World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
12953
World Ranking
10701
National Ranking
5590

Garold Stasser publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Garold Stasser sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 49 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Garold Stasser D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Garold Stasser sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Garold Stasser is affiliated with Miami University in the United States. The available information does not include recent publications, co-authors, or specific fields of study related to their research.

There is no data on published papers, frequent publication venues, or book publications associated with Garold Stasser. Additionally, no particular main or subfields of study or research topics are listed.

There are no awards recorded for this individual, and they are currently living.

This profile reflects the limited available public data on Garold Stasser's academic contributions and affiliations.

Best Publications

  • Pooling of Unshared Information in Group Decision Making: Biased Information Sampling During Discussion

    Garold Stasser;William Titus

  • Effects of information load and percentage of shared information on the dissemination of unshared information during group discussion.

    Garold Stasser;William Titus

  • Discovery of Hidden Profiles by Decision-Making Groups: Solving a Problem Versus Making a Judgment

    Garold Stasser;Dennis Stewart

  • Expert Roles and Information Exchange during Discussion: The Importance of Knowing Who Knows What

    Garold Stasser;Dennis D. Stewart;Gwen M. Wittenbaum

  • Information sampling in structured and unstructured discussions of three- and six-person groups.

    Garold Stasser;Laurie A. Taylor;Coleen Hanna

  • Management of information in small groups.

    Gwen M. Wittenbaum;Garold Stasser

  • Expert role assignment and information sampling during collective recall and decision making.

    Dennis D. Stewart;Garold Stasser

  • Hidden Profiles: A Brief History

    Garold Stasser;William Titus

  • Pooling Unshared Information: The Benefits of Knowing How Access to Information Is Distributed among Group Members

    Garold Stasser;Sandra I Vaughan;Dennis D Stewart

  • Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes

    Michael A. Hogg;R. Scott Tindale

  • The uncertain role of unshared information in collective choice.

    Garold Stasser

  • Information salience and the discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: A “thought experiment”☆

    Garold Stasser

  • Computer simulation as a research tool: The DISCUSS model of group decision making

    Garold Stasser

  • Guilt beyond a reasonable doubt: Effects of concept definition and assigned decision rule on the judgments of mock jurors.

    Norbert L. Kerr;Robert S. Atkin;Garold Stasser;David Meek

  • Influence processes and consensus models in decision-making groups.

    G Stasser;Norbert L. Kerr;G.H. Davis

  • Group decision making and social influence: A social interaction sequence model.

    Garold Stasser;James H. Davis

  • Group Creativity and Collective Choice

    Garold Stasser;Zachary Birchmeier

  • Tacit coordination in anticipation of small group task completion.

    Gwen M. Wittenbaum;Garold Stasser;Carol J. Merry

  • The sampling of critical, unshared information in decision-making groups: the role of an informed minority

    Dennis D. Stewart;Garold Stasser

  • Speaking turns in face-to-face discussions.

    Garold Stasser;Laurie A. Taylor

Frequent Co-Authors

Norbert L. Kerr
Norbert L. Kerr Michigan State University
Terri L. Messman-Moore
Terri L. Messman-Moore Miami University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide range of online degrees and career pathways, especially in counseling, mental health, and human services. As demand grows for qualified professionals, students increasingly seek programs that fit their budget and offer flexibility.

If you are searching for affordable options, consider exploring the most affordable counseling degree programs in Boston. These programs provide cost-effective routes to earning a respected counseling degree in a vibrant urban setting.

For those looking at the West Coast, numerous affordable counseling programs in California offer accredited online and campus-based degrees tailored to aspiring counselors.

The Midwest is also home to some of the most affordable counseling degree programs in Chicago, renowned for their academic rigor and practical training.

Additionally, those interested in working in thriving counseling communities may consider the most affordable counseling degree programs in Colorado. Each of these options can prepare you for licensure or alternative careers, making your investment in psychology both impactful and attainable.

Best Scientists Citing Garold Stasser

Trending Scientists