World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 48 3047 2793 1476 1332 82 18622

Isabel L. Beck publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Isabel L. Beck between 1978 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Isabel L. Beck published across 49 years, from 1978 to 2026, averaging 1.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 6 publications in 1983. 1 of the 84 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 6. Peak 6 publications in 1983. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 4 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 6 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 6 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 3 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 2 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 3 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 2 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 1 publication 2009: 2 publications 2010: 1 publication 2011: 0 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 2 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 1 publication 2017: 1 publication 2018: 2 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 0 publications 2025: 0 publications 2026: 1 publication
1978 2026

84 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Isabel L. Beck: publications per year, 1978 to 2026
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 0
1980 0
1981 4
1982 3
1983 6
1984 5
1985 6
1986 3
1987 3
1988 2
1989 2
1990 1
1991 3
1992 3
1993 2
1994 2
1995 2
1996 2
1997 2
1998 2
1999 4
2000 0
2001 2
2002 1
2003 3
2004 1
2005 1
2006 2
2007 1
2008 1
2009 2
2010 1
2011 0
2012 1
2013 2
2014 2
2015 1
2016 1
2017 1
2018 2
2019 0
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 0
2024 0
2025 0
2026 1
Total 84
Download as CSV

Isabel L. Beck publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Isabel L. Beck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 74–83 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 82 publications — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225 82
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Isabel L. Beck D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Isabel L. Beck sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 48 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203 48
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Isabel L. Beck is affiliated with the University of Pittsburgh in the United States. The researcher's professional focus is grounded within this institutional context, contributing to academic activities and scholarly endeavors.

There are no specific details available regarding recent publications or notable papers authored by this scientist. Similarly, no frequent co-authors or predominant publication venues have been documented, which limits further insight into collaboration patterns or preferred outlets for disseminating research.

Information on book publications is likewise unavailable, making it difficult to ascertain involvement in extended academic publishing or contributions to monographs and edited volumes. The same applies to detailed data on primary fields and subfields of study, as no such classifications or counts have been recorded.

No principal research topics have been listed, which restricts the identification of particular thematic areas or subject matters that Isabel L. Beck might focus on.

Details about awards or honors confer additional recognition or milestones are not present in this dataset.

Given that the researcher is not deceased, ongoing research, teaching, or institutional activities can be assumed but are not detailed here.

Best Publications

  • Bringing Words to Life : Robust Vocabulary Instruction

    Isabel L. Beck;Margaret G. McKeown;Linda Kucan

  • Effects of Long-Term Vocabulary Instruction on Lexical Access and Reading Comprehension.

    Isabel L. Beck;Charles A. Perfetti;Margaret G. McKeown

  • Phonemic knowledge and learning to read are reciprocal: A longitudinal study of first grade children.

    Charles A. Perfetti;Isabel Beck;Laura C. Bell;Carol Hughes

  • Increasing Young Low‐Income Children’s Oral Vocabulary Repertoires through Rich and Focused Instruction

    Isabel L. Beck;Margaret G. McKeown

  • Thinking Aloud and Reading Comprehension Research: Inquiry, Instruction, and Social Interaction:

    Linda Kucan;Isabel L. Beck

  • Some effects of the nature and frequency of vocabulary instruction on the knowledge and use of words

    Margaret G. Mckeown;Isabel L. Beck;Richard C. Omanson;Martha T. Pople

  • Revising Social Studies Text from a Text-Processing Perspective: Evidence of Improved Comprehensibility.

    Isabel L. Beck;Margaret G. McKeown;Gale M. Sinatra;Jane A. Loxterman

  • Questioning the author: A yearlong classroom implementation to engage students with text

    Isabel L. Beck;Margaret G. McKeown;Cheryl Sandora;Linda Kucan

  • The Effects of Long-Term Vocabulary Instruction on Reading Comprehension: A Replication:

    Margaret G. McKeown;Isabel L. Beck;Richard C. Omanson;Charles A. Perfetti

  • The Effects and Uses of Diverse Vocabulary Instructional Techniques

    Isabel L. Beck;Margaret G. McKeown;Richard C. Omanson

  • Text Talk: Capturing the Benefits of Read-Aloud Experiences for Young Children.

    Isabel L. Beck;Margaret G. McKeown

  • Conditions of Vocabulary Acquisition

    Isabel Beck;Margaret McKeown

  • Rethinking Reading Comprehension Instruction: A Comparison of Instruction for Strategies and Content Approaches

    Margaret G. McKeown;Isabel L. Beck;Ronette G.K. Blake

  • The Contribution of Prior Knowledge and Coherent Text to Comprehension.

    Margaret G. McKeown;Isabel L. Beck;Gale M. Sinatra;Jane A. Loxterman

  • Creating Robust Vocabulary: Frequently Asked Questions and Extended Examples

    Isabel L. Beck;Margaret G. McKeown;Linda Kucan

  • Focusing attention on decoding for children with poor reading skills: Design and preliminary tests of the Word Building intervention

    Bruce McCandliss;Isabel L. Beck;Rebecca Sandak;Charles Perfetti

  • Questioning the Author: An Approach for Enhancing Student Engagement With Text

    Isabel L. Beck

  • Vocabulary Development: All Contexts Are Not Created Equal

    Isabel L. Beck;Margaret G. McKeown;Ellen S. McCaslin

  • Effective Literacy Teaching for English-Language Learners

    Timothy Shanahan;Isabel L. Beck

  • Learning From Social Studies Texts

    Isabel L. Beck;Margaret G. McKeown;Erika W. Gromoll

Frequent Co-Authors

Margaret G. McKeown
Margaret G. McKeown University of Pittsburgh
Charles A. Perfetti
Charles A. Perfetti University of Pittsburgh
Gale M. Sinatra
Gale M. Sinatra University of Southern California
Bruce D. McCandliss
Bruce D. McCandliss Stanford University
James F. Voss
James F. Voss University of Pittsburgh
Timothy Shanahan
Timothy Shanahan University of Illinois at Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA can open doors to a variety of flexible online degree options. Whether you want to advance in psychology, education, or other fields, online programs offer both convenience and adaptability for working professionals or busy students.

Cost is often a top concern, especially for graduate studies. If you're considering a master’s in psychology, explore how much does a masters in psychology cost to compare tuition rates, financial aid, and program affordability.

For educators seeking leadership roles, there are many easiest edd programs available online. These pathways can minimize time to graduation while maintaining academic rigor.

Fast-paced learners can benefit from master degree online programs designed to finish in as little as one year, providing a quick return on investment. Similarly, pursuing one of the accelerated online degrees may help you enter the workforce sooner.

With a range of online and accelerated options, there is a flexible pathway for every ambition within Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Isabel L. Beck

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles