World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 65 1686 1510 850 748 197 12429

John N. Reeve publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by John N. Reeve between 1970 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. John N. Reeve published across 53 years, from 1970 to 2022, averaging 4.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 1992. 1 of the 215 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1970 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 1992. 1970: 1 publication 1971: 2 publications 1972: 3 publications 1973: 3 publications 1974: 4 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 5 publications 1979: 3 publications 1980: 5 publications 1981: 6 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 8 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 6 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 9 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 10 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 7 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 5 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 3 publications 2014: 1 publication 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 1 publication
1970 2022

215 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
John N. Reeve: publications per year, 1970 to 2022
Year Publications
1970 1
1971 2
1972 3
1973 3
1974 4
1975 1
1976 0
1977 4
1978 5
1979 3
1980 5
1981 6
1982 2
1983 3
1984 3
1985 8
1986 6
1987 6
1988 4
1989 9
1990 6
1991 1
1992 10
1993 7
1994 5
1995 7
1996 6
1997 9
1998 5
1999 8
2000 9
2001 5
2002 4
2003 5
2004 3
2005 8
2006 2
2007 7
2008 6
2009 5
2010 4
2011 5
2012 1
2013 3
2014 1
2015 0
2016 0
2017 3
2018 0
2019 1
2020 0
2021 0
2022 1
Total 215
Download as CSV

John N. Reeve publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John N. Reeve sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 197–206 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 197 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100 197
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

John N. Reeve D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John N. Reeve sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 64–65 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131 65
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

John N. Reeve is affiliated with The Ohio State University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Medicine, Economics, Econometrics and Finance, with contributions also in Surgery, Economics and Econometrics, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their work addresses topics related to Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, and the broader impacts of Health and Medical Research.

One recent publication authored by Reeve is The time is now: Achieving FH paediatric screening across Europe - The Prague Declaration, published in 2022 through PubMed.

  • Nicole Bedlington
  • Marianne Abifadel
  • Birgit Beger
  • Mafalda Bourbon
  • Héctor Bueno

  • PubMed

John N. Reeve was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2009.

Best Publications

  • The Genome of M. Acetivorans Reveals Extensive Metabolic and Physiological Diversity

    James E. Galagan;Chad Nusbaum;Alice Roy;Matthew G. Endrizzi;Matthew G. Endrizzi;Matthew G. Endrizzi

  • Gene Structure, Organization, And Expression In Archaebacteria

    James W. Brown;Charles J. Daniels;John N. Reeve

  • Recovery and Identification of Viable Bacteria Immured in Glacial Ice

    Brent C. Christner;Ellen Mosley-Thompson;Lonnie G. Thompson;Victor Zagorodnov

  • Isolation of bacteria and 16S rDNAs from Lake Vostok accretion ice.

    Brent C. Christner;Ellen Mosley-Thompson;Lonnie G. Thompson;John N. Reeve

  • Molecular identification of bacteria and Eukarya inhabiting an Antarctic cryoconite hole.

    Brent C. Christner;Brent C. Christner;Brian H. Kvitko;John N. Reeve

  • HMf, a DNA-binding protein isolated from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Methanothermus fervidus, is most closely related to histones.

    K Sandman;J A Krzycki;B Dobrinski;R Lurz

  • Minicells of Bacillus subtilis

    John N. Reeve;Neil H. Mendelson;Sheila I. Coyne;Linda L. Hallock

  • Methanogenesis: genes, genomes, and who's on first?

    J N Reeve;J Nölling;R M Morgan;D R Smith

  • Archaeal nucleosomes

    Suzette L. Pereira;Rowan A. Grayling;Rudi Lurz;John N. Reeve

  • Bacterial recovery from ancient glacial ice.

    Brent C. Christner;Ellen Mosley-Thompson;Lonnie G. Thompson;John N. Reeve

  • Structure of histone-based chromatin in Archaea

    Francesca Mattiroli;Sudipta Bhattacharyya;Pamela N. Dyer;Alison E. White

  • Archaeal histones, nucleosomes, and transcription initiation.

    John N Reeve;Kathleen Sandman;Charles J Daniels

  • Archaeal chromatin and transcription

    John N. Reeve

  • Phylogenetic diversity and ecology of environmental Archaea.

    Charles E Robertson;J Kirk Harris;John R Spear;Norman R Pace

  • NMR structure of HMfB from the hyperthermophile, Methanothermus fervidus, confirms that this archaeal protein is a histone.

    Mary R. Starich;Kathleen Sandman;John N. Reeve;Michael F. Summers

  • Molecular biology of methanogens.

    John N. Reeve

  • Shuttle Vector Expression in Thermococcus kodakaraensis: Contributions of cis Elements to Protein Synthesis in a Hyperthermophilic Archaeon

    Thomas J Santangelo;L'ubomíra Cubonová;John N Reeve

  • Diversity of prokaryotic chromosomal proteins and the origin of the nucleosome

    K. Sandman;S. L. Pereira;J. N. Reeve

  • A hydrogenase-linked gene in Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum strain delta H encodes a polyferredoxin

    John N. Reeve;Gregory S. Beckler;David S. Cram;Paul T. Hamilton

  • DNA binding by the archaeal histone HMf results in positive supercoiling

    David R. Musgrave;Kathleen M. Sandman;John N. Reeve

Frequent Co-Authors

Ellen Mosley-Thompson
Ellen Mosley-Thompson The Ohio State University
Lonnie G. Thompson
Lonnie G. Thompson The Ohio State University
Michael Thomm
Michael Thomm University of Regensburg
Leo Meile
Leo Meile ETH Zurich
Haruyuki Atomi
Haruyuki Atomi Kyoto University
Giovanna Morelli
Giovanna Morelli Max Planck Society
Tadayuki Imanaka
Tadayuki Imanaka Ritsumeikan University
Michael F. Summers
Michael F. Summers University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Mark R. Chance
Mark R. Chance Case Western Reserve University
Alfred Pühler
Alfred Pühler Bielefeld University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring molecular biologists or those looking to advance in related health or science fields have a range of flexible, accredited options online. Choosing the right path often depends on personal goals, schedules, and professional requirements. For example, healthcare professionals comparing online RN to BSN programs can review detailed comparisons like capella vs chamberlain rn to bsn to make informed decisions between popular providers.

Those aiming for advanced nursing roles might consider a bsn to msn online bridge program, which can open doors to leadership or specialist positions in healthcare. Students seeking affordability and reputation can also explore the non profit online university options highlighted for their quality and cost-effectiveness.

Additionally, returning service members or active-duty military searching for academic flexibility will benefit from researching the best online colleges for military. By leveraging these resources and pathways, students with a background or interest in molecular biology can tailor their education to meet both immediate and long-term career objectives.

Best Scientists Citing John N. Reeve

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles