World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
11202
World Ranking
9077
National Ranking
555

Marek Sergot publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marek Sergot sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 123 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Marek Sergot D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marek Sergot sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marek Sergot is affiliated with Imperial College London in the United Kingdom. The primary focus of their research lies within the field of Computer Science, with extensive work in Artificial Intelligence. Their studies encompass several subfields, including Artificial Intelligence, Computational Theory and Mathematics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, and Management of Technology and Innovation.

Their research topics cover a range of areas:

  • Logic, Reasoning, and Knowledge
  • Computability, Logic, AI Algorithms
  • Neural Networks and Applications
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Evolutionary Algorithms and Applications
  • Philosophy and Theoretical Science
  • Semantic Web and Ontologies

Marek Sergot has contributed to various publication venues, demonstrating engagement with diverse audiences within their field. These venues include:

  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Artificial Intelligence and Law
  • Logic and Logical Philosophy
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Journal of Philosophical Logic

Some representative papers authored by Sergot or in collaboration with co-authors are as follows:

  • Making sense of raw input, 2021, Artificial Intelligence
  • Making sense of sensory input, 2021, Artificial Intelligence
  • Who is obliged when many are involved? Labelled transition system modelling of how obligation arises, 2020, Artificial Intelligence and Law
  • A Unified Logical Framework for Reasoning about Deontic Properties of Actions and States, 2023, Logic and Logical Philosophy
  • Evaluating the Apperception Engine, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequently collaborating researchers include:

  • K Taki
  • Pushmeet Kohli
  • Matko Bošnjak
  • Lars Buesing
  • Kevin Ellis

This profile reflects Marek Sergot's established involvement in logical frameworks, AI algorithms, and interdisciplinary applications bridging logic, philosophy, and artificial intelligence.

Best Publications

  • A logic-based calculus of events

    Robert Kowalski;Marek Sergot

  • The British Nationality Act as a logic program

    M. J. Sergot;F. Sadri;R. A. Kowalski;F. Kriwaczek

  • A Formal Characterisation of Institutionalised Power

    Andrew J. I. Jones;Marek J. Sergot

  • On the characterization of law and computer systems: the normative systems perspective

    Andrew J. I. Jones;Marek Sergot

  • Contrary-to-duty obligations

    Henry Prakken;Marek J. Sergot

  • Specifying norm-governed computational societies

    Alexander Artikis;Marek Sergot;Jeremy Pitt

  • Animated specifications of computational societies

    Alexander Artikis;Jeremy Pitt;Marek Sergot

  • Status-Based Access Control

    Steve Barker;Marek J. Sergot;Duminda Wijesekera

  • Dyadic Deontic Logic and Contrary-to-Duty Obligations

    Henry Prakken;Marek Sergot

  • Deontic interpreted systems

    Alessio Lomuscio;Marek J. Sergot

  • A computational theory of normative positions

    Marek Sergot

  • Logic programming for large scale applications in law: A formalisation of supplementary benefit legislation

    T. J. M. Bench-Capon;G. O. Robinson;T. W. Routen;M. J. Sergot

  • An Event Calculus for Event Recognition

    Alexander Artikis;Marek Sergot;Georgios Paliouras

  • Deontic logic in the representation of law: Towards a methodology

    Andrew J. Jones;Marek Sergot

  • Using the event calculus for tracking the normative state of contracts

    Andrew D. H. Farrell;Marek J. Sergot;Mathias Sallé;Claudio Bartolini

  • Voting in Multi-Agent Systems

    Jeremy Pitt;Lloyd Kamara;Marek Sergot;Alexander Artikis

  • A query-the-user facility for logic programming

    Marek Sergot

  • A logic programming approach to activity recognition

    Alexander Artikis;Marek Sergot;Georgios Paliouras

  • The representation of legal contracts

    Aspassia Daskalopulu;Marek Sergot

  • A protocol for resource sharing in norm-governed ad hoc networks

    Alexander Artikis;Lloyd Kamara;Jeremy Pitt;Marek Sergot

  • Towards model checking interpreted systems

    A. Lomuscio;F. Raimondi;M. J. Sergot

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander Artikis
Alexander Artikis University of Piraeus
Alessio Lomuscio
Alessio Lomuscio Imperial College London
Robert A. Kowalski
Robert A. Kowalski Imperial College London
Limsoon Wong
Limsoon Wong National University of Singapore
José Hernández-Orallo
José Hernández-Orallo Universitat Politècnica de València
Pushmeet Kohli
Pushmeet Kohli DeepMind (United Kingdom)
Georgios Paliouras
Georgios Paliouras National Centre of Scientific Research Demokritos
Antonis C. Kakas
Antonis C. Kakas University of Cyprus
Maxey C. M. Chung
Maxey C. M. Chung National University of Singapore
Elisa Bertino
Elisa Bertino Purdue University West Lafayette

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

When considering a career in computer science, it’s worth exploring related fields that offer strong job prospects and flexible online programs. For tech enthusiasts, an online master's degree cyber security can open doors to roles safeguarding digital assets, especially as cyber threats continue to rise.

If you are interested in leadership and organization, a bachelors construction management merges project management with technical knowledge, enabling graduates to oversee large-scale construction projects.

Alternatively, those drawn to public service might pursue the best online criminal justice degree, preparing for varied roles in law enforcement, corrections, or the legal system.

For a stable and analytical career, accounting is a popular option. Before enrolling, it’s important to consider the accounting degree cost to find affordable programs that deliver value.

Each pathway offers unique skills and opportunities. Online degrees provide flexibility, making it easier to balance study with work or personal commitments while pursuing a rewarding career.

Best Scientists Citing Marek Sergot

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles