World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Janet A. Warrington

Janet A. Warrington

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 48 2654 2403 1292 1159 79 21945

Janet A. Warrington publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Janet A. Warrington between 1991 and 2017, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Janet A. Warrington published across 27 years, from 1991 to 2017, averaging 3.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2003. 1 of the 95 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2017. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2003. 1991: 3 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 8 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 7 publications 2003: 14 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 3 publications 2009: 0 publications 2010: 0 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 1 publication 2014: 0 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 1 publication
1991 2017

95 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Janet A. Warrington: publications per year, 1991 to 2017
Year Publications
1991 3
1992 3
1993 2
1994 4
1995 0
1996 5
1997 0
1998 4
1999 7
2000 8
2001 8
2002 7
2003 14
2004 5
2005 8
2006 8
2007 1
2008 3
2009 0
2010 0
2011 0
2012 1
2013 1
2014 0
2015 2
2016 0
2017 1
Total 95
Download as CSV

Janet A. Warrington publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet A. Warrington sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 77–86 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 79 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90 79
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Janet A. Warrington D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Janet A. Warrington sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48–49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118 48
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Janet A. Warrington is affiliated with Cybele Microbiome in the United States. Their work relates to research conducted within this institution, contributing to the scientific community in the field of microbiome studies.

There is no publicly listed information regarding specific recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues associated with Janet A. Warrington. Similarly, data on book publications, main fields of study, subfields, main research topics, or awards have not been documented.

Due to the absence of detailed publication records or documented contributions, a precise outline of the research focus or thematic areas of interest is not available. The profile is therefore limited to the knowledge of the scientist's primary affiliation without further elaboration on their research outputs or collaborations.

Best Publications

  • Identification and characterization of the familial adenomatous polyposis coli gene

    Joanna Groden;Andrew Thliveris;Andrew Thliveris;Wade Samowitz;Mary Carlson

  • Charaterization of single nucleotide polymorphisms in coding regions of human genes

    David Altshuler;Michele Cargill;George Q. Daley;George Q. Daley;James S. Ireland

  • The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements

    Leming Shi;Laura H. Reid;Wendell D. Jones;Richard Shippy

  • Combined analysis of oligonucleotide microarray data from transgenic and knockout mice identifies direct SREBP target genes

    Jay D. Horton;Nila A. Shah;Janet A. Warrington;Norma N. Anderson

  • Identification of deletion mutations and three new genes at the familial polyposis locus

    Geoff Joslyn;Geoff Joslyn;Mary Carlson;Andrew Thliveris;Andrew Thliveris;Hans Albertsen

  • Comparison of human adult and fetal expression and identification of 535 housekeeping/maintenance genes

    Janet A. Warrington;Archana Nair;Mamatha Mahadevappa;Maya Tsyganskaya

  • Mutations in the Gene Encoding Cystatin B in Progressive Myoclonus Epilepsy (EPM1)

    Len A. Pennacchio;Anna-Elina Lehesjoki;Nancy E. Stone;Virginia L. Willour

  • Large-scale discovery and genotyping of single-nucleotide polymorphisms in the mouse.

    Kerstin Lindblad-Toh;Ellen Winchester;Mark J. Daly;David G. Wang;David G. Wang

  • A compendium of gene expression in normal human tissues.

    Li Li Hsiao;Fernando Dangond;Takumi Yoshida;Robert Hong

  • Identification of a Mammalian Long Chain Fatty Acyl Elongase Regulated by Sterol Regulatory Element-binding Proteins

    Young Ah Moon;Nila A. Shah;Suchismita Mohapatra;Janet A. Warrington

  • High-Throughput Variation Detection and Genotyping Using Microarrays

    David J. Cutler;Michael E. Zwick;Minerva M. Carrasquillo;Christopher T. Yohn

  • The balance of reproducibility, sensitivity, and specificity of lists of differentially expressed genes in microarray studies

    Leming Shi;Wendell D. Jones;Roderick V. Jensen;Stephen C. Harris

  • The External RNA Controls Consortium: a progress report.

    Shawn C Baker;Steven R Bauer;Richard P Beyer;James D Brenton

  • Bacterial transcript imaging by hybridization of total RNA to oligonucleotide arrays

    A de Saizieu;U Certa;J Warrington;C Gray

  • Gut Microbiota in Multiple Sclerosis: Possible Influence of Immunomodulators

    Brandi L. Cantarel;Emmanuelle Waubant;Christel Chehoud;Justin Kuczynski

  • BRCA1 transcriptionally regulates genes involved in breast tumorigenesis.

    Piri L. Welcsh;Ming K. Lee;Rachel M. Gonzalez-Hernandez;Daniel J. Black

  • Tissue Handling and Specimen Preparation in Surgical Pathology: Issues Concerning the Recovery of Nucleic Acids From Formalin-Fixed, Paraffin-Embedded Tissue

    Stephen M. Hewitt;Fraser A. Lewis;Yanxiang Cao;Richard C. Conrad

  • Oral cancer in vivo gene expression profiling assisted by laser capture microdissection and microarray analysis.

    I Alevizos;M Mahadevappa;X Zhang;H Ohyama

  • Molecular genetic profiling of Gleason grade 4/5 prostate cancers compared to benign prostatic hyperplasia.

    Thomas A. Stamey;Janet A. Warrington;Mitchell C. Caldwell;Zuxiong Chen

  • Comparison of frozen and RNALater solid tissue storage methods for use in RNA expression microarrays

    George L Mutter;David Zahrieh;Chunmei Liu;Donna Neuberg

Frequent Co-Authors

John J. Wasmuth
John J. Wasmuth University of California, Irvine
Leming Shi
Leming Shi Fudan University
David J. Lockhart
David J. Lockhart ReCode Therapeutics
Mark Leppert
Mark Leppert University of Utah
Raj K. Puri
Raj K. Puri US Food and Drug Administration
James C. Willey
James C. Willey University of Toledo
Weida Tong
Weida Tong National Center for Toxicological Research
Ray White
Ray White University of Utah
Richard M. Myers
Richard M. Myers HudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology
Huixiao Hong
Huixiao Hong United States Food and Drug Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Molecular Biology opens doors to many interdisciplinary careers—and many choose to enhance their qualifications through online study. For example, professionals in healthcare can consider transitioning into advanced practice roles via bsn to msn bridge programs, which are expanding the role of nurses in research and clinical settings.

When choosing an online degree, it's important to look for non profit online universities, which are recognized for their academic quality and affordability. Such schools often provide strong science and research tracks, making them suitable for molecular biology students.

If you are affiliated with the military, you can benefit from selecting one of the veteran friendly online colleges that offer flexible learning options and tailored support services.

Careers outside the lab, such as counseling or healthcare advocacy, can be pursued by earning a social work masters programs online, where science and social impact intersect. Consider these connected pathways as you plan your molecular biology journey.

Best Scientists Citing Janet A. Warrington

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles