World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
65
Citations
12429
World Ranking
1686
National Ranking
851

John N. Reeve publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John N. Reeve sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 197 publications — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

John N. Reeve D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John N. Reeve sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 65 D-Index — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2009 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

John N. Reeve is affiliated with The Ohio State University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Medicine, Economics, Econometrics and Finance, with contributions also in Surgery, Economics and Econometrics, and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health.

Their work addresses topics related to Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health, Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life, and the broader impacts of Health and Medical Research.

One recent publication authored by Reeve is The time is now: Achieving FH paediatric screening across Europe - The Prague Declaration, published in 2022 through PubMed.

  • Nicole Bedlington
  • Marianne Abifadel
  • Birgit Beger
  • Mafalda Bourbon
  • Héctor Bueno

  • PubMed

John N. Reeve was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2009.

Best Publications

  • The Genome of M. Acetivorans Reveals Extensive Metabolic and Physiological Diversity

    James E. Galagan;Chad Nusbaum;Alice Roy;Matthew G. Endrizzi;Matthew G. Endrizzi;Matthew G. Endrizzi

  • Gene Structure, Organization, And Expression In Archaebacteria

    James W. Brown;Charles J. Daniels;John N. Reeve

  • Recovery and Identification of Viable Bacteria Immured in Glacial Ice

    Brent C. Christner;Ellen Mosley-Thompson;Lonnie G. Thompson;Victor Zagorodnov

  • Isolation of bacteria and 16S rDNAs from Lake Vostok accretion ice.

    Brent C. Christner;Ellen Mosley-Thompson;Lonnie G. Thompson;John N. Reeve

  • Molecular identification of bacteria and Eukarya inhabiting an Antarctic cryoconite hole.

    Brent C. Christner;Brent C. Christner;Brian H. Kvitko;John N. Reeve

  • HMf, a DNA-binding protein isolated from the hyperthermophilic archaeon Methanothermus fervidus, is most closely related to histones.

    K Sandman;J A Krzycki;B Dobrinski;R Lurz

  • Minicells of Bacillus subtilis

    John N. Reeve;Neil H. Mendelson;Sheila I. Coyne;Linda L. Hallock

  • Methanogenesis: genes, genomes, and who's on first?

    J N Reeve;J Nölling;R M Morgan;D R Smith

  • Archaeal nucleosomes

    Suzette L. Pereira;Rowan A. Grayling;Rudi Lurz;John N. Reeve

  • Bacterial recovery from ancient glacial ice.

    Brent C. Christner;Ellen Mosley-Thompson;Lonnie G. Thompson;John N. Reeve

  • Structure of histone-based chromatin in Archaea

    Francesca Mattiroli;Sudipta Bhattacharyya;Pamela N. Dyer;Alison E. White

  • Archaeal histones, nucleosomes, and transcription initiation.

    John N Reeve;Kathleen Sandman;Charles J Daniels

  • Archaeal chromatin and transcription

    John N. Reeve

  • Phylogenetic diversity and ecology of environmental Archaea.

    Charles E Robertson;J Kirk Harris;John R Spear;Norman R Pace

  • NMR structure of HMfB from the hyperthermophile, Methanothermus fervidus, confirms that this archaeal protein is a histone.

    Mary R. Starich;Kathleen Sandman;John N. Reeve;Michael F. Summers

  • Molecular biology of methanogens.

    John N. Reeve

  • Shuttle Vector Expression in Thermococcus kodakaraensis: Contributions of cis Elements to Protein Synthesis in a Hyperthermophilic Archaeon

    Thomas J Santangelo;L'ubomíra Cubonová;John N Reeve

  • Diversity of prokaryotic chromosomal proteins and the origin of the nucleosome

    K. Sandman;S. L. Pereira;J. N. Reeve

  • A hydrogenase-linked gene in Methanobacterium thermoautotrophicum strain delta H encodes a polyferredoxin

    John N. Reeve;Gregory S. Beckler;David S. Cram;Paul T. Hamilton

  • DNA binding by the archaeal histone HMf results in positive supercoiling

    David R. Musgrave;Kathleen M. Sandman;John N. Reeve

Frequent Co-Authors

Ellen Mosley-Thompson
Ellen Mosley-Thompson The Ohio State University
Lonnie G. Thompson
Lonnie G. Thompson The Ohio State University
Michael Thomm
Michael Thomm University of Regensburg
Leo Meile
Leo Meile ETH Zurich
Haruyuki Atomi
Haruyuki Atomi Kyoto University
Giovanna Morelli
Giovanna Morelli Max Planck Society
Tadayuki Imanaka
Tadayuki Imanaka Ritsumeikan University
Michael F. Summers
Michael F. Summers University of Maryland, Baltimore County
Mark R. Chance
Mark R. Chance Case Western Reserve University
Alfred Pühler
Alfred Pühler Bielefeld University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring molecular biologists or those looking to advance in related health or science fields have a range of flexible, accredited options online. Choosing the right path often depends on personal goals, schedules, and professional requirements. For example, healthcare professionals comparing online RN to BSN programs can review detailed comparisons like capella vs chamberlain rn to bsn to make informed decisions between popular providers.

Those aiming for advanced nursing roles might consider a bsn to msn online bridge program, which can open doors to leadership or specialist positions in healthcare. Students seeking affordability and reputation can also explore the non profit online university options highlighted for their quality and cost-effectiveness.

Additionally, returning service members or active-duty military searching for academic flexibility will benefit from researching the best online colleges for military. By leveraging these resources and pathways, students with a background or interest in molecular biology can tailor their education to meet both immediate and long-term career objectives.

Best Scientists Citing John N. Reeve

Trending Scientists