World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
73
Citations
22073
World Ranking
1267
National Ranking
97

John K. Heath publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John K. Heath sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 171 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

John K. Heath D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John K. Heath sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

John K. Heath is affiliated with the University of Birmingham in the United Kingdom. Their research spans multiple areas within the broader fields of biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, and psychology. The focus of their work includes advanced proteomics techniques, mass spectrometry applications, mechanisms of RNA and protein synthesis, as well as cancer research and pluripotent stem cell studies.

Heath's scholarly output includes four recent papers published between 2020 and 2022. These papers cover a range of scientific topics and have appeared in different journals:

  • "FAIMS Enhances the Detection of PTM Crosstalk Sites" (2022), Journal of Proteome Research
  • "Differential responses to kinase inhibition in FGFR2-addicted triple negative breast cancer cells: a quantitative phosphoproteomics study" (2020), Scientific Reports
  • "Combined transcriptomic and phosphoproteomic analysis of BMP4 signaling in human embryonic stem cells" (2020), Stem Cell Research
  • "The Impact of a Model of Nonmaterial Consciousness on the Concept of Mind in Action" (2022), Transactional Analysis Journal

Frequent co-authors in Heath's publications include:

  • Debbie L. Cunningham
  • Kish R. Adoni
  • Aneika C. Leney
  • Adil R. Sarhan
  • Andrew J. Creese

Their studies have been published in venues such as:

  • Journal of Proteome Research
  • Scientific Reports
  • Stem Cell Research
  • Transactional Analysis Journal

The main fields of study for Heath's work are:

  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
  • Psychology

Within these fields, subfields addressed include:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Clinical Psychology
  • Spectroscopy
  • Cancer Research
  • Cell Biology

The primary research topics they have engaged with encompass:

  • Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
  • Mass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Fibroblast Growth Factor Research
  • Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
  • Hippo pathway signaling and YAP/TAZ
  • Pluripotent Stem Cells Research

Best Publications

  • Inhibition of pluripotential embryonic stem cell differentiation by purified polypeptides

    Austin G. Smith;John K. Heath;Deborah D. Donaldson;Gordon G. Wong

  • Transforming growth factor beta modulates the expression of collagenase and metalloproteinase inhibitor.

    D. R. Edwards;G. Murphy;J. J. Reynolds;S. E. Whitham

  • Aggressiveness, hypoalgesia and high blood pressure in mice lacking the adenosine A2a receptor.

    Catherine Ledent;Jean-Marie Vaugeois;Serge N. Schiffmann;Thierry Pedrazzini

  • Mesoderm induction in early Xenopus embryos by heparin-binding growth factors.

    J. M. W. Slack;B. G. Darlington;J. K. Heath;S. F. Godsave

  • PDGF-A signaling is a critical event in lung alveolar myofibroblast development and alveogenesis

    Hans Boström;Karen Willetts;Karen Willetts;Milos Pekny;Per Levéen

  • Targeted disruption of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) receptor 2 suggests a role for FGF signaling in pregastrulation mammalian development.

    Esther Arman;Rebecca Haffner-Krausz;Yali Chen;John K. Heath

  • Fibroblast growth factors induce additional limb development from the flank of chick embryos

    Martin J Cohn;Juan Carlos Izpisúa-Belmonte;Helen Abud;John K Heath;John K Heath

  • Developmental expression of 2ar (osteopontin) and SPARC (osteonectin) RNA as revealed by in situ hybridization

    S Nomura;AJ Wills;Edwards;JK Heath

  • Oligodendrocyte Population Dynamics and the Role of PDGF In Vivo

    Andrew R Calver;Anita C Hall;Wei-Ping Yu;Frank S Walsh

  • Defective oligodendrocyte development and severe hypomyelination in PDGF-A knockout mice

    Marcus Fruttiger;Linda Karlsson;Anita C. Hall;Alexandra Abramsson

  • Cardiotrophin-1 Activates a Distinct Form of Cardiac Muscle Cell Hypertrophy ASSEMBLY OF SARCOMERIC UNITS IN SERIES VIA gp130/LEUKEMIA INHIBITORY FACTOR RECEPTOR-DEPENDENT PATHWAYS

    Kai C. Wollert;Tetsuya Taga;Mikiyoshi Saito;Masashi Narazaki

  • Alveogenesis failure in PDGF-A-deficient mice is coupled to lack of distal spreading of alveolar smooth muscle cell progenitors during lung development

    Per Lindahl;Linda Karlsson;Mats Hellström;Samuel Gebre-Medhin

  • Differentiation inhibiting activity is produced in matrix-associated and diffusible forms that are generated by alternate promoter usage.

    Peter D. Rathjen;Sara Toth;Anthony Willis;John K. Heath

  • Functions of fibroblast growth factors and their receptors

    Andrew O.M. Wilkie;Gillian M. Morriss-Kay;E. Yvonne Jones;John K. Heath

  • Receptor recognition by gp130 cytokines

    Jerónimo Bravo;John K. Heath

  • The crystal structure and biological function of leukemia inhibitory factor: Implications for receptor binding

    R C Robinson;L M Grey;D Staunton;Hugo Vankelecom

  • Apert Syndrome Mutations in Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor 2 Exhibit increased Affinity for FGF Ligand

    Jane Anderson;Helen D. Burns;Pita Enriquez-Harris;Andrew O. M. Wilkie

  • Hyaluronidase Induction of a WW Domain-containing Oxidoreductase That Enhances Tumor Necrosis Factor Cytotoxicity

    Nan Shan Chang;Nicole Pratt;John Heath;Lori Schultz

  • Fgfr2 and osteopontin domains in the developing skull vault are mutually exclusive and can be altered by locally applied FGF2

    S. Iseki;A. O. M. Wilkie;J. K. Heath;T. Ishimaru

  • Probabilistic model checking of complex biological pathways

    John Heath;Marta Kwiatkowska;Gethin Norman;David Parker

Frequent Co-Authors

Austin Smith
Austin Smith University of Exeter
Dylan R. Edwards
Dylan R. Edwards University of East Anglia
Andrew O.M. Wilkie
Andrew O.M. Wilkie University of Oxford
Brigid L.M. Hogan
Brigid L.M. Hogan Duke University
E Y Jones
E Y Jones University of Oxford
Clare M. Isacke
Clare M. Isacke Institute of Cancer Research
Christer Betsholtz
Christer Betsholtz Uppsala University
David H. Barlow
David H. Barlow Boston University
Stephen R.F. Twigg
Stephen R.F. Twigg University of Oxford
Xin Yao
Xin Yao Lingnan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology can open doors to a wide range of careers in healthcare, education, research, and biotechnology. Many students choose flexible learning options to advance their qualifications. For example, those with a nursing background may consider the cheapest bsn to msn online programs to bridge into higher-level nursing or research roles.

If you value affordability and credibility, enrolling in non profit colleges can provide strong academic foundations while minimizing student debt.

For military personnel and veterans, there are many online colleges for military that offer flexible schedules, military tuition benefits, and dedicated support services.

Molecular Biology skills also benefit those interested in the broader healthcare and social science sectors. Programs such as the best online msw programs can prepare graduates for impactful roles in social work, policy, or healthcare administration—offering further pathways to shape the future of science and society.

Best Scientists Citing John K. Heath

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles