World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 47 3346 3079 1615 1463 111 11224

Richard T. Campbell publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Richard T. Campbell between 1972 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Richard T. Campbell published across 54 years, from 1972 to 2025, averaging 2.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2009. 1 of the 119 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2009. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 2 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 1 publication 1980: 4 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 2 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 1 publication 1989: 3 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 2 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 4 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 9 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 3 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 4 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 1 publication
1972 2025

119 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Richard T. Campbell: publications per year, 1972 to 2025
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 2
1977 4
1978 1
1979 1
1980 4
1981 0
1982 0
1983 2
1984 2
1985 2
1986 2
1987 4
1988 1
1989 3
1990 1
1991 2
1992 0
1993 0
1994 1
1995 1
1996 2
1997 1
1998 0
1999 1
2000 0
2001 3
2002 2
2003 2
2004 1
2005 4
2006 5
2007 6
2008 7
2009 9
2010 5
2011 5
2012 5
2013 1
2014 3
2015 5
2016 2
2017 1
2018 4
2019 4
2020 3
2021 0
2022 1
2023 2
2024 0
2025 1
Total 119
Download as CSV

Richard T. Campbell publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard T. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 104–113 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 111 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406 111
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Richard T. Campbell D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard T. Campbell sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251 47
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Richard T. Campbell is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Chicago in the United States. Their research is primarily situated within the field of Medicine, with a focused contribution to Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Cognitive Neuroscience, and Pathology and Forensic Medicine.

The scientist's work covers a range of topics related to cancer detection, diet, and public health. Major research topics include:

  • Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
  • Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Genetic factors in colorectal cancer
  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Richard T. Campbell illustrate a varied scope of study within these domains. Notable publications include:

  • Spatial access to primary care providers and colorectal cancer-specific survival in Cook County, Illinois, 2020, published in Cancer Medicine
  • Gender- and Race-Based Differences in Barriers and Facilitators to Early Detection of Colon Cancer, 2020, Journal of Women s Health
  • Relationship Between Grocery Shopping Frequency and Home- and Individual-Level Diet Quality Among Low-Income Racial or Ethnic Minority Households With Preschool-Aged Children, 2020, Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
  • A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating Essential Oils for Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy, 2023, Pain Management Nursing
  • Validation of a self-report home food availability checklist against in-home food inventories conducted in low-income Black/African American and Hispanic/Latinx households with preschool-age children, 2022, Appetite

The venues where these works have been published frequently include:

  • Journal of Women s Health
  • Cancer Medicine
  • Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
  • Pain Management Nursing
  • Appetite

Richard T. Campbell has collaborated with multiple co-authors, with whom they have published several papers. Frequent collaborators include:

  • Marian Fitzgibbon
  • Linda Schiffer
  • Angela Kong
  • Katherine C. Brewer
  • Nadine Peacock

Best Publications

  • Male circumcision for HIV prevention in young men in Kisumu, Kenya: a randomised controlled trial

    Robert C Bailey;Stephen Moses;Corette B Parker;Kawango Agot

  • Fruit and Vegetable Intake in African Americans : Income and Store Characteristics

    Shannon N. Zenk;Amy J. Schulz;Teretha Hollis-Neely;Richard T. Campbell

  • Alternative models of the stress buffering hypothesis.

    Richard Landerman;Linda K. George;Richard T. Campbell;Dan G. Blazer

  • A finite mixture model of growth trajectories of adolescent alcohol use: predictors and consequences.

    Craig R. Colder;Richard T. Campbell;Erin Ruel;Jean L. Richardson

  • From networks to populations: the development and application of respondent-driven sampling among IDUs and Latino gay men.

    Jesus Ramirez-Valles;Douglas D. Heckathorn;Raquel Vázquez;Rafael M. Diaz

  • Impact of the Fit and Strong Intervention on Older Adults With Osteoarthritis

    Susan L. Hughes;Rachel B. Seymour;Richard Campbell;Naomi Pollak

  • Status Attainment Research: End of the Beginning or Beginning of the End.

    Richard T. Campbell

  • Black-White Differences in the Educational Attainment Process.

    Alan C. Kerckhoff;Richard T. Campbell

  • Identifying trajectories of adolescent smoking: an application of latent growth mixture modeling.

    Craig R. Colder;Paras Mehta;Kevin Balanda;Richard T. Campbell

  • Race, Control, Mastery, and Caregiver Distress

    Baila Miller;Richard T. Campbell;Carol J. Farran;Julie E. Kaufman

  • Long-Term Impact of Fit and Strong! on Older Adults With Osteoarthritis

    Susan L. Hughes;Rachel B. Seymour;Richard T. Campbell;Gail Huber

  • Use of tobacco cessation treatments among young adult smokers: 2005 National Health Interview Survey.

    Susan J. Curry;Amy K. Sporer;Oksana Pugach;Richard T. Campbell

  • Status Attainment and Status Maintenance: A Study of Stratification in Old Age

    John C. Henretta;Richard T. Campbell

  • HIV Infection, Sexual Risk Behavior, and Substance Use Among Latino Gay and Bisexual Men and Transgender Persons

    Jesus Ramirez-Valles;Dalia Garcia;Richard T. Campbell;Rafael M. Diaz

  • Intergenerational solidarity: an examination of a theoretical model.

    Maxine P. Atkinson;Vira R. Kivett;Richard T. Campbell

  • Risk compensation is not associated with male circumcision in Kisumu Kenya: A multi-faceted assessment of men enrolled in a randomized controlled trial.

    Christine L. Mattson;Richard T. Campbell;Robert C. Bailey;Kawango Agot

  • Risk of Nursing Home Admission Among Older Americans: Does States' Spending on Home- and Community-Based Services Matter?

    Naoko Muramatsu;Hongjun Yin;Richard T. Campbell;Ruby L. Hoyem

  • Modeling mood variation associated with smoking: an application of a heterogeneous mixed-effects model for analysis of ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data.

    Donald Hedeker;Robin J. Mermelstein;Michael L. Berbaum;Richard T. Campbell

  • Social integration and health: community involvement, stigmatized identities, and sexual risk in Latino sexual minorities.

    Jesus Ramirez-Valles;Lisa M. Kuhns;Richard T. Campbell;Rafael M. Diaz

  • Best-Practice Physical Activity Programs for Older Adults: Findings From the National Impact Study

    Susan L. Hughes;Rachel B. Seymour;Richard T. Campbell;Nancy Whitelaw

  • Sociological Methodology 1985.

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

Brian R. Flay
Brian R. Flay Boise State University
Carol Estwing Ferrans
Carol Estwing Ferrans University of Illinois at Chicago
Robin J. Mermelstein
Robin J. Mermelstein University of Illinois at Chicago
Jeckoniah O. Ndinya-Achola
Jeckoniah O. Ndinya-Achola University of Nairobi
Shannon N. Zenk
Shannon N. Zenk University of Illinois at Chicago
John C. Henretta
John C. Henretta University of Florida
Stephen Moses
Stephen Moses University of Manitoba
Douglas D. Heckathorn
Douglas D. Heckathorn Cornell University
Rafael M. Diaz
Rafael M. Diaz San Francisco State University
Craig R. Colder
Craig R. Colder University at Buffalo, State University of New York

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens up diverse career opportunities in counseling, therapy, psychology, and social work. Many students now pursue these professions through flexible, accessible online programs. For those interested in counseling, exploring cacrep accredited universities ensures you receive a high-quality education recognized nationwide.

Specializing further, you might consider mft masters programs, which prepare you to support families and couples through life’s challenges. Alternatively, online psychology degrees offer broad insight into human behavior and open doors to careers in mental health, education, and business sectors.

If your passion lies in social advocacy and helping communities, msw programs with high acceptance rate can help you start your journey toward becoming a licensed social worker, even if your academic background is non-traditional. No matter your chosen path, these online options make it easier than ever to launch or advance your career in the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Richard T. Campbell

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles