World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
44
Citations
12743
World Ranking
4960
National Ranking
396

Gary W. Luck publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary W. Luck sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 115 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Gary W. Luck D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gary W. Luck sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gary W. Luck is affiliated with Charles Sturt University in Australia.

The available data does not list specific research papers, coauthors, publication venues, book publications, fields of study, subfields, or main topics of work associated with Gary W. Luck.

No awards or honors have been recorded for this individual.

This profile reflects the currently accessible information on Gary W. Luck's academic and scientific contributions.

Best Publications

  • Opinion: Why protect nature? Rethinking values and the environment

    Kai M. A. Chan;Patricia Balvanera;Karina Benessaiah;Mollie Chapman

  • Effects of household dynamics on resource consumption and biodiversity

    Jianguo Liu;Gretchen C. Daily;Paul R. Ehrlich;Gary W. Luck

  • Population diversity and ecosystem services

    Gary W. Luck;Gretchen C. Daily;Paul R. Ehrlich

  • A checklist for ecological management of landscapes for conservation

    David Lindenmayer;Richard J. Hobbs;Rebecca Montague-Drake;Jason Alexandra

  • Pinpointing and preventing imminent extinctions

    Taylor H. Ricketts;Eric Dinerstein;Tim Boucher;Thomas M. Brooks

  • A review of the relationships between human population density and biodiversity.

    Gary W. Luck

  • Ecosystem services and ethics

    Kurt Jax;Kurt Jax;David N. Barton;Kai M.A. Chan;Rudolf de Groot

  • Quantifying the Contribution of Organisms to the Provision of Ecosystem Services

    Gary W. Luck;Richard Harrington;Paula A. Harrison;Claire Kremen

  • Socio-Economics and Vegetation Change in Urban Ecosystems: Patterns in Space and Time

    Gary W. Luck;Lisa T. Smallbone;Rachel O’Brien

  • Improving the application of vertebrate trait‐based frameworks to the study of ecosystem services

    Gary W. Luck;Sandra Lavorel;Sue McIntyre;Katrina Lumb

  • Tropical countryside bird assemblages: richness, composition, and foraging differ by landscape context

    Gary W. Luck;Gretchen C. Daily

  • Relations between Urban Bird and Plant Communities and Human Well‐Being and Connection to Nature

    Gary Luck;Penelope Davidson;Dianne Boxall;Lisa Smallbone

  • Identifying and prioritising services in European terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems

    Paula A. Harrison;Marie Vandewalle;Martin T. Sykes;Pam M. Berry

  • Ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation: concepts and a glossary

    Richard Harrington;Christian Anton;Terence P. Dawson;Francesco de Bello

  • Alleviating spatial conflict between people and biodiversity.

    Gary W. Luck;Taylor H. Ricketts;Gretchen C. Daily;Marc Imhoff

  • Changes in bird functional diversity across multiple land uses: interpretations of functional redundancy depend on functional group identity.

    Gary W. Luck;Andrew Carter;Lisa Smallbone

  • Synthesis: Thresholds in conservation and management

    David Lindenmayer;Gary Luck

  • Ethical Considerations in On-Ground Applications of the Ecosystem Services Concept

    Gary W. Luck;Kai M. A. Chan;Uta Eser;Erik Gómez-Baggethun

  • The relationships between net primary productivity, human population density and species conservation

    Gary W. Luck

  • Primary productivity and species richness: relationships among functional guilds, residency groups and vagility classes at multiple spatial scales

    S.-A. Bailey;M. C. Horner-Devine;G. Luck;L. A. Moore

  • A conceptual framework to analyse the effects of environmental change on ecosystem services

    Paula Harrison;M Rounsevell;G Luck;R Harrington

Frequent Co-Authors

Kai M. A. Chan
Kai M. A. Chan University of British Columbia
Paula A. Harrison
Paula A. Harrison Lancaster University
Richard Harrington
Richard Harrington Rothamsted Research
Martin T. Sykes
Martin T. Sykes Lund University
Erik Gómez-Baggethun
Erik Gómez-Baggethun Norwegian University of Life Sciences
Chris R. Dickman
Chris R. Dickman University of Sydney
Christian K. Feld
Christian K. Feld University of Duisburg-Essen
Bryan G. Norton
Bryan G. Norton Georgia Institute of Technology
Hugh P. Possingham
Hugh P. Possingham University of Queensland
Gretchen C. Daily
Gretchen C. Daily Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution can lead to diverse and fulfilling career opportunities across research, environmental consulting, nonprofits, and education. For those wishing to broaden their options or shift focus, related fields in the human and life sciences can offer alternative or complementary careers.

Many students consider online degrees for their flexibility and affordability. For example, you might be interested in the most affordable master's in counseling, which equips graduates with skills to support mental health and well-being. Similarly, if you are drawn to research or clinical settings, an online masters in clinical psychology can open doors to evaluation, therapy, or policy work.

Another option is to pursue an online degree in human services, which prepares you for roles aiding individuals and communities in various contexts. If you have an education background, you may also be wondering, can you become a speech pathologist with an education degree? Transitioning from teaching to speech-language pathology is a viable route and may complement an interest in human biology and communication.

These online pathways offer flexibility and the potential to tailor your career while building on your interest in ecology, evolution, and related disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing Gary W. Luck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles