World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Animal Science and Veterinary

D-Index
29
Citations
2809
World Ranking
2611
National Ranking
152

J. Huisman publication distribution in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Huisman sits on this spectrum.

29–33 publications: 1 scientists 34–38 publications: 6 scientists 39–43 publications: 17 scientists 44–48 publications: 23 scientists 49–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–58 publications: 44 scientists 59–63 publications: 66 scientists 64–68 publications: 75 scientists 69–73 publications: 71 scientists 74–78 publications: 85 scientists 79–83 publications: 108 scientists 84–88 publications: 105 scientists 89–93 publications: 84 scientists 94–98 publications: 103 scientists 99–103 publications: 97 scientists 104–108 publications: 95 scientists 109–113 publications: 89 scientists 114–118 publications: 88 scientists 119–123 publications: 109 scientists 124–128 publications: 93 scientists 129–133 publications: 89 scientists 134–138 publications: 95 scientists 139–143 publications: 92 scientists 144–148 publications: 80 scientists 149–153 publications: 75 scientists 154–158 publications: 74 scientists 159–163 publications: 67 scientists 164–168 publications: 53 scientists 169–173 publications: 62 scientists 174–178 publications: 63 scientists 179–183 publications: 50 scientists 184–188 publications: 55 scientists 189–193 publications: 50 scientists 194–198 publications: 27 scientists 199–203 publications: 44 scientists 204–208 publications: 31 scientists 209–213 publications: 28 scientists 214–218 publications: 38 scientists 219–223 publications: 33 scientists 224–228 publications: 36 scientists 229–233 publications: 29 scientists 234–238 publications: 35 scientists 239–243 publications: 23 scientists 244–248 publications: 24 scientists 249–253 publications: 29 scientists 254–258 publications: 28 scientists 259–263 publications: 21 scientists 264–268 publications: 25 scientists 269–273 publications: 11 scientists 274–278 publications: 18 scientists 279–283 publications: 13 scientists 284–288 publications: 18 scientists 289–293 publications: 10 scientists 294–298 publications: 12 scientists 299–303 publications: 11 scientists 304–308 publications: 15 scientists 309–313 publications: 14 scientists 314–318 publications: 14 scientists 319–323 publications: 8 scientists 324–328 publications: 8 scientists 329–333 publications: 13 scientists 334–338 publications: 14 scientists 339–343 publications: 13 scientists 344–348 publications: 10 scientists 349–353 publications: 11 scientists 354–358 publications: 5 scientists 359–363 publications: 8 scientists 364–368 publications: 8 scientists 369–373 publications: 6 scientists 374–378 publications: 7 scientists 379–383 publications: 8 scientists 384–388 publications: 3 scientists 389–393 publications: 4 scientists 394–398 publications: 5 scientists 399–403 publications: 8 scientists 404–408 publications: 5 scientists 409–413 publications: 4 scientists 414–418 publications: 3 scientists 419–423 publications: 8 scientists 424–428 publications: 5 scientists 429–433 publications: 3 scientists 434–438 publications: 5 scientists 439–441 publications: 5 scientists 442+ publications: 99 scientists
29 publications 442+

This scientist: 123 publications — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 442 publications or more.

J. Huisman D-index placement in Animal Science and Veterinary in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Animal Science and Veterinary scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. Huisman sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 5 scientists 21 D-Index: 22 scientists 22 D-Index: 31 scientists 23 D-Index: 44 scientists 24 D-Index: 53 scientists 25 D-Index: 66 scientists 26 D-Index: 80 scientists 27 D-Index: 101 scientists 28 D-Index: 106 scientists 29 D-Index: 116 scientists 30 D-Index: 154 scientists 31 D-Index: 158 scientists 32 D-Index: 143 scientists 33 D-Index: 137 scientists 34 D-Index: 126 scientists 35 D-Index: 134 scientists 36 D-Index: 112 scientists 37 D-Index: 115 scientists 38 D-Index: 105 scientists 39 D-Index: 111 scientists 40 D-Index: 107 scientists 41 D-Index: 87 scientists 42 D-Index: 74 scientists 43 D-Index: 62 scientists 44 D-Index: 61 scientists 45 D-Index: 41 scientists 46 D-Index: 51 scientists 47 D-Index: 43 scientists 48 D-Index: 28 scientists 49 D-Index: 47 scientists 50 D-Index: 40 scientists 51 D-Index: 34 scientists 52 D-Index: 33 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 16 scientists 55 D-Index: 32 scientists 56 D-Index: 21 scientists 57 D-Index: 18 scientists 58 D-Index: 28 scientists 59 D-Index: 33 scientists 60 D-Index: 17 scientists 61 D-Index: 21 scientists 62 D-Index: 18 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 9 scientists 65 D-Index: 20 scientists 66 D-Index: 11 scientists 67 D-Index: 16 scientists 68 D-Index: 12 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 13 scientists 71 D-Index: 15 scientists 72 D-Index: 11 scientists 73 D-Index: 11 scientists 74 D-Index: 14 scientists 75 D-Index: 5 scientists 76 D-Index: 6 scientists 77+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 77+

This scientist: 29 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 77 D-Index or more.

Overview

J. Huisman is affiliated with the University of Alberta in Canada. Their academic work is associated with this institution, which provides a context for their research activities and collaborations.

Although specific publications by J. Huisman are not listed, their recent works would reflect the research interests pursued at their primary affiliation.

Information about frequent co-authors or regular publication venues is not provided, suggesting that either collaborations and publication patterns are either varied or not extensively documented in the available data.

Details about their main fields of study, subfields, and main topics of work are not available, so a precise description of their research focus areas cannot be detailed. This absence limits a more targeted view of their scientific contributions.

No records of awarded distinctions or recognitions are specified, indicating no public data on accolades attributed to J. Huisman.

Best Publications

  • Effect of level of dietary neutral detergent fiber on ileal apparent digestibility and ileal nitrogen losses in pigs.

    H. Schulze;P. van Leeuwen;M.W.A. Verstegen;J. Huisman

  • The Post Valve T-Caecum cannulation technique in pigs applicated to determine the digestibility of amino acid in maize, groundnut and sunflower meal

    P. van Leeuwen;D. J. van Kleef;G. J. M. van Kempen;J. Huisman

  • Effects of hulls of faba beans (Vicia faba L.) with a low or high content of condensed tannins on the apparent ileal and fecal digestibility of nutrients and the excretion of endogenous protein in ileal digesta and feces of pigs.

    A.J.M. Jansman;M.W.A. Verstegen;J. Huisman;J.W.O. van den Berg

  • The nutritional significance of endogenous N-losses along the gastro-intestinal tract of farm animals.

    S. Tamminga;H. Schulze;J. van Bruchem;J. Huisman

  • Ileal apparent protein and amino acid digestibilities and endogenous nitrogen losses in pigs fed soybean and rapeseed products.

    W. Grala;M. W. A. Verstegen;A. J. M. Jansman;J. Huisman

  • The influence of α-galactosidase supplementation on the ileal digestibility of lupin seed carbohydrates and dietary protein in young pigs

    J. Gdala;A.J.M. Jansman;L. Buraczewska;J. Huisman

  • True protein digestibility and amounts of endogenous protein measured with the 15N-dilution technique in piglets fed on peas (Pisum sativum) and common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris).

    J. Huisman;Th. Heinz;A. F. B. Van Der Poel;P. Van Leeuwen

  • Aspects of the nutritional quality and use of cool season food legumes in animal feed

    J. Huisman;A. F. B. Van Der Poel

  • The use of 15N-labeled dietary proteins for determining true ileal amino acid digestibilities is limited by their rapid recycling in the endogenous secretions of pigs

    P. Leterme;A. Théwis;E. François;P. van Leeuwen

  • The concept of digestible amino acids in diet formulation for pigs

    R. Mosenthin;W.C. Sauer;R. Blank;J. Huisman

  • Pathologic changes of the small intestinal mucosa of pigs after feeding Phaseolus vulgaris beans.

    M. J. L. Kik;J. Huisman;A. F. B. van der Poel;J. M. V. M. Mouwen

  • Lupins (L. luteus, L. albus, L. angustifolius) as a protein source for young pigs

    J. Gdala;A.J.M. Jansman;P. van Leeuwen;J. Huisman

  • Cholesterol metabolism, digestion rates and postprandial changes in serum of swine fed purified diets containing either casein or soybean protein.

    A.C. Beynen;C.E. West;C.J.K. Spaaij;J. Huisman

  • The effect of including various structural polysaccharides in pig diets on ileal and faecal digestibility of amino acids and minerals

    L.A. Den Hartog;J. Huisman;W.J.G. Thielen;G.H.A. van Schayk

  • Ileal and faecal digestibility in piglets of field beans (Vicia faba L.) varying in tannin content.

    A.J.M. Jansman;J. Huisman;A.F.B. van der Poel

  • Effect of recombinant porcine somatotropin on growth and carcass quality in growing pigs: interactions with genotype, gender and slaughter weight.

    E. Kanis;G.J. Nieuwhof;K.H. de Greef;W. van der Hel

  • Recent advances of research in antinutritional factors in legume seeds : analytical methods, animal nutrition, feed (bio)technology, plant breeding : proceedings of the second international workshop on 'antinutritional factors (ANFs) in legume seeds', Wageningen, The Netherlands, 1-3 December 1993

    A.F.B. van der Poel;J. Huisman;H.S. Saini

  • Effects of a concentrate of pea antinutritional factors on pea protein digestibility in piglets

    M.P. Le Guen;J. Huisman;J. Guéguen;G. Beelen

  • Effect of condensed tannins in hulls of faba beans (Vicia faba L.) on the activities of trypsin (EC 2.4.21.4) and chymotrypsin (EC 2.4.21.1) in digesta collected from the small intestine of pigs.

    A. J. M. Jansman;H. Enting;M. W. A. Verstegen;J. Huisman

  • Effect of variable protein contents in diets containing Phaseolus vulgaris beans on performance, organ weights and blood variables in piglets, rats and chickens

    J. Huisman;A.F.B. van der Poel;J.M.V.M. Mouwen;E.J. van Weerden

  • The Evaluation of the Mobile Nylon Bag Technique for Determining the Apparent Protein Digestibility in a Wide Variety of Feedstuffs for Pigs

    W.C. Sauer;L.A. den Hartog;J. Huisman;P. van Leeuwen

  • Effects of dietary inclusion of hulls of faba beans (Vicia faba L.) with a low and high content of condensed tannins on digestion and some physiological parameters in piglets

    A.J.M. Jansman;M.W.A. Verstegen;J. Huisman

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin W. A. Verstegen
Martin W. A. Verstegen Wageningen University & Research
A.F.B. van der Poel
A.F.B. van der Poel Wageningen University & Research
L.A. den Hartog
L.A. den Hartog Wageningen University & Research
Willem C. Sauer
Willem C. Sauer University of Alberta
Rainer Mosenthin
Rainer Mosenthin University of Hohenheim
A. C. Beynen
A. C. Beynen Utrecht University
Seerp Tamminga
Seerp Tamminga Wageningen University & Research
C. F. M. de Lange
C. F. M. de Lange University of Guelph
Pascal Leterme
Pascal Leterme BASF (France)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Animal Science or Veterinary studies opens doors to diverse career opportunities, many of which benefit from interdisciplinary skills. For those interested in behavioral health aspects within animal care, exploring the best bcba programs can provide valuable expertise in behavior analysis and therapy.

Additionally, understanding psychological principles can enhance careers involving animal-assisted therapy or educational roles. This makes studying through nasp accredited school psychology programs or apa accredited online programs a beneficial complement to Animal Science education.

Moreover, for professionals aiming to support animals and humans affected by substance abuse, accredited credentials from accredited online colleges for drug and alcohol counseling offer pathways into counseling careers that bridge veterinary and human health fields.

Choosing the right accredited online degree can provide flexibility, credibility, and specialized knowledge to advance in various animal and human-centered professions.

Best Scientists Citing J. Huisman

Recently Published Articles