World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 33 3081 2897 1048 930 182 3472

Anastasia Muliana publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anastasia Muliana between 2002 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anastasia Muliana published across 25 years, from 2002 to 2026, averaging 7.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2015. 6 of the 192 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2002 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2015. 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 5 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 8 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 11 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 5 publications 2026: 1 publication
2002 2026

192 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anastasia Muliana: publications per year, 2002 to 2026
Year Publications
2002 1
2003 1
2004 5
2005 2
2006 6
2007 6
2008 7
2009 10
2010 8
2011 11
2012 11
2013 9
2014 11
2015 14
2016 10
2017 12
2018 13
2019 8
2020 7
2021 8
2022 13
2023 9
2024 4
2025 5
2026 1
Total 192
Download as CSV

Anastasia Muliana publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anastasia Muliana sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 177–186 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 182 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130 182
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Anastasia Muliana D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anastasia Muliana sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153 33
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers

Overview

Anastasia Muliana is affiliated with Texas A&M University in the United States and has an extensive research record in engineering with a focus on mechanical and materials engineering. The scientist has contributed significantly to the understanding of the mechanical behavior of composites and polymers, with research spanning topics such as bioenergy crops, cellular structures, and additive manufacturing technologies.

Their recent publications cover a range of topics relevant to materials science and engineering. Notable papers include:

  • Tuning mechanical properties of 3D printed composites with PLA:TPU programmable filaments (2023), published in Composite Structures
  • Mechanics of kerf patterns for creating freeform structures (2020), published in Acta Mechanica
  • Modeling temporal and spatial changes during hydrolytic degradation and erosion in biodegradable polymers (2020), published in Polymer Degradation and Stability
  • Time-dependent mechanical behavior of sweet sorghum stems (2020), published in Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials
  • Spatial and temporal changes in physical properties of epoxy during curing and their effects on the residual stresses and properties of cured epoxy and composites (2021), published in Applications in Engineering Science

The scientist's body of work is prominently published in several key venues, including:

  • Composite Structures
  • Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials
  • International Journal of Solids and Structures
  • Acta Mechanica
  • Polymer Degradation and Stability

Major fields and subfields of study for Anastasia Muliana include:

  • Engineering
  • Mechanical Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Polymers and Plastics
  • Civil and Structural Engineering

Research topics extensively explored cover the following areas:

  • Tree Root and Stability Studies
  • Mechanical Behavior of Composites
  • Bioenergy Crop Production and Management
  • Cellular and Composite Structures
  • Advanced Materials and Mechanics
  • Polymer Composites and Self-Healing
  • Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies

The scientist has collaborated frequently with other researchers, including:

  • Negar Kalantar
  • Zaryab Shahid
  • Matt Pharr
  • Qing Li
  • Scott A. Finlayson

Recognition includes being named a Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers in 2016.

Best Publications

  • Numerical finite element formulation of the Schapery non-linear viscoelastic material model

    Rami M. Haj-Ali;Anastasia H. Muliana

  • Nonlinear viscoelastic analysis of unaged and aged asphalt binders

    Eyad Masad;Chien-Wei Huang;Gordon Airey;Anastasia Muliana

  • A multi-scale constitutive formulation for the nonlinear viscoelastic analysis of laminated composite materials and structures

    Rami M. Haj-Ali;Anastasia H. Muliana

  • Mechanical responses of Ecoflex silicone rubber: Compressible and incompressible behaviors

    D. Steck;J. Qu;S. B. Kordmahale;D. Tscharnuter

  • Thermal and mechanical properties of Al/Al2O3 composites at elevated temperatures

    Pradeep Gudlur;Adam Forness;Jonathan Lentz;Miladin Radovic

  • Modeling the response of nonlinear viscoelastic biodegradable polymeric stents

    Anastasia Muliana;K.R. Rajagopal

  • Nonlinearly viscoelastic analysis of asphalt mixes subjected to shear loading

    Chien-Wei Huang;Eyad Masad;Anastasia H. Muliana;Hussain Bahia

  • Artificial Neural Network and Finite Element Modeling of Nanoindentation Tests

    Anastasia Muliana;Rami M. Haj-Ali;Rejanah Steward;Ashok Saxena

  • A micromechanical constitutive framework for the nonlinear viscoelastic behavior of pultruded composite materials

    Rami M. Haj-Ali;Anastasia H. Muliana

  • A thermo-mechanical viscoelastic analysis of orthotropic materials

    Sourabh Sawant;Anastasia Muliana

  • A concurrent micromechanical model for predicting nonlinear viscoelastic responses of composites reinforced with solid spherical particles

    Anastasia H. Muliana;Jeong Sik Kim

  • A micromechanical formulation for piezoelectric fiber composites with nonlinear and viscoelastic constituents

    Anastasia H. Muliana

  • A time‐integration method for the viscoelastic–viscoplastic analyses of polymers and finite element implementation

    Jeong Sik Kim;Anastasia H. Muliana

  • A new class of quasi-linear models for describing the nonlinear viscoelastic response of materials

    A. Muliana;K. R. Rajagopal;A. S. Wineman

  • Thermal properties of BaTiO3/Ag composites at different temperatures

    Junwei Xing;Miladin Radovic;Anastasia Muliana

  • Characterization of thermo-mechanical and long-term behaviors of multi-layered composite materials

    Anastasia Muliana;Aravind Nair;Kamran A. Khan;Shannon Wagner

  • A multi-scale model for coupled heat conduction and deformations of viscoelastic functionally graded materials

    Kamran A. Khan;Anastasia H. Muliana

  • Micromechanics models for the effective nonlinear electro-mechanical responses of piezoelectric composites

    Chien Hong Lin;Anastasia Muliana

  • Mechanical reinforcement of epoxy with self-Assembled synthetic clay in smectic order

    Peng Li;Kevin L. White;Chien Hong Lin;Daehak Kim

  • Thermal stress and deformation analyses in fiber reinforced polymer composites undergoing heat conduction and mechanical loading

    Jaehyeuk Jeon;Anastasia Muliana;Valeria La Saponara

  • Time dependent behavior of ferroelectric materials undergoing changes in their material properties with electric field and temperature

    Anastasia Muliana

  • A time-integration algorithm for thermo-rheologically complex polymers

    Anastasia Muliana;Kamran A. Khan

  • A micromechanical model for predicting thermal properties and thermo-viscoelastic responses of functionally graded materials

    Anastasia H. Muliana

  • Responses of viscoelastic polymer composites with temperature and time dependent constituents

    Anastasia H. Muliana;Sourabh Sawant

Frequent Co-Authors

Kumbakonam R. Rajagopal
Kumbakonam R. Rajagopal Texas A&M University
Rami Haj-Ali
Rami Haj-Ali Tel Aviv University
Kamran A. Khan
Kamran A. Khan Khalifa University
Miladin Radovic
Miladin Radovic Texas A&M University
William L. Rooney
William L. Rooney Texas A&M University
Eyad Masad
Eyad Masad Hamad bin Khalifa University
Anthony N. Palazotto
Anthony N. Palazotto Air Force Institute of Technology
Martin Lévesque
Martin Lévesque Polytechnique Montréal
Alan S. Wineman
Alan S. Wineman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Karl J. Niklas
Karl J. Niklas Cornell University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in expanding their expertise beyond Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, several online degree programs offer flexible and accelerated options. For example, those looking to enter human-centered fields might consider an accelerated applied behavior analysis masters online, which provides an opportunity to quickly gain specialized skills with a focus on behavioral science.

Healthcare and therapy sectors are also popular alternatives. Understanding the challenges of program admissions is vital. Websites detailing speech pathology grad school acceptance rates can help prospective students realistically assess their chances and prepare accordingly.

For those interested in audiology, researching the easiest audiology programs to get into can provide a strategic approach to enrollment, balancing fit and accessibility. Additionally, understanding financial commitments is crucial; insights into the cost of online speech pathology degree programs help students budget effectively.

These pathways demonstrate the growing diversity of career options linked to engineering foundations, highlighting how interdisciplinary knowledge can open doors to innovative and fulfilling professions.

Best Scientists Citing Anastasia Muliana

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles