World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
102
Citations
34814
World Ranking
7716
National Ranking
4013

Frederick G. Behm publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick G. Behm sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 257 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Frederick G. Behm D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Frederick G. Behm sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Frederick G. Behm is affiliated with the University of Illinois at Chicago in the United States and has contributed to the field of Medicine with a focus on various specialized subfields. Their research spans pulmonary and respiratory medicine, psychiatry and mental health, cancer research, public health, environmental and occupational health, and pediatrics, perinatology, and child health.

The scientist has published work related to key topics including:

  • Fibromyalgia and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome Research
  • Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Cancer, Lipids, and Metabolism
  • Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Research
  • Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
  • Epigenetics and DNA Methylation

Frederick G. Behm's recent papers include the following:

  • Identification of unique genomic signatures in patients with fibromyalgia and chronic pain, 2024, Scientific Reports
  • In-Depth Comparison of Genetic Variants Demonstrates a Close Relationship Between Invasive and Intraductal Components of Prostate Cancer, 2023, Modern Pathology
  • Utilization of cytologic cell blocks for targeted sequencing of solid tumors, 2022, Cancer Medicine
  • KMT2A partner genes in infant acute lymphoblastic leukemia have prognostic significance and correlate with age, white blood cell count, sex, and central nervous system involvement: a Children's Oncology Group P9407 trial study, 2023, Haematologica
  • Interleukin Deficiency Disorder Patient Responses to COVID-19 Infections, 2021, Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research

Frequent co-authors of Frederick G. Behm include:

  • Gayatry Mohapatra
  • Erica Vormittag-Nocito
  • Bruce S. Gillis
  • Kunwar Digvijay Narayan
  • Ravindra Kumar

The scholar's work is published across several recognized venues, notably:

  • Scientific Reports
  • Modern Pathology
  • Haematologica
  • Cancer Medicine
  • Journal of Advances in Medicine and Medical Research

Best Publications

  • Classification, subtype discovery, and prediction of outcome in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia by gene expression profiling.

    Eng Juh Yeoh;Mary E. Ross;Sheila A. Shurtleff;W. Kent Williams

  • Gene expression signatures define novel oncogenic pathways in T cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    Adolfo A Ferrando;Donna S Neuberg;Jane Staunton;Mignon L Loh

  • Early T-cell precursor leukaemia: a subtype of very high-risk acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

    Elaine Coustan-Smith;Charles G. Mullighan;Mihaela Onciu;Frederick G. Behm

  • Caspase 8 is deleted or silenced preferentially in childhood neuroblastomas with amplification of MYCN

    T Teitz;T Wei;M B Valentine;E F Vanin

  • The translocation t(8;16)(p11;p13) of acute myeloid leukaemia fuses a putative acetyltransferase to the CREB–binding protein

    Julian Borrow;Vincent P. Stanton;J. Michael Andresen;Reinhard Becher

  • Acute myeloid leukemia in children treated with epipodophyllotoxins for acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

    C H Pui;R C Ribeiro;M L Hancock;G K Rivera

  • TEL/AML1 fusion resulting from a cryptic t(12;21) is the most common genetic lesion in pediatric ALL and defines a subgroup of patients with an excellent prognosis.

    Shurtleff Sa;Buijs A;Behm Fg;Rubnitz Je

  • Clinical importance of minimal residual disease in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

    Elaine Coustan-Smith;Jose Sancho;Michael L. Hancock;James M. Boyett

  • Immunological detection of minimal residual disease in children with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia

    Elaine Coustan-Smith;Frederick G. Behm;Frederick G. Behm;Joaquin Sanchez;James M. Boyett;James M. Boyett

  • Secondary acute myeloid leukemia in children treated for acute lymphoid leukemia.

    Ching-Hon Pui;Frederick G. Behm;Susana C. Raimondi;Richard K. Dodge

  • Improved outcome for children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: Results of Total Therapy Study XIIIB at St Jude Children's Research Hospital

    Ching Hon Pui;John T. Sandlund;Deqing Pei;Dario Campana

  • Improved outcome in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia with reinforced early treatment and rotational combination chemotherapy

    G.K. Rivera;G.K. Rivera;C.-H. Pui;C.-H. Pui;M. Abromowitch;M. Abromowitch;J. Mirro;J. Mirro

  • Chromosomal abnormalities in 478 children with acute myeloid leukemia: clinical characteristics and treatment outcome in a cooperative pediatric oncology group study-POG 8821.

    S C Raimondi;M N Chang;Y Ravindranath;F G Behm

  • Clinical and biologic relevance of immunologic marker studies in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    Ching Hon Pui;Frederick G. Behm;William M. Crist

  • Prognostic importance of measuring early clearance of leukemic cells by flow cytometry in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

    Elaine Coustan-Smith;Jose Sancho;Frederick G. Behm;Michael L. Hancock

  • Retrovirus-Mediated Gene Transfer of NPM-ALK Causes Lymphoid Malignancy in Mice

    Martin U. Kuefer;A. Thomas Look;Karen Pulford;Frederick G. Behm

  • Cumulative Incidence of Secondary Neoplasms as a First Event After Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

    Nobuko Hijiya;Melissa M. Hudson;Shelly Lensing;Margie Zacher

  • Bone marrow-derived stromal cells prevent apoptotic cell death in B- lineage acute lymphoblastic leukemia

    Atsushi Manabe;Elaine Coustan-Smith;Frederick G. Behm;Susana C. Raimondi

  • Clinical characteristics and treatment outcome of childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia with the t(4;11)(q21;q23): a collaborative study of 40 cases.

    Ching Hon Pui;Lawrence S. Frankel;Andrew J. Carroll;Susana C. Raimondi

  • Poor prognosis of children with pre-B acute lymphoblastic leukemia is associated with the t(1;19)(q23;p13): a Pediatric Oncology Group study

    WM Crist;AJ Carroll;JJ Shuster;FG Behm

Frequent Co-Authors

Susana C. Raimondi
Susana C. Raimondi St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Ching-Hon Pui
Ching-Hon Pui St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Gaston K. Rivera
Gaston K. Rivera St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Raul C. Ribeiro
Raul C. Ribeiro St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
John T. Sandlund
John T. Sandlund National Institutes of Health
David R. Head
David R. Head Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Dario Campana
Dario Campana National University of Singapore
Jeffrey E. Rubnitz
Jeffrey E. Rubnitz St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
William M. Crist
William M. Crist University of Oklahoma
James R. Downing
James R. Downing St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in Medicine doesn’t always follow a single straight path, and there are many accredited online options for those interested in entering or advancing in the healthcare field. For registered nurses looking to further their education, online rn-bsn programs without clinicals offer a flexible option to obtain a bachelor’s degree without the need for additional in-person clinical hours.

For nurses looking to move into leadership or advanced practice, there are dnp programs online that allow you to earn your Doctor of Nursing Practice from anywhere, often at an accelerated pace. Some individuals may be interested in programs that are more accessible; easy dnp programs highlight less competitive admissions or more manageable coursework.

For those starting their nursing career, a lpn fast track program can be an excellent first step, providing foundational skills and rapid entry into the workforce. Exploring these online pathways can open new doors in the medical field and create new opportunities for career growth.

Best Scientists Citing Frederick G. Behm

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles