World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 92 11317 10638 1072 1024 351 30603
Genetics 92 1004 950 142 136 325 30209

Andrew O.M. Wilkie publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Andrew O.M. Wilkie between 1988 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Andrew O.M. Wilkie published across 38 years, from 1988 to 2025, averaging 10.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 1993. 18 of the 382 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 1993. 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 5 publications 1992: 16 publications 1993: 21 publications 1994: 11 publications 1995: 12 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 10 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 11 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 12 publications 2004: 9 publications 2005: 12 publications 2006: 12 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 9 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 7 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 8 publications
1988 2025

382 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Andrew O.M. Wilkie: publications per year, 1988 to 2025
Year Publications
1988 2
1989 2
1990 6
1991 5
1992 16
1993 21
1994 11
1995 12
1996 9
1997 10
1998 7
1999 4
2000 12
2001 11
2002 7
2003 12
2004 9
2005 12
2006 12
2007 13
2008 7
2009 12
2010 10
2011 10
2012 12
2013 14
2014 12
2015 6
2016 10
2017 9
2018 10
2019 13
2020 12
2021 16
2022 11
2023 7
2024 10
2025 8
Total 382
Download as CSV

Andrew O.M. Wilkie publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew O.M. Wilkie sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 325–334 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 325 publications — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60 325
335–344 52
345–354 40
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Andrew O.M. Wilkie D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Andrew O.M. Wilkie sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72 92
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2013 - Fellow of the Royal Society, United Kingdom

Overview

Andrew O.M. Wilkie is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily centers around biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology, with a significant focus on genetics and molecular biology subfields. Wilkie's scholarly output encompasses various topics including craniofacial disorders and treatments, cleft lip and palate research, genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities, genomics and rare diseases, connective tissue disorders research, genetics and neurodevelopmental disorders, and studies related to the Hedgehog signaling pathway.

The scientist has contributed extensively to academic literature with notable recent papers such as:

  • "Mendelian inheritance revisited: dominance and recessiveness in medical genetics" (2023), published in Nature Reviews Genetics
  • "The developing mouse coronal suture at single-cell resolution" (2021), published in Nature Communications
  • "TAOK1 is associated with neurodevelopmental disorder and essential for neuronal maturation and cortical development" (2021), published in Human Mutation
  • "Structural and non-coding variants increase the diagnostic yield of clinical whole genome sequencing for rare diseases" (2023), published in Genome Medicine
  • "Population screening requires robust evidence-genomics is no exception" (2023), published in The Lancet

Wilkie frequently collaborates with other researchers. Some of the most common co-authors include Stephen R.F. Twigg, Eduardo Calpena, Steven A. Wall, Louise C. Wilson, and David Johnson, indicating active participation in collaborative research projects.

The scientist's work has been published across a variety of specialized venues. The most frequent publication outlets include:

  • Journal of Medical Genetics
  • Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
  • Genetics in Medicine
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Human Mutation

In recognition of their contributions to science, Andrew O.M. Wilkie was awarded Fellowship of the Royal Society, United Kingdom, in 2013.

Best Publications

  • Integrating mapping-, assembly- and haplotype-based approaches for calling variants in clinical sequencing applications

    A Rimmer;H Phan;I Mathieson;Z Iqbal

  • Apert syndrome results from localized mutations of FGFR2 and is allelic with Crouzon syndrome.

    Andrew O.M. Wilkie;Andrew O.M. Wilkie;Sarah F. Slaney;Sarah F. Slaney;Michael Oldridge;Michael D. Poole

  • The Human Phenotype Ontology project: linking molecular biology and disease through phenotype data

    Sebastian Köhler;Sandra C. Doelken;Christopher J. Mungall;Sebastian Bauer

  • A review of the molecular genetics of the human alpha-globin gene cluster.

    Higgs;M A Vickers;A O Wilkie;I M Pretorius

  • Craniosynostosis: Genes and Mechanisms

    Andrew O. M. Wilkie

  • The detection of subtelomeric chromosomal rearrangements in idiopathic mental retardation.

    Jonathan Flint;Andrew O.M. Wilkie;Veronica J. Buckle;Robin M. Winter

  • Identical mutations in the FGFR2 gene cause both Pfeiffer and Crouzon syndrome phenotypes.

    P Rutland;L J Pulleyn;W Reardon;M Baraitser

  • Genetics of craniofacial development and malformation

    Andrew O. M. Wilkie;Gillian M. Morriss-Kay

  • Growth of the normal skull vault and its alteration in craniosynostosis: insights from human genetics and experimental studies

    Gillian M. Morriss-Kay;Andrew O. M. Wilkie

  • A unique point mutation in the fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 gene (FGFR3) defines a new craniosynostosis syndrome.

    M Muenke;K W Gripp;D M McDonald-McGinn;K Gaudenz

  • Localized mutations in the gene encoding the cytoskeletal protein filamin A cause diverse malformations in humans.

    Stephen P. Robertson;Stephen P. Robertson;Stephen R.F. Twigg;Andrew J. Sutherland-Smith;Valérie Biancalana

  • Factors influencing success of clinical genome sequencing across a broad spectrum of disorders

    Jenny C. Taylor;Jenny C. Taylor;Hilary C. Martin;Stefano Lise;John Broxholme

  • Paternal Age Effect Mutations and Selfish Spermatogonial Selection: Causes and Consequences for Human Disease

    Anne Goriely;Andrew O.M. Wilkie

  • Mutations of ephrin-B1 (EFNB1), a marker of tissue boundary formation, cause craniofrontonasal syndrome.

    Stephen R. F. Twigg;Rui Kan;Christian Babbs;Elena G. Bochukova

  • The molecular basis of genetic dominance.

    A. O. M. Wilkie

  • Exclusive paternal origin of new mutations in Apert syndrome

    Dominique M. Moloney;Sarah R Slaney;Michael Oldridge;Steven A. Wall

  • Fgfr1 and Fgfr2 have distinct differentiation- and proliferation-related roles in the developing mouse skull vault

    S. Iseki;A.O. Wilkie;G.M. Morriss-Kay

  • Recessive Robinow syndrome, allelic to dominant brachydactyly type B, is caused by mutation of ROR2

    Ali R. Afzal;Anna Rajab;Christiane D. Fenske;Michael Oldridge

  • OPD-spectrum Disorders Clinical Collaborative Group. Localized mutations in the gene encoding the cytoskeletal protein filamin A cause diverse malformations in humans

    SP Robertson;Twigg;AJ Sutherland-Smith;Biancalana

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen R.F. Twigg
Stephen R.F. Twigg University of Oxford
Simon J. McGowan
Simon J. McGowan University of Oxford
Douglas R. Higgs
Douglas R. Higgs University of Oxford
Stephen P. Robertson
Stephen P. Robertson University of Otago
Veronica J. Buckle
Veronica J. Buckle University of Oxford
Jenny C. Taylor
Jenny C. Taylor University of Oxford
Jill Clayton-Smith
Jill Clayton-Smith University of Manchester
Peter J. van der Spek
Peter J. van der Spek Erasmus University Rotterdam
Han G. Brunner
Han G. Brunner Radboud University
David J. Weatherall
David J. Weatherall University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Genetics in the USA can lead to a variety of career pathways, including healthcare, research, laboratory technology, and data analysis. Students interested in supporting roles or wanting to work within the healthcare industry may look into specialized administrative programs, such as those offered by the best online medical billing and coding schools.

For those eager to accelerate their education, there are fast track college programs available, enabling students to complete their degrees more quickly and enter the workforce sooner. Flexibility is also crucial; many learners benefit from the ability to control the pace of their studies. Institutions offering self paced degrees allow you to advance through coursework at your own speed.

Additionally, prospective genetics students may find it advantageous to apply to an online college no application fee to minimize upfront costs. Online education in genetics and related fields provides numerous opportunities for students with different interests, timelines, and financial needs.

Best Scientists Citing Andrew O.M. Wilkie

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles