World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Stefan Abrahamczyk

Stefan Abrahamczyk

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
32
Citations
3596
World Ranking
8117
National Ranking
415

Stefan Abrahamczyk publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Abrahamczyk sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 72 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Stefan Abrahamczyk D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stefan Abrahamczyk sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Stefan Abrahamczyk is affiliated with the University of Bonn in Germany and specializes in the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences as well as Environmental Science. Their research primarily focuses on Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, with significant contributions to Plant Science, Nature and Landscape Conservation, and Molecular Biology.

The scientist's work covers a diverse range of topics including Plant and Animal Studies, Plant Parasitism and Resistance, Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Plant Diversity and Evolution, Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions, Forest Insect Ecology and Management, and Entomological Studies and Ecology.

Stefan Abrahamczyk has published extensively in various scientific venues. These include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Functional Ecology
  • Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
  • Annals of Botany
  • Ecology and Evolution

Their recent publications include:

  • "Ecological filtering shapes the impacts of agricultural deforestation on biodiversity," 2024, Nature Ecology & Evolution
  • "Macroevolution of the plant-hummingbird pollination system," 2024, Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
  • "The best of two worlds: ecology and evolution of ambophilous plants," 2022, Biological reviews/Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society
  • "The influence of biogeographical and evolutionary histories on morphological trait-matching and resource specialization in mutualistic hummingbird-plant networks," 2021, Functional Ecology
  • "Shifts in food plant abundance for flower-visiting insects between 1900 and 2017 in the canton of Zurich, Switzerland," 2020, Ecological Applications

Stefan Abrahamczyk collaborates frequently with multiple co-authors, most notably Maximilian Weigend, María A. Maglianesi, Eberhard Fischer, Juan Francisco Ornelas, and Michael Kessler.

Best Publications

  • Specialization of Mutualistic Interaction Networks Decreases toward Tropical Latitudes

    Matthias Schleuning;Jochen Fründ;Alexandra-Maria Klein;Stefan Abrahamczyk;Stefan Abrahamczyk

  • The database of the PREDICTS (Projecting Responses of Ecological Diversity In Changing Terrestrial Systems) project

    Lawrence N. Hudson;Tim Newbold;Tim Newbold;Sara Contu;Samantha L.L. Hill;Samantha L.L. Hill

  • The PREDICTS database: a global database of how local terrestrial biodiversity responds to human impacts

    Lawrence N Hudson;Tim Newbold;Tim Newbold;Sara Contu;Samantha L L Hill;Samantha L L Hill

  • Alpha and beta diversity of plants and animals along a tropical land-use gradient.

    Michael Kessler;Michael Kessler;Stefan Abrahamczyk;Stefan Abrahamczyk;Merijn Bos;Damayanti Buchori

  • Predicting bee community responses to land-use changes : Effects of geographic and taxonomic biases

    Adriana De Palma;Adriana De Palma;Stefan Abrahamczyk;Marcelo A. Aizen;Matthias Albrecht

  • The macroecology of phylogenetically structured hummingbird–plant networks

    Ana M. Martín González;Bo Dalsgaard;David Nogués-Bravo;Catherine H. Graham

  • Diversity patterns of ferns along elevational gradients in Andean tropical forests

    Laura Salazar;Jürgen Homeier;Michael Kessler;Stefan Abrahamczyk

  • Global patterns of interaction specialization in bird–flower networks

    Thais B. Zanata;Thais B. Zanata;Bo Dalsgaard;Fernando C. Passos;Peter A. Cotton

  • The Influence of Climatic Seasonality on the Diversity of Different Tropical Pollinator Groups

    Stefan Abrahamczyk;Jürgen Kluge;Jürgen Kluge;Yuvinka Gareca;Steffen Reichle

  • Escape from extreme specialization: passionflowers, bats and the sword-billed hummingbird

    S. Abrahamczyk;D. Souto-Vilarós;S. S. Renner

  • Can Joint Carbon and Biodiversity Management in Tropical Agroforestry Landscapes Be Optimized

    Michael Kessler;Dietrich Hertel;Hermann F. Jungkunst;Jürgen Kluge;Jürgen Kluge

  • Bryophyte cover on trees as proxy for air humidity in the tropics

    Dirk Nikolaus Karger;Jürgen Kluge;Stefan Abrahamczyk;Laura Salazar

  • Sampling Hymenoptera along a precipitation gradient in tropical forests: the effectiveness of different coloured pan traps

    Stefan Abrahamczyk;Bastian Steudel;Michael Kessler

  • Morphological and behavioural adaptations to feed on nectar: how feeding ecology determines the diversity and composition of hummingbird assemblages

    Stefan Abrahamczyk;Stefan Abrahamczyk;Michael Kessler

  • The influence of biogeographical and evolutionary histories on morphological trait‐matching and resource specialization in mutualistic hummingbird–plant networks

    Bo Dalsgaard;Pietro Kiyoshi Maruyama;Jesper Sonne;Katrine Hansen

  • Pollinator adaptation and the evolution of floral nectar sugar composition

    Stefan Abrahamczyk;Michael Kessler;Daniel Hanley;Dirk Nikolaus Karger

  • Cost-effectiveness of plant and animal biodiversity indicators in tropical forest and agroforest habitats

    Michael Kessler;Michael Kessler;Stefan Abrahamczyk;Stefan Abrahamczyk;Merijn Bos;Damayanti Buchori

  • Global fern and lycophyte richness explained: How regional and local factors shape plot richness

    Anna Weigand;Stefan Abrahamczyk;Isabelle Aubin;Claudia Bita-Nicolae

  • Diversity and community composition of euglossine bee assemblages (Hymenoptera: Apidae) in western Amazonia

    Stefan Abrahamczyk;Peter Gottleuber;Christian Matauschek;Michael Kessler

  • The value of differently managed cacao plantations for forest bird conservation in Sulawesi, Indonesia

    Stefan Abrahamczyk;Michael Kessler;Dadang Dwi Putra;Matthias Waltert

  • Functional diversity mediates macroecological variation in plant-hummingbird interaction networks

    Pietro Kiyoshi Maruyama;Pietro Kiyoshi Maruyama;Pietro Kiyoshi Maruyama;Jesper Sonne;Jeferson Vizentin-Bugoni;Jeferson Vizentin-Bugoni;Ana M. Martín González

  • The temporal build-up of hummingbird/plant mutualisms in North America and temperate South America

    Stefan Abrahamczyk;Stefan Abrahamczyk;Susanne S. Renner

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Kessler
Michael Kessler University of Zurich
Teja Tscharntke
Teja Tscharntke University of Göttingen
Tim Diekötter
Tim Diekötter Kiel University
Jason M. Tylianakis
Jason M. Tylianakis University of Canterbury
Andy Purvis
Andy Purvis Natural History Museum
Tom M. Fayle
Tom M. Fayle Queen Mary University of London
Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter
Ingolf Steffan-Dewenter University of Würzburg
Steven J. Fonte
Steven J. Fonte Colorado State University
Alain Dejean
Alain Dejean Paul Sabatier University
Jérémy Bouyer
Jérémy Bouyer INRAE : Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re passionate about Ecology and Evolution but considering diverse career options, online degrees offer flexible pathways. Many students pursue adjacent fields such as library science or healthcare, building on their analytical and research skills.

For those interested in supporting scientific inquiry, a Master of Library and Information Science is a popular route. The average cost of mlis degree us is a key factor for prospective students—affordable programs make this an accessible option.

Healthcare also draws many science graduates. Students can become speech-language pathologists by enrolling in asha certified slp programs, or for those from different backgrounds, online bridge programs non-SLP majors are available. Both pathways emphasize evidence-based practice and flexible learning options.

Alternatively, some graduates transition into nursing. The popularity of accelerated nursing programs for non nurses online reflects growing demand for science-trained healthcare professionals.

Exploring interdisciplinary online degrees can broaden your career choices while allowing you to apply ecological and evolutionary knowledge in unique, impactful ways.

Best Scientists Citing Stefan Abrahamczyk

Trending Scientists