World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 48 4677 4303 1807 1619 178 8976

Laurence C. Eisenlohr publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Laurence C. Eisenlohr between 1980 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Laurence C. Eisenlohr published across 47 years, from 1980 to 2026, averaging 4.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2018. 12 of the 206 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2018. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 10 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 8 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 8 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 16 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 4 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 8 publications 2025: 11 publications 2026: 1 publication
1980 2026

206 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Laurence C. Eisenlohr: publications per year, 1980 to 2026
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 1
1988 2
1989 4
1990 2
1991 1
1992 2
1993 2
1994 2
1995 4
1996 6
1997 7
1998 2
1999 3
2000 4
2001 5
2002 4
2003 4
2004 3
2005 5
2006 10
2007 5
2008 5
2009 1
2010 8
2011 5
2012 8
2013 5
2014 8
2015 4
2016 2
2017 6
2018 16
2019 7
2020 10
2021 4
2022 13
2023 5
2024 8
2025 11
2026 1
Total 206
Download as CSV

Laurence C. Eisenlohr publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurence C. Eisenlohr sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 175–184 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 178 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276 178
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Laurence C. Eisenlohr D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Laurence C. Eisenlohr sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106 48
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Laurence C. Eisenlohr is affiliated with the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia in the United States. Their research spans several interconnected areas within immunology and medicine, focusing on the cellular and molecular mechanisms that underlie immune responses.

Their primary fields of study include:

  • Immunology and Microbiology
  • Medicine

Within these areas, Eisenlohr's work emphasizes subfields such as:

  • Immunology
  • Molecular Biology
  • Epidemiology
  • Genetics
  • Oncology

The scientist's research concentrates on several main topics, including:

  • Immune Cell Function and Interaction
  • Immunotherapy and Immune Responses
  • T-cell and B-cell Immunology
  • Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • CAR-T cell therapy research
  • Poxvirus research and outbreaks
  • Influenza Virus Research Studies

Eisenlohr has published extensively in various reputable scientific venues. The most frequent publication outlets include:

  • The Journal of Immunology
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Molecular Immunology
  • Nature
  • Nature Communications

Among recent research publications authored by or involving Laurence C. Eisenlohr are the following papers:

  • "SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccines Foster Potent Antigen-Specific Germinal Center Responses Associated with Neutralizing Antibody Generation" (2020), published in Immunity
  • "A Single Immunization with Nucleoside-Modified mRNA Vaccines Elicits Strong Cellular and Humoral Immune Responses against SARS-CoV-2 in Mice" (2020), published in Immunity
  • "STAT3-BDNF-TrkB signalling promotes alveolar epithelial regeneration after lung injury" (2020), published in Nature Cell Biology
  • "RETRACTED ARTICLE: Cross-HLA targeting of intracellular oncoproteins with peptide-centric CARs" (2021), published in Nature
  • "Targeting of intracellular oncoproteins with peptide-centric CARs" (2023), published in Nature

Frequent collaborators of Eisenlohr include:

  • Elise Peauroi
  • Michael J. Hogan
  • Stephen D. Carro
  • Norbert Pardi
  • Katherine S. Forsyth

Best Publications

  • The AIM2 inflammasome is critical for innate immunity to Francisella tularensis

    Teresa Fernandes-Alnemri;Je-Wook Yu;Je-Wook Yu;Christine Juliana;Leobaldo Solorzano

  • Nucleoside-modified mRNA vaccines induce potent T follicular helper and germinal center B cell responses.

    Norbert Pardi;Michael J. Hogan;Martin S. Naradikian;Kaela Parkhouse

  • Intratumoral recombinant GM-CSF-encoding virus as gene therapy in patients with cutaneous melanoma.

    Michael J Mastrangelo;Henry C Maguire;Laurence C Eisenlohr;Carol E Laughlin

  • SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccines Foster Potent Antigen-Specific Germinal Center Responses Associated with Neutralizing Antibody Generation.

    Katlyn Lederer;Diana Castaño;Diana Castaño;Daniela Gómez Atria;Thomas H. Oguin

  • A Single Immunization with Nucleoside-Modified mRNA Vaccines Elicits Strong Cellular and Humoral Immune Responses against SARS-CoV-2 in Mice.

    Dorottya Laczkó;Michael J. Hogan;Sushila A. Toulmin;Philip Hicks

  • Antigen processing in vivo and the elicitation of primary CTL responses.

    Nicholas P. Restifo;Igor Bačík;Kari R. Irvine;Jonathan W. Yewdell

  • Impaired Assembly yet Normal Trafficking of MHC Class I Molecules in Tapasin Mutant Mice

    Andres G Grandea;Tatiana N Golovina;Sara E Hamilton;Venkataraman Sriram

  • Flanking sequences influence the presentation of an endogenously synthesized peptide to cytotoxic T lymphocytes.

    L C Eisenlohr;J W Yewdell;J R Bennink

  • MHC affinity, peptide liberation, T cell repertoire, and immunodominance all contribute to the paucity of MHC class I-restricted peptides recognized by antiviral CTL.

    Y Deng;J W Yewdell;L C Eisenlohr;J R Bennink

  • The Immunogenicity of a New Human Minor Histocompatibility Antigen Results from Differential Antigen Processing

    Anthony G. Brickner;Edus H. Warren;Edus H. Warren;Jennifer A. Caldwell;Yoshiki Akatsuka;Yoshiki Akatsuka

  • The induction of virus-specific CTL as a function of increasing epitope expression: responses rise steadily until excessively high levels of epitope are attained.

    Wherry Ej;Puorro Ka;Porgador A;Eisenlohr Lc

  • Antigen presentation requires transport of MHC class I molecules from the endoplasmic reticulum.

    Josephine H. Cox;Jonathan W. Yewdell;Laurence C. Eisenlohr;Philip R. Johnson

  • A cytosolic pathway for MHC class II–restricted antigen processing that is proteasome and TAP dependent

    Mona K Tewari;Gomathinayagam Sinnathamby;Deepa Rajagopal;Laurence C Eisenlohr

  • The HA-2 minor histocompatibility antigen is derived from a diallelic gene encoding a novel human class I myosin protein.

    R. A. Pierce;E. D. Field;T. Mutis;T. N. Golovina

  • The adenovirus capsid protein hexon contains a highly conserved human CD4+ T-cell epitope

    Melanie Olive;Laurence Eisenlohr;Neal Flomenberg;Susan Hsu

  • Dependence of Both Spontaneous and Antibody-Dependent, Granule Exocytosis-Mediated NK Cell Cytotoxicity on Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinases

    Rossana Trotta;Kristin A. Puorro;Marino Paroli;Livio Azzoni

  • The minor histocompatibility antigen HA-3 arises from differential proteasome-mediated cleavage of the lymphoid blast crisis (Lbc) oncoprotein.

    Eric Spierings;Anthony G. Brickner;Jennifer A. Caldwell;Suzanne Zegveld

  • STAT3–BDNF–TrkB signalling promotes alveolar epithelial regeneration after lung injury

    Andrew J. Paris;Katharina E. Hayer;Joseph H. Oved;Daphne C. Avgousti

  • Ribosomal scanning past the primary initiation codon as a mechanism for expression of CTL epitopes encoded in alternative reading frames.

    T. N. J. Bullock;L. C. Eisenlohr

  • Generation of CD8+ T Cell Memory in Response to Low, High, and Excessive Levels of Epitope

    E. John Wherry;Michael J. McElhaugh;Laurence C. Eisenlohr

  • Point mutation flanking a CTL epitope ablates in vitro and in vivo recognition of a full-length viral protein.

    A J Yellen-Shaw;E J Wherry;G C Dubois;L C Eisenlohr

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott A. Waldman
Scott A. Waldman Thomas Jefferson University
E. John Wherry
E. John Wherry University of Pennsylvania
Matthias J. Schnell
Matthias J. Schnell Thomas Jefferson University
Jack R. Bennink
Jack R. Bennink National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Walter Gerhard
Walter Gerhard The Wistar Institute
John F. Atkins
John F. Atkins University College Cork
Jonathan W. Yewdell
Jonathan W. Yewdell National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Josephine H. Cox
Josephine H. Cox National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Jaclyn A. Biegel
Jaclyn A. Biegel University of Southern California
Drew Weissman
Drew Weissman University of Pennsylvania

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring microbiology often leads students to consider related online degrees that can complement their scientific expertise. For those interested in the healthcare side, numerous what medical degrees can i get online options are available, allowing flexibility and accessibility while pursuing advanced qualifications.

Public health is another popular pathway, especially with the rise of accessible programs. Students may find it helpful to explore some of the easy admission online mph programs that offer straightforward entry requirements and support for working professionals.

For graduates interested in child development and support roles, careers like becoming a child life specialist are viable. Understanding the child life specialist salary with bachelor degree can help gauge the financial outlook and career growth opportunities in this field.

Importantly, many online programs are designed to be inclusive. Students with challenging backgrounds can explore college degrees for felons, providing pathways to education and career advancement regardless of past records.

Best Scientists Citing Laurence C. Eisenlohr

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles