World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 57 1463 1343 384 335 274 10405

Kenneth J. Moore publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kenneth J. Moore between 1980 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kenneth J. Moore published across 43 years, from 1980 to 2022, averaging 6.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2020. 9 of the 282 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2020. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 3 publications 1986: 5 publications 1987: 8 publications 1988: 9 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 8 publications 1992: 4 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 13 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 13 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 13 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 3 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 12 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 2 publications
1980 2022

282 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kenneth J. Moore: publications per year, 1980 to 2022
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 3
1986 5
1987 8
1988 9
1989 4
1990 4
1991 8
1992 4
1993 4
1994 2
1995 13
1996 6
1997 9
1998 6
1999 3
2000 8
2001 13
2002 9
2003 13
2004 10
2005 6
2006 7
2007 11
2008 7
2009 3
2010 4
2011 9
2012 7
2013 7
2014 10
2015 12
2016 10
2017 9
2018 9
2019 4
2020 15
2021 7
2022 2
Total 282
Download as CSV

Kenneth J. Moore publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth J. Moore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 271–275 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 274 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30 274
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Kenneth J. Moore D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kenneth J. Moore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88 57
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2008 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Agronomy
  • Agriculture
  • Ecology

His primary areas of investigation include Agronomy, Forage, Panicum virgatum, Poaceae and Botany. All of his Agronomy and Bromus inermis, Pasture, Fodder, Perennial plant and Grazing investigations are sub-components of the entire Agronomy study. His Forage research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Hay and Germination.

His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Crop yield and Thinopyrum intermedium. Kenneth J. Moore combines subjects such as Andropogon, Cultivar and Germplasm with his study of Panicum virgatum. His work on Lignin, Neutral Detergent Fiber and Developmental morphology as part of general Botany research is frequently linked to Axillary bud, bridging the gap between disciplines.

His most cited work include:

  • Describing and Quantifying Growth Stages of Perennial Forage Grasses (410 citations)
  • Biomass yield and quality of 20 switchgrass populations in southern Iowa, USA. (276 citations)
  • Binary Legume–Grass Mixtures Improve Forage Yield, Quality, and Seasonal Distribution (200 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Kenneth J. Moore mostly deals with Agronomy, Forage, Biomass, Agroforestry and Panicum virgatum. His study in Dry matter, Pasture, Grazing, Perennial plant and Poaceae is carried out as part of his Agronomy studies. His studies in Forage integrate themes in fields like Field experiment, Fodder and Cultivar.

His Biomass research integrates issues from Biofuel, Crop yield and Growing season. In his study, Grassland is inextricably linked to Agriculture, which falls within the broad field of Agroforestry. His Panicum virgatum study frequently links to other fields, such as Andropogon.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Agronomy (67.43%)
  • Forage (25.67%)
  • Biomass (13.79%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2021)?

  • Agronomy (67.43%)
  • Biomass (13.79%)
  • Agroforestry (13.41%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His main research concerns Agronomy, Biomass, Agroforestry, Kenaf and Bioenergy. His Agronomy study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Panicum virgatum, Soil quality and Temperate climate. Kenneth J. Moore has researched Panicum virgatum in several fields, including Andropogon and Ecotype.

His work deals with themes such as Biofuel, Cultivar and Growing season, which intersect with Biomass. His research investigates the connection between Agroforestry and topics such as Cropping system that intersect with issues in Cropping. His Kenaf study combines topics in areas such as Agriculture, Hibiscus, Horticulture and Pyrolysis.

Between 2013 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Analysis of Combined Experiments Revisited (84 citations)
  • Carbohydrates and Forage Quality (76 citations)
  • Evaluating APSIM Maize, Soil Water, Soil Nitrogen, Manure, and Soil Temperature Modules in the Midwestern United States (70 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Agriculture
  • Agronomy
  • Ecology

His primary scientific interests are in Agronomy, Biomass, Bioenergy, Crop yield and Agroforestry. His Crop rotation study, which is part of a larger body of work in Agronomy, is frequently linked to Information storage, bridging the gap between disciplines. His studies deal with areas such as Warm season, Cultivar and Developmental morphology as well as Biomass.

The Crop yield study combines topics in areas such as Soil carbon, Sweet sorghum, Mean squared error, Range and Biofuel. His Agroforestry study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Perennial plant, Cropping system and Soil quality. His Panicum virgatum research includes elements of Ecotype and Growing season.

Best Publications

  • Describing and Quantifying Growth Stages of Perennial Forage Grasses

    K. J. Moore;Lowell E. Moser;Kenneth P. Vogel;Steven S. Waller

  • Lignin and fiber digestion.

    Kenneth J. Moore;Hans-Joachim G. Jung

  • Binary Legume–Grass Mixtures Improve Forage Yield, Quality, and Seasonal Distribution

    Byron Sleugh;Kenneth J. Moore;J. Ronald George;Edward C. Brummer

  • Biomass yield and quality of 20 switchgrass populations in southern Iowa, USA.

    R Lemus;E.Charles Brummer;Kenneth J Moore;Neil E Molstad

  • Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization on Biomass Yield and Quality in Large Fields of Established Switchgrass in Southern Iowa, USA

    Roque Lemus;E. Charles Brummer;C. Lee Burras;Kenneth J. Moore

  • Analysis of Combined Experiments Revisited

    Kenneth J. Moore;Philip M. Dixon

  • Quantifying Developmental Morphology of Perennial Grasses

    K. J. Moore;Lowell E. Moser

  • Determination of pasture biomass using four indirect methods

    Keith R. Harmoney;Kenneth J. Moore;J. Ronald George;E. Charles Brummer

  • Carbohydrates and Forage Quality

    K. J. Moore;R. D. Hatfield

  • Evaluating APSIM Maize, Soil Water, Soil Nitrogen, Manure, and Soil Temperature Modules in the Midwestern United States

    Sotirios V. Archontoulis;Fernando E. Miguez;Kenneth J. Moore

  • Brown Midrib Sorghum Silage for Midlactation Dairy Cows

    R. J. Grant;S. G. Haddad;K. J. Moore;Jeffrey F. Pedersen

  • Genotype Effects and Genotype by Environment Interactions for Traits of Elite Switchgrass Populations

    Andrew A. Hopkins;Kenneth P. Vogel;K. J. Moore;K. D. Johnson

  • Nitrogen influences biomass and nutrient partitioning by perennial, warm-season grasses.

    Andrew H. Heggenstaller;Kenneth J. Moore;Matt Liebman;Robert P. Anex

  • Modeling Long-Term Corn Yield Response to Nitrogen Rate and Crop Rotation

    Laila Alejandra Puntel;John E. Sawyer;Daniel W. Barker;Ranae Dietzel

  • A methodology and an optimization tool to calibrate phenology of short-day species included in the APSIM PLANT model: Application to soybean

    Sotirios V. Archontoulis;Fernando E. Miguez;Kenneth J. Moore

  • Genetic mapping and analysis of quantitative trait loci affecting fiber and lignin content in maize

    A J Cardinal;M Lee;K J Moore

  • Effect of previous crops on crown rot and yield of durum and bread wheat in northern NSW

    J. A. Kirkegaard;S. Simpfendorfer;J. Holland;R. Bambach

  • Persistence of Perennial Cool-Season Grass and Legume Cultivars under Continuous Grazing by Beef Cattle

    E. Charles Brummer;Kenneth J. Moore

  • An introduction to grassland agriculture

    Robert F. Barnes;Curtis Jerry Nelson;Michael Collins;Kenneth J. Moore

  • Genotypic variability and genotype × environment interactions among switchgrass accessions from the midwestern USA

    Andrew A. Hopkins;Kenneth P. Vogel;K. J. Moore;K. D. Johnson

  • Alfalfa Yield and Quality as Influenced by Establishment Method

    Michael D. Hoy;Kenneth J. Moore;J. Ronald George;E. Charles Brummer

  • Vegetation diversity, growth, quality and decomposition in managed grasslands

    Todd A White;David J Barker;Kenneth J Moore

  • Composition of native warm-season grasses for bioenergy production in response to nitrogen fertilization rate and harvest date.

    Naroon Waramit;Kenneth J. Moore;Andrew H. Heggenstaller

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew W. Lenssen
Andrew W. Lenssen Iowa State University
E. Charles Brummer
E. Charles Brummer University of California, Davis
Sotirios V. Archontoulis
Sotirios V. Archontoulis Iowa State University
Kenneth P. Vogel
Kenneth P. Vogel Agricultural Research Service
Lowell E. Moser
Lowell E. Moser University of Nebraska–Lincoln
David A. Laird
David A. Laird Iowa State University
Robert B. Mitchell
Robert B. Mitchell US Department of Agriculture
Tom L. Richard
Tom L. Richard Pennsylvania State University
Philip M. Dixon
Philip M. Dixon Iowa State University
Jeffrey F. Pedersen
Jeffrey F. Pedersen University of Nebraska–Lincoln

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Kenneth J. Moore

Trending Scientists