World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
46
Citations
8323
World Ranking
6071
National Ranking
2201

Tom L. Richard publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom L. Richard sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 218 publications — 70th percentile

70% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Tom L. Richard D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tom L. Richard sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tom L. Richard is affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Environmental Science, Agricultural and Biological Sciences, and Engineering. Within these areas, their work delves into specific subfields such as Agronomy and Crop Science, Biomedical Engineering, Ecology, Soil Science, and Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering.

The scientist's research covers several key topics, including:

  • Bioenergy crop production and management
  • Agriculture sustainability and environmental impact
  • Anaerobic digestion and biogas production
  • Biofuel production and bioconversion
  • Soil carbon and nitrogen dynamics
  • Composting and vermicomposting techniques
  • Microbial metabolic engineering and bioproduction

Tom L. Richard has published frequently in venues such as Environmental Research Letters, Journal of the ASABE, Agronomy Journal, and Questions de communication, with additional publications in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by the scientist include:

  • Robust paths to net greenhouse gas mitigation and negative emissions via advanced biofuels, 2020, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Meeting global challenges with regenerative agriculture producing food and energy, 2021, Nature Sustainability
  • Redefining marginal land for bioenergy crop production, 2021, GCB Bioenergy
  • Techno-economic Analysis and Life Cycle Assessment of an Integrated Wastewater-Derived Duckweed Biorefinery, 2021, ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering
  • Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on pharmaceuticals in wastewater treated for beneficial reuse: Two case studies in central Pennsylvania, 2022, Journal of Environmental Quality

The scientist collaborates regularly with several co-authors, including Stephanie M. Herbstritt, Peter O'Brien, Bryan D. Emmett, Robert W. Malone, and John Field.

Best Publications

  • Challenges in scaling up biofuels infrastructure.

    Tom L. Richard

  • Moisture Relationships in Composting Processes

    Tom L. Richard;H.V.M. (Bert) Hamelers;Adrie Veeken;Tiago Silva

  • Simultaneous Cellulose Degradation and Electricity Production by Enterobacter cloacae in a Microbial Fuel Cell

    Farzaneh Rezaei;Defeng Xing;Rachel Wagner;John M. Regan

  • Carbon, nutrient, and mass loss during composting

    S. M. Tiquia;T. L. Richard;M. S. Honeyman

  • Substrate-Enhanced Microbial Fuel Cells for Improved Remote Power Generation from Sediment-Based Systems

    Farzaneh Rezaei;Thomas Lehman Richard;Rachel Alice Brennan;Bruce Ernest Logan

  • Management and Maintenance of Earthen Manure Structures: Implications and Opportunities for Water Quality Protection

    T. L. Richard;C. C. Hinrichs

  • Review: Role of chemistry, mechanics, and transport on well integrity in CO2 storage environments

    Susan A. Carroll;William J. Carey;David Dzombak;Nicolas J. Huerta

  • Tile drain sampling of preferential flow on a field scale

    Tom L. Richard;Tammo S. Steenhuis

  • Energy Use and Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Crop Production Using the Farm Energy Analysis Tool

    Gustavo G. T. Camargo;Matthew R. Ryan;Tom L. Richard

  • Air-filled porosity and permeability relationships during solid-state fermentation

    Thomas Lehman Richard;Adrie H.M. Veeken;Vinnie De Wilde;H. V. M.hamelers

  • Determination of thermal properties of composting bulking materials

    Heekwon Ahn;T. J. Sauer;T. L. Richard;Thomas D. Glanville

  • Mass and thermal balance during composting of a poultry manure—Wood shavings mixture at different aeration rates

    H.K. Ahn;T.L. Richard;H.L. Choi

  • Take a Closer Look: Biofuels Can Support Environmental, Economic and Social Goals

    Bruce E. Dale;James E. Anderson;Robert C. Brown;Steven Csonka

  • Robust paths to net greenhouse gas mitigation and negative emissions via advanced biofuels.

    John L. Field;Tom L. Richard;Erica A. H. Smithwick;Hao Cai

  • Compost mineralization in soil as a function of composting process conditions

    Cynthia A. Cambardella;T. L. Richard;Ann E. Russell

  • Laboratory determination of compost physical parameters for modeling of airflow characteristics

    H. K. Ahn;Thomas Lehman Richard;T. D. Glanville

  • Municipal solid waste composting: Physical and biological processing

    Tom L. Richard

  • Effects of laccase on lignin depolymerization and enzymatic hydrolysis of ensiled corn stover

    Qin Chen;Megan N. Marshall;Scott M. Geib;Ming Tien

  • Preferential movement of pesticides and tracers in agricultural soils

    Tainmo S. Steenhuis;Ward Staubitz;Marc S. Andreini;Jan Surface

  • Corn Response to Composting and Time of Application of Solid Swine Manure

    Terrance D. Loecke;Matt Liebman;Cynthia A. Cambardella;Thomas Lehman Richard

Frequent Co-Authors

Matt Liebman
Matt Liebman Iowa State University
Cynthia A. Cambardella
Cynthia A. Cambardella Agricultural Research Service
Lee R. Lynd
Lee R. Lynd Dartmouth College
Charles T. Anderson
Charles T. Anderson Pennsylvania State University
Kenneth J. Moore
Kenneth J. Moore Iowa State University
Tammo S. Steenhuis
Tammo S. Steenhuis Cornell University
Bruce E. Logan
Bruce E. Logan Pennsylvania State University
Clarence Alan Rotz
Clarence Alan Rotz Agricultural Research Service
Philip M. Dixon
Philip M. Dixon Iowa State University
Gong Chen
Gong Chen Nankai University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students pursuing Environmental Sciences, expanding qualifications through online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many professionals explore programs like online ed d programs without dissertation to further specialize in education leadership or environmental policy without the intensive dissertation process.

Transitioning between degrees is also common, and options like eds to edd programs provide a streamlined pathway for educators aiming to reach doctoral levels while maintaining a focus in environmental education or sustainability.

For those interested in social aspects of environmental issues, the cheapest dsw program can offer an affordable route into social work with environmental justice implications, integrating community welfare with ecological awareness.

Additionally, affordable and flexible options like online general studies degree affordable programs enable students to tailor their studies across environmental science and related disciplines, supporting interdisciplinary careers in sustainability, policy, and research.

Best Scientists Citing Tom L. Richard

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles