World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
62
Citations
13999
World Ranking
10780
National Ranking
826

Adrian M. Lister publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adrian M. Lister sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 199 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Adrian M. Lister D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adrian M. Lister sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Adrian M. Lister is affiliated with the Natural History Museum in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans several interconnected fields including biochemistry, genetics and molecular biology, environmental science, and earth and planetary sciences. The scientist's work contributes extensively to understanding ecological and evolutionary processes through both modern and ancient perspectives.

The main subfields addressed by Lister include ecology, genetics, molecular biology, paleontology, and anthropology. This diverse expertise supports research into topics such as wildlife ecology and conservation, Pleistocene-era hominins and archaeology, genetic diversity and population structure, identification and quantification in food, archaeology and ancient environmental studies, evolution and paleontology studies, and geology and paleoclimatology research.

Recent academic publications reflect these areas of focus with studies published in notable venues and covering significant evolutionary and genomic history. Key papers authored or coauthored by Lister include:

  • "Million-year-old DNA sheds light on the genomic history of mammoths" (2021, Nature)
  • "Ancient and modern genomes unravel the evolutionary history of the rhinoceros family" (2021, Cell)
  • "Pre-extinction Demographic Stability and Genomic Signatures of Adaptation in the Woolly Rhinoceros" (2020, Current Biology)
  • "Late Pleistocene paleoecology and phylogeography of woolly rhinoceroses" (2021, Quaternary Science Reviews)
  • "Genomics of adaptive evolution in the woolly mammoth" (2023, Current Biology)

These publications demonstrate frequent contributions to journals such as Quaternary Science Reviews, Current Biology, Cell, Nature Ecology & Evolution, and the Journal of Biogeography. The scientist's work often involves the integration of genomic data and paleoecological findings to analyze evolutionary patterns and environmental changes during the Pleistocene epoch.

Adrian M. Lister collaborates regularly with several researchers, which reflects the interdisciplinary and collaborative nature of their work. Frequent coauthors include Love Dalén, David Díez-del-Molino, Tom van der Valk, Marianne Dehasque, and Peter D. Heintzman.

Best Publications

  • Refugia revisited: individualistic responses of species in space and time

    John R. Stewart;Adrian M. Lister;Ian Barnes;Love Dalén

  • Cryptic northern refugia and the origins of the modern biota

    John R. Stewart;Adrian M. Lister

  • Western Palaearctic palaeoenvironmental conditions during the Early and early Middle Pleistocene inferred from large mammal communities, and implications for hominin dispersal in Europe

    Ralf-Dietrich Kahlke;Nuria García;Dimitris S. Kostopoulos;Frédéric Lacombat

  • Million-year-old DNA sheds light on the genomic history of mammoths

    Tom van der Valk;Tom van der Valk;Patrícia Pečnerová;Patrícia Pečnerová;Patrícia Pečnerová;David Díez-del-Molino;David Díez-del-Molino;Anders Bergström

  • Multiplex amplification of the mammoth mitochondrial genome and the evolution of Elephantidae

    Johannes Krause;Paul H. Dear;Joshua L. Pollack;Montgomery Slatkin

  • The impact of Quaternary Ice Ages on mammalian evolution.

    Adrian M. Lister

  • Natural history collections as sources of long-term datasets.

    Adrian M. Lister

  • The preservation of glacial-interglacial climatic signatures in the oxygen isotopes of elephant skeletal phosphate

    L.K. Ayliffe;L.K. Ayliffe;A.M. Lister;A.R. Chivas

  • A long-term perspective on ungulate–vegetation interactions

    Richard H.W Bradshaw;Gina E Hannon;Adrian M Lister

  • The pattern and process of mammoth evolution in Eurasia

    Adrian M. Lister;Andrei V. Sher;Hans van Essen;Guangbiao Wei

  • The latest woolly mammoths (Mammuthus primigenius Blumenbach) in Europe and Asia: a review of the current evidence

    Anthony J. Stuart;Leopold D. Sulerzhitsky;Lyobov A. Orlova;Yaroslav V. Kuzmin

  • The Origin and Evolution of the Woolly Mammoth

    Adrian M. Lister;Andrei V. Sher

  • A Butchered elephant skull and associated artifacts from the Acheulian site of Gesher Benot Ya'Aqov, Israel

    Naama Goren-Inbar;Adrian Lister;Ella Werker;Mario Chech

  • Extinction chronology of the woolly rhinoceros Coelodonta antiquitatis in the context of late Quaternary megafaunal extinctions in northern Eurasia

    Anthony J. Stuart;Adrian M. Lister

  • Genetic Structure and Extinction of the Woolly Mammoth, Mammuthus primigenius

    Ian Barnes;Beth Shapiro;Adrian Lister;Adrian Lister;Tatiana Kuznetsova

  • DNA from ancient mammoth bones

    Erika Hagelberg;Mark G. Thomas;Charles E. Cook;Andrei V. Sher

  • Extinction chronology of the cave lion Panthera spelaea

    Anthony J. Stuart;Adrian M. Lister

  • Climate Change and Biosphere Response: Unlocking the Collections Vault

    Kenneth G. Johnson;Stephen J. Brooks;Phillip B. Fenberg;Adrian G. Glover

  • The morphological distinction between bones and teeth of fallow deer (Dama dama) and red deer (Cervus elaphus)

    Adrian M. Lister

  • Frozen fauna of the mammoth steppe: the story of blue babe

    Adrian M. Lister

Frequent Co-Authors

Ian Barnes
Ian Barnes Natural History Museum
Love Dalén
Love Dalén Stockholm University
Simon A. Parfitt
Simon A. Parfitt University College London
Florent Rivals
Florent Rivals Rovira i Virgili University
Mark G. Thomas
Mark G. Thomas University College London
Kirsty Penkman
Kirsty Penkman University of York
Eske Willerslev
Eske Willerslev University of Copenhagen
M. Thomas P. Gilbert
M. Thomas P. Gilbert University of Copenhagen
Richard C. Preece
Richard C. Preece University of Cambridge
Michael Hofreiter
Michael Hofreiter University of Potsdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to rewarding career paths beyond traditional lab roles. Many students explore healthcare avenues such as medical coding, billing, or health information management, especially as demand for these roles continues to grow.

Becoming a certified professional coder is a popular choice for those who want to blend science knowledge with administrative skills. Certification options vary, and each offers different benefits for salary and job prospects.

For those curious about compensation, recent data shows that a medical.coding salary can be competitive, particularly with experience and additional certifications.

So, is medical billing and coding in demand? Absolutely—healthcare employers increasingly rely on skilled coders and billers as patient data becomes more complex and essential to manage effectively.

If you’re seeking flexible study options, consider a health information management degree online. These programs prepare graduates for roles in modern healthcare systems while allowing you to learn from anywhere.

Best Scientists Citing Adrian M. Lister

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles