactions Between Biogeochemistry and Hydrologic Systems

    Kathleen A. Lohse;Paul D. Brooks;Jennifer C. McIntosh;Thomas Meixner

  • Pleistocene hydrology of North America: The role of ice sheets in reorganizing groundwater flow systems

    Mark Person;Jennifer McIntosh;Victor Bense;V. H. Remenda

  • Identification of microbial and thermogenic gas components from Upper Devonian black shale cores, Illinois and Michigan basins

    Anna M. Martini;Lynn M. Walter;Jennifer C. McIntosh

  • Mountain-block recharge: a review of current understanding.

    Katherine H. Markovich;Andrew H. Manning;Laura E. Condon;Jennifer C. McIntosh

  • Microbial methane from in situ biodegradation of coal and shale: A review and reevaluation of hydrogen and carbon isotope signatures

    David S. Vinson;Neal E. Blair;Anna M. Martini;Steve Larter

  • Paleowaters in Silurian-Devonian carbonate aquifers: Geochemical evolution of groundwater in the Great Lakes region since the Late Pleistocene

    J.C. McIntosh;L.M. Walter

  • How Water, Carbon, and Energy Drive Critical Zone Evolution: The Jemez–Santa Catalina Critical Zone Observatory

    Jon Chorover;Peter A. Troch;Craig Rasmussen;Paul D. Brooks

  • Influence of groundwater flowpaths, residence times and nutrients on the extent of microbial methanogenesis in coal beds: Powder River Basin, USA

    Brittney L. Bates;Jennifer C. McIntosh;Kathleen A. Lohse;Paul D. Brooks

  • Comparison of fluid geochemistry and microbiology of multiple organic-rich reservoirs in the Illinois Basin, USA: Evidence for controls on methanogenesis and microbial transport

    Melissa E. Schlegel;Jennifer C. McIntosh;Brittney L. Bates;Matthew F. Kirk

  • Where Is the Bottom of a Watershed

    Laura E. Condon;Katherine H. Markovich;Christa A. Kelleher;Jeffrey J. McDonnell;Jeffrey J. McDonnell

  • Relative weathering intensity of calcite versus dolomite in carbonate‐bearing temperate zone watersheds: Carbonate geochemistry and fluxes from catchments within the St. Lawrence and Danube river basins

    Kathryn Szramek;Kathryn Szramek;Jennifer C. McIntosh;Jennifer C. McIntosh;Erika L. Williams;Erika L. Williams;Tjasa Kanduc

  • Impacts of urbanization on groundwater quality and recharge in a semi-arid alluvial basin

    Mark A. Carlson;Kathleen A. Lohse;Jennifer C. McIntosh;Jean E.T. McLain

  • Assessment of basin-scale hydrologic impacts of CO2 sequestration, Illinois basin

    Mark Person;Amlan Banerjee;John Rupp;Cristian Medina

  • Volumetrically significant recharge of Pleistocene glacial meltwaters into epicratonic basins: Constraints imposed by solute mass balances

    J.C. McIntosh;L.M. Walter

Frequent Co-Authors

Jon Chorover
Jon Chorover University of Arizona
Thomas Meixner
Thomas Meixner University of Arizona
Paul D. Brooks
Paul D. Brooks University of Utah
Kathleen A. Lohse
Kathleen A. Lohse Idaho State University
Craig Rasmussen
Craig Rasmussen University of Arizona
Anna M. Martini
Anna M. Martini Amherst College
Peter Troch
Peter Troch University of Arizona
Jon D. Pelletier
Jon D. Pelletier University of Arizona
Mark Person
Mark Person New Mexico Institute of Mining and Technology
Adrian A. Harpold
Adrian A. Harpold University of Nevada Reno

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science in the USA opens doors to diverse career paths, many of which can be complemented by related online degrees. For those interested in enhancing communication and analytical skills within scientific fields, programs like the online mfa creative writing can be surprisingly beneficial. Developing strong writing abilities is crucial for publishing research or educating the public about environmental issues.

Alternatively, professionals looking to advance into leadership or management roles within environmental organizations might consider pursuing a masters degree in human resource management online. This degree offers skills in managing teams and organizational dynamics, essential for running successful projects and departments.

For older adults eager to shift into Earth Science or related fields, there are several best degrees for older adults that provide flexible online options. These programs accommodate varying schedules and learning paces, making education accessible at any stage of life.

Moreover, those interested in information science roles connected to Earth Science research should explore ala accredited schools. Accredited MLIS programs prepare graduates to manage scientific data libraries, ensuring valuable research is organized and accessible.

Best Scientists Citing Jennifer C. McIntosh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles