World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
37
Citations
17572
World Ranking
8654
National Ranking
3672

Jorge J. Palop publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jorge J. Palop sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 69 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jorge J. Palop D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jorge J. Palop sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jorge J. Palop is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research mainly focuses on Neuroscience, with significant contributions to Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, and Medicine. The scientist's work extensively covers Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Physiology, Neurology, and Cognitive Neuroscience as subfields.

Their primary research topics include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research, Alzheimer's disease research and treatments, Neural dynamics and brain function, CRISPR and Genetic Engineering, Neuroscience and Neural Engineering, Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders, as well as Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms.

Jorge J. Palop has published multiple papers in various scientific venues. Some notable recent publications include:

  • A second X chromosome contributes to resilience in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease, 2020, Science Translational Medicine
  • Microglial Gi-dependent dynamics regulate brain network hyperexcitability, 2020, Nature Neuroscience
  • Identifying behavioral structure from deep variational embeddings of animal motion, 2022, Communications Biology
  • Novel App knock-in mouse model shows key features of amyloid pathology and reveals profound metabolic dysregulation of microglia, 2022, Molecular Neurodegeneration
  • GluN2A NMDA Receptor Enhancement Improves Brain Oscillations, Synchrony, and Cognitive Functions in Dravet Syndrome and Alzheimer's Disease Models, 2020, Cell Reports

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Jorge J. Palop include Keran Ma, Stephanie R. Miller, Chun Chen, Reuben Thomas, and Patrick Honma. These collaborators have contributed to multiple studies alongside Palop.

Jorge J. Palop's research has been featured repeatedly in some scientific venues, including bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Nature Neuroscience, Molecular Neurodegeneration, Cell Reports, and Alzheimer's & Dementia.

Best Publications

  • Reducing Endogenous Tau Ameliorates Amyloid ß-Induced Deficits in an Alzheimer's Disease Mouse Model

    Erik D. Roberson;Kimberly Scearce-Levie;Jorge J. Palop;Fengrong Yan

  • Amyloid-[beta]-induced neuronal dysfunction in Alzheimer's disease: from synapses toward neural networks

    Jorge J Palop;Lennart Mucke

  • Aberrant Excitatory Neuronal Activity and Compensatory Remodeling of Inhibitory Hippocampal Circuits in Mouse Models of Alzheimer's Disease

    Jorge J. Palop;Jeannie Chin;Erik D. Roberson;Jun Wang

  • Inhibitory Interneuron Deficit Links Altered Network Activity and Cognitive Dysfunction in Alzheimer Model

    Laure Verret;Edward O. Mann;Giao B. Hang;Albert M.I. Barth

  • Network abnormalities and interneuron dysfunction in Alzheimer disease

    Jorge J. Palop;Lennart Mucke

  • Epilepsy and Cognitive Impairments in Alzheimer Disease

    Jorge J. Palop;Lennart Mucke

  • A network dysfunction perspective on neurodegenerative diseases

    Jorge J. Palop;Jeannie Chin;Lennart Mucke

  • Amyloid-β/Fyn–Induced Synaptic, Network, and Cognitive Impairments Depend on Tau Levels in Multiple Mouse Models of Alzheimer's Disease

    Erik D. Roberson;Brian Halabisky;Jong W. Yoo;Jinghua Yao

  • Levetiracetam suppresses neuronal network dysfunction and reverses synaptic and cognitive deficits in an Alzheimer’s disease model

    Pascal E. Sanchez;Lei Zhu;Laure Verret;Keith A. Vossel

  • Network abnormalities and interneuron dysfunction in Alzheimer’s disease: A multiscale perspective on abnormal neuronal activity in early AD

    Jorge J. Palop

  • Accelerating Amyloid-β Fibrillization Reduces Oligomer Levels and Functional Deficits in Alzheimer Disease Mouse Models *

    Irene H. Cheng;Kimberly Scearce-Levie;Kimberly Scearce-Levie;Justin Legleiter;Justin Legleiter;Jorge J. Palop;Jorge J. Palop

  • Neuronal depletion of calcium-dependent proteins in the dentate gyrus is tightly linked to Alzheimer's disease-related cognitive deficits

    Jorge J. Palop;Brian Jones;Lisa Kekonius;Jeannie Chin

  • Distinct roles of GABAergic interneurons in the regulation of striatal output pathways.

    Aryn H. Gittis;Alexandra B. Nelson;Myo T. Thwin;Jorge J. Palop

  • Phospholipase A2 reduction ameliorates cognitive deficits in a mouse model of Alzheimer's disease

    Rene O. Sanchez-Mejia;John W. Newman;Sandy Toh;Gui Qiu Yu

  • Fyn Kinase Induces Synaptic and Cognitive Impairments in a Transgenic Mouse Model of Alzheimer's Disease

    Jeannie Chin;Jorge J Palop;Jukka Puoliväli;Catherine Massaro

  • Transsynaptic Progression of Amyloid-β-Induced Neuronal Dysfunction within the Entorhinal-Hippocampal Network

    Julie A. Harris;Nino Devidze;Laure Verret;Kaitlyn Ho

  • Arc regulates spine morphology and maintains network stability in vivo

    Carol L. Peebles;Jong Yoo;Myo T. Thwin;Jorge J. Palop

  • What electrophysiology tells us about Alzheimer's disease: a window into the synchronization and connectivity of brain neurons.

    Claudio Babiloni;Katarzyna Blinowska;Laura Bonanni;Andrej Cichocki

  • Nav1.1-Overexpressing Interneuron Transplants Restore Brain Rhythms and Cognition in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer’s Disease

    Magdalena Martinez-Losa;Magdalena Martinez-Losa;Tara E. Tracy;Keran Ma;Laure Verret

  • Imbalance between GABAergic and Glutamatergic Transmission Impairs Adult Neurogenesis in an Animal Model of Alzheimer's Disease.

    Binggui Sun;Brian Halabisky;Yungui Zhou;Jorge J. Palop

  • Reelin depletion in the entorhinal cortex of human amyloid precursor protein transgenic mice and humans with Alzheimer's disease

    Jeannie Chin;Catherine M Massaro;Jorge J Palop;Myo T Thwin

Frequent Co-Authors

Lennart Mucke
Lennart Mucke University of California, San Francisco
Jeannie Chin
Jeannie Chin Baylor College of Medicine
Eliezer Masliah
Eliezer Masliah National Institutes of Health
Li Gan
Li Gan Cornell University
Eric Verdin
Eric Verdin Buck Institute for Research on Aging
Juan Nacher
Juan Nacher University of Valencia
Jae K. Ryu
Jae K. Ryu Gladstone Institutes
Katerina Akassoglou
Katerina Akassoglou University of California, San Francisco
Jeffrey L. Noebels
Jeffrey L. Noebels Baylor College of Medicine
Anatol C. Kreitzer
Anatol C. Kreitzer University of California, San Francisco

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As neuroscience continues to grow in demand, many students are exploring flexible options, such as accelerated programs online. These programs allow you to earn your degree faster, making it easier to enter the workforce or advance your education sooner.

When considering your academic journey, it’s also essential to think about your future earning potential. Neuroscience shares several overlapping skills with some of the highest paying majors. You may even find neuroscience combined with other fields featured among the easiest college majors with high pay, making it a versatile and financially rewarding choice.

Online education has become more accessible and affordable, with many of the best online colleges that accept fafsa offering neuroscience or related degrees. This means you can pursue your studies with financial aid support, broadening your options regardless of your budget.

Best Scientists Citing Jorge J. Palop

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles