World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 60 3062 2802 1209 1074 148 34819

Janice S. Blum publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Janice S. Blum between 1980 and 2022, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Janice S. Blum published across 43 years, from 1980 to 2022, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2016. 3 of the 154 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2022. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2016. 1980: 1 publication 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 1 publication 1984: 2 publications 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 6 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 3 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 6 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 3 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 8 publications 2015: 9 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 3 publications 2019: 3 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 2 publications 2022: 1 publication
1980 2022

154 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Janice S. Blum: publications per year, 1980 to 2022
Year Publications
1980 1
1981 0
1982 0
1983 1
1984 2
1985 1
1986 0
1987 1
1988 2
1989 3
1990 6
1991 4
1992 0
1993 3
1994 3
1995 0
1996 4
1997 4
1998 4
1999 1
2000 6
2001 2
2002 4
2003 4
2004 5
2005 9
2006 3
2007 5
2008 6
2009 7
2010 5
2011 4
2012 7
2013 9
2014 8
2015 9
2016 10
2017 1
2018 3
2019 3
2020 1
2021 2
2022 1
Total 154
Download as CSV

Janice S. Blum publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janice S. Blum sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 145–154 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 148 publications — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265 148
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Janice S. Blum D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janice S. Blum sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139 60
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Janice S. Blum is affiliated with Indiana University in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on areas within medicine, immunology and microbiology, and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Specific subfields of study connected to their work include immunology, hematology, molecular biology, genetics, and surgery.

The researcher's academic contributions explore topics such as immunotherapy and immune responses, vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches, T-cell and B-cell immunology, diabetes and associated disorders, pancreatic function and diabetes, diabetes management and research, and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

Their record of publications includes works in several notable journals:

  • GILT Expression in Human Melanoma Cells Enhances Generation of Antigenic Peptides for HLA Class II-Mediated Immune Recognition (2022) in International Journal of Molecular Sciences
  • The Effect of Ethnicity in the Rate of Beta-Cell Functional Loss in the First 3 Years After Type 1 Diabetes Diagnosis (2020) in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
  • Expression of gilt acts as a positive regulator of mouse hematopoietic progenitor cells (2021) in Blood Cells Molecules and Diseases

Frequent collaborators identified in their research include:

  • Jay M. Sosenko
  • Carla J. Greenbaum
  • Jeffrey P. Krischer
  • Jay S. Skyler
  • María J. Redondo

The venues where Janice S. Blum has published multiple times include the International Journal of Molecular Sciences, The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, and Blood Cells Molecules and Diseases.

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Amal Kamal Abdel-Aziz;Sara Abdelfatah;Mahmoud Abdellatif

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Fabio C. Abdalla;Hagai Abeliovich;Robert T. Abraham

  • Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy in higher eukaryotes

    Daniel J. Klionsky;Hagai Abeliovich;Patrizia Agostinis;Devendra K. Agrawal

  • Pathways of Antigen Processing

    Janice S. Blum;Pamela A. Wearsch;Peter Cresswell

  • Inactivation of glutathione peroxidase by superoxide radical.

    Janice Blum;Irwin Fridovich

  • Immunogenicity of Therapeutic Protein Aggregates

    Ehab M. Moussa;Jainik P. Panchal;Balakrishnan S. Moorthy;Janice S. Blum

  • Role for intracellular proteases in the processing and transport of class II HLA antigens

    J S Blum;P Cresswell

  • Co-localization of molecules involved in antigen processing and presentation in an early endocytic compartment.

    Lynne E. Guagliardi;Bruce Koppelman;Janice S. Blum;Michael S. Marks

  • Lamp-2a Facilitates MHC Class II Presentation of Cytoplasmic Antigens

    Delu Zhou;Ping Li;Yinling Lin;Jeremy M. Lott

  • Editing of the HLA-DR-peptide repertoire by HLA-DM.

    Harald Kropshofer;Anne B. Vogt;Gerhard Moldenhauer;Juergen Hammer

  • Autophagy and Its Role in MHC-Mediated Antigen Presentation

    Victoria L. Crotzer;Janice S. Blum

  • CD4-Independent Infection of Astrocytes by Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1: Requirement for the Human Mannose Receptor

    Ying Liu;Hao Liu;Hao Liu;Byung Oh Kim;Vincent H. Gattone

  • Intestinal epithelial cells use two distinct pathways for HLA class II antigen processing.

    Robert M. Hershberg;Paul E. Framson;Diane H. Cho;Lawrence Y. Lee

  • Endosomal aspartic proteinases are required for invariant-chain processing

    Maja A. Marić;Michael D. Taylor;Janice S. Blum;Janice S. Blum

  • Anti-type V collagen lymphocytes that express IL-17 and IL-23 induce rejection pathology in fresh and well-healed lung transplants.

    S. Yoshida;A. Haque;T. Mizobuchi;T. Iwata

  • Evidence for immune responses to a self-antigen in lung transplantation: Role of type V collagen-specific T cells in the pathogenesis of lung allograft rejection

    M. Azizul Haque;Teruaki Mizobuchi;Kazuhiro Yasufuku;Takehiko Fujisawa

  • Autophagy and adaptive immunity

    Victoria L. Crotzer;Janice S. Blum

  • The E5 protein of human papillomavirus type 16 perturbs MHC class II antigen maturation in human foreskin keratinocytes treated with interferon-γ

    Benyue Zhang;Ping Li;Exing Wang;Zacharie Brahmi

  • Invariant chain trimers are sequestered in the rough endoplasmic reticulum in the absence of association with HLA class II antigens.

    Michael S. Marks;Janice S. Blum;Peter Cresswell

  • CIITA-regulated plexin-A1 affects T-cell-dendritic cell interactions.

    Athena W. Wong;W. June Brickey;Debra J. Taxman;Hendrick W. van Deventer

Frequent Co-Authors

Linda A. DiMeglio
Linda A. DiMeglio Indiana University
Randy R. Brutkiewicz
Randy R. Brutkiewicz Indiana University
Mark H. Kaplan
Mark H. Kaplan Indiana University
Philip D. Stahl
Philip D. Stahl Washington University in St. Louis
Peter Cresswell
Peter Cresswell Yale University
Michael S. Marks
Michael S. Marks Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Carla J. Greenbaum
Carla J. Greenbaum Virginia Mason Medical Center
Eeva-Liisa Eskelinen
Eeva-Liisa Eskelinen University of Turku
Irwin Fridovich
Irwin Fridovich Duke University
Andrea Ballabio
Andrea Ballabio Baylor College of Medicine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring microbiology as a field opens the door to numerous related online degrees and career options. For those interested in the healthcare sector, pursuing fastest online medical billing and coding certificate programs can be a practical stepping stone. These programs often require less time and offer quick certification, making them ideal for entry-level roles in healthcare administration.

Students aiming for clinical roles may also consider various online medical degrees. These degrees provide flexibility for learners who need to balance study with other commitments while opening pathways into healthcare, research, and allied fields.

For those interested in public health, many mph online programs with easy admission requirements offer accessible entry points. These programs focus on population health and preventive medicine, complementing a background in microbiology with broader health policy and management skills.

On the career front, individuals with microbiology expertise can explore specialized roles such as becoming a child life specialist. Insights into this pathway, along with information about child life specialist salary, can help in understanding the financial and professional expectations of this rewarding healthcare role.

Best Scientists Citing Janice S. Blum

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles