World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
78
Citations
29420
World Ranking
17865
National Ranking
8912

Peter J. Kudenchuk publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Kudenchuk sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 300 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Peter J. Kudenchuk D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter J. Kudenchuk sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter J. Kudenchuk is affiliated with the University of Washington in the United States and has contributed extensively to research in the field of Medicine, with a strong focus on Emergency Medicine and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine. Their scholarly output includes significant work in subfields such as Biomedical Engineering, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, and Surgery.

The primary research topics covered by Kudenchuk include:

  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Cardiac Electrophysiology and Arrhythmias
  • Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
  • Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
  • Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring

Frequent co-authors working with Kudenchuk are:

  • Thomas D. Rea (67 joint publications)
  • Michael R. Sayre (35 joint publications)
  • Jason Coult (27 joint publications)
  • Heemun Kwok (26 joint publications)
  • Catherine R. Counts (24 joint publications)

Kudenchuk has published widely in several key venues, including:

  • Circulation (35 publications)
  • Resuscitation (28 publications)
  • Journal of the American Heart Association (8 publications)
  • JAMA Network Open (4 publications)
  • Circulation Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes (3 publications)

Some recent notable papers authored or co-authored by Kudenchuk include:

  • "Part 3: Adult Basic and Advanced Life Support: 2020 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care" (2020), published in Circulation
  • "Adult Basic Life Support: 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations" (2020), published in Circulation
  • "Association of Intra-arrest Transport vs Continued On-Scene Resuscitation With Survival to Hospital Discharge Among Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest" (2020), published in JAMA
  • "2022 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations: Summary From the Basic Life Support; Advanced Life Support; Pediatric Life Support; Neonatal Life Support; Education, Implementation, and Teams; and First Aid Task Forces" (2022), published in Circulation
  • "Adult Basic Life Support" (2020), published in Resuscitation

Best Publications

  • Part 8: Adult Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care

    Robert W. Neumar;Charles W. Otto;Mark S. Link;Steven L. Kronick

  • Part 7: Adult Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support 2015 American Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care

    Mark S. Link;Lauren C. Berkow;Peter J. Kudenchuk;Henry R. Halperin

  • Part 1: Executive Summary 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care

    John M. Field;Mary Fran Hazinski;Michael R. Sayre;Leon Chameides

  • Part 4: Advanced life support: 2015 International consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations

    Jerry P. Nolan;Mary Fran Hazinski;Richard Aickin;Farhan Bhanji

  • Chest Compression Fraction Determines Survival in Patients With Out-of-Hospital Ventricular Fibrillation

    Jim Christenson;Douglas Andrusiek;Siobhan Everson-Stewart;Peter Kudenchuk

  • Prehospital-Initiated vs Hospital-Initiated Thrombolytic Therapy: The Myocardial Infarction Triage and Intervention Trial

    W D Weaver;M Cerqueira;A P Hallstrom;P E Litwin

  • Effect of Prehospital Induction of Mild Hypothermia on Survival and Neurological Status Among Adults With Cardiac Arrest: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Francis Kim;Graham Nichol;Charles Maynard;Al Hallstrom

  • Part 8: Advanced Life Support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations

    Laurie J. Morrison;Charles D. Deakin;Peter T. Morley;Peter T. Morley;Clifton W. Callaway

  • Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial of Prehospital Induction of Mild Hypothermia in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest Patients With a Rapid Infusion of 4°C Normal Saline

    Francis Kim;Michele Olsufka;W. T. Longstreth;Charles Maynard

  • Comparison of presentation, treatment, and outcome of acute myocardial infarction in men versus women (the myocardial infarction triage and intervention registry

    P J Kudenchuk;C Maynard;J S Martin;M Wirkus

  • Part 6: Electrical therapies: Automated external defibrillators, defibrillation, cardioversion, and pacing: 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care

    Mark S. Link;Dianne L. Atkins;Rod S. Passman;Henry R. Halperin

  • Chest compression rates and survival following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

    Ahamed H. Idris;Danielle Guffey;Paul E. Pepe;Siobhan P. Brown

  • Implantable transvenous cardioverter-defibrillators.

    G H Bardy;B Hofer;G Johnson;P J Kudenchuk

  • Myocardial infarction triage and intervention project—Phase I: Patient characteristics and feasibility of prehospital initiation of thrombolytic therapy

    W.Douglas Weaver;Mickey S. Eisenberg;Jenny S. Martin;Paul E. Litwin

  • Ventricular Tachyarrhythmias after Cardiac Arrest in Public versus at Home

    Myron L. Weisfeldt;Siobhan Everson-Stewart;Colleen Sitlani;Thomas Rea

  • Out-of-Hospital Hypertonic Resuscitation Following Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Eileen M. Bulger;Karen J. Brasel;Martin Schreiber;Jeffrey D. Kerby

  • Association of early withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy for perceived neurological prognosis with mortality after cardiac arrest

    Jonathan Elmer;Cesar Torres;Tom P Aufderheide;Michael A Austin

  • Early versus later rhythm analysis in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

    Ian G. Stiell;Graham Nichol;Brian G. Leroux;Thomas D. Rea

  • Trial of Continuous or Interrupted Chest Compressions during CPR

    Graham Nichol;Brian Leroux;Henry Wang;Clifton W. Callaway

  • A Trial of an Impedance Threshold Device in Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

    Tom P. Aufderheide;Graham Nichol;Thomas D. Rea;Siobhan P. Brown

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in medicine, numerous online degree options can open doors beyond traditional medical school. Advanced online programs, such as a 1 year dnp program online, offer practicing nurses accelerated pathways to leadership roles in healthcare. Similarly, aspiring pharmacists can streamline their education with a 3 year online pharmd program, which allows for greater flexibility while earning a doctoral degree in pharmacy.

Not all healthcare careers require years of clinical study. A growing field related to patient care is health data management. Earning an online bachelor’s in health information management can lead to roles managing patient data, healthcare compliance, and information technology in medical settings. For those seeking a fast route into the medical field, medical billing and coding cost considerations make online certifications highly accessible, often with quick completion times and direct entry into healthcare administration.

Exploring these online degrees can help you find a career path in medicine or healthcare that fits your goals, timeline, and interests.

Best Scientists Citing Peter J. Kudenchuk

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles