World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
37
Citations
6491
World Ranking
9149
National Ranking
4851

Elizabeth M. Zelinski publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth M. Zelinski sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 122 publications — 34th percentile

34% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Elizabeth M. Zelinski D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Elizabeth M. Zelinski sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Elizabeth M. Zelinski is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Psychology and Social Sciences, with a substantial body of work spanning 45 and 24 publications respectively in these fields.

Their subfields of study highlight expertise in Clinical Psychology and Health, each with 12 publications, followed by Experimental and Cognitive Psychology with 10 publications. Additional subfields include Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (9 publications) and Applied Psychology (7 publications).

Elizabeth M. Zelinski's main topics of research involve Health Disparities and Outcomes (24 publications), Aging and Gerontology Research (18 publications), and Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (12 publications). Other important topics include Personality Traits and Psychology as well as Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction, each with 10 publications. Behavioral Health and Interventions and Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research have 8 publications each.

Their work has been published in various venues, with the most frequent being Innovation in Aging (16 publications). Other venues include Collabra Psychology (3 publications), The Journals of Gerontology Series B (3 publications), Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (2 publications), and Computers in Human Behavior (1 publication).

Recent publications by Elizabeth M. Zelinski include:

  • Is Healthy Neuroticism Associated with Health Behaviors? A Coordinated Integrative Data Analysis, 2020, Collabra Psychology
  • Information and communication technology use in older adults: A unidirectional or Bi-directional association with cognitive function?, 2021, Computers in Human Behavior
  • Is Healthy Neuroticism Associated with Chronic Conditions? A Coordinated Integrative Data Analysis, 2020, Collabra Psychology
  • Is Healthy Neuroticism Associated with Longevity? A Coordinated Integrative Data Analysis, 2020, Collabra Psychology
  • The Association Between Spousal Education and Cognitive Ability Among Older Mexican Adults, 2020, The Journals of Gerontology Series B

Their frequent co-authors include Stefan Schneider, Erik Meijer, Arthur A. Stone, Kristi M. Wisniewski, and Doerte U. Junghaenel, with collaboration counts ranging from seven to eight publications each.

Best Publications

  • A Cognitive Training Program Based on Principles of Brain Plasticity: Results from the Improvement in Memory with Plasticity-based Adaptive Cognitive Training (IMPACT) Study

    Glenn E. Smith;Patricia Housen;Kristine Yaffe;Ronald Ruff

  • The Memory Functioning Questionnaire for assessment of memory complaints in adulthood and old age.

    M J Gilewski;E M Zelinski;K W Schaie

  • The Memory Functioning Questionnaire for assessment of memory complaints in adulthood and old age.

    Unknown

  • Sixteen-year longitudinal and time lag changes in memory and cognition in older adults.

    Elizabeth M. Zelinski;Kerry P. Burnight

  • Personality predicts mortality risk: An integrative data analysis of 15 international longitudinal studies

    Eileen Kranz Graham;Joshua P. Rutsohn;Nicholas A. Turiano;Rebecca Bendayan

  • Individual differences in cross-sectional and 3-year longitudinal memory performance across the adult life span.

    Zelinski Em;Gilewski Mj;Schaie Kw

  • Memory for spatial information in young and old adults.

    Leah L. Light;Elizabeth M. Zelinski

  • Far transfer in cognitive training of older adults.

    Elizabeth M. Zelinski

  • Questionnaire assessment of memory complaints.

    Michael J. Gilewski;Elizabeth M. Zelinski

  • The Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive-Plus (ADAS-Cog-Plus): an expansion of the ADAS-Cog to improve responsiveness in MCI

    Jeannine Skinner;Jeannine Skinner;Janessa O. Carvalho;Guy G. Potter;April Thames

  • Improvement in Memory with Plasticity-Based Adaptive Cognitive Training: Results of the 3-Month Follow-Up

    Elizabeth M. Zelinski;Laila M. Spina;Kristine Yaffe;Ronald Ruff

  • Memory Functioning Questionnaire: Concurrent validity with memory performance and self-reported memory failures.

    Unknown

  • Cognitive benefits of computer games for older adults

    Elizabeth M Zelinski;Ricardo Reyes

  • Mobile Apps for Caregivers of Older Adults: Quantitative Content Analysis.

    Molli R Grossman;Deanah Kim Zak;Elizabeth M Zelinski

  • Sixteen-year longitudinal and time lag changes in memory and cognition in older adults.

    Unknown

  • Adult age differences in multiple cognitive functions: differentiation, dedifferentiation, or process-specific change?

    Elizabeth M. Zelinski;Kayan L. Lewis

  • Adult age differences in reasoning from new information.

    Leah L. Light;Elizabeth M. Zelinski;Martha Moore

  • Social Activity and Cognitive Functioning Over Time: A Coordinated Analysis of Four Longitudinal Studies

    Cassandra L. Brown;Laura E. Gibbons;Robert F. Kennison;Annie Robitaille

  • Cognitively Stimulating Activities: Effects on Cognition across Four Studies with up to 21 Years of Longitudinal Data

    Meghan B. Mitchell;Cynthia R. Cimino;Andreana Benitez;Cassandra L. Brown

  • A 10-item Rasch modeled memory self-efficacy scale

    Unknown

  • Individual differences in 16-year memory changes.

    Elizabeth M. Zelinski;Susan T. Stewart

  • DO MEDICAL CONDITIONS AFFECT COGNITION IN OLDER ADULTS

    Elizabeth M. Zelinski;Eileen Crimmins;Sandra Reynolds;Teresa Seeman

  • Longitudinal hierarchical linear models of the memory functioning questionnaire.

    Christianne J. Lane;Elizabeth M. Zelinski

  • "The Memory Functioning Questionnaire for assessment of memory complaints in adulthood and old age": Correction to Gilewski et al.

    Michael J. Gilewski;Elizabeth M. Zelinski;K. Warner Schaie

Frequent Co-Authors

Scott M. Hofer
Scott M. Hofer University of Victoria
K. Warner Schaie
K. Warner Schaie University of Washington
Andrea M. Piccinin
Andrea M. Piccinin University of Victoria
Glenn E. Smith
Glenn E. Smith University of Florida
Boo Johansson
Boo Johansson University of Gothenburg
Sherry L. Willis
Sherry L. Willis University of Washington
Roger A. Dixon
Roger A. Dixon University of Alberta
Avron Spiro
Avron Spiro Boston University
Leah L. Light
Leah L. Light Pitzer College
Eileen M. Crimmins
Eileen M. Crimmins University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in psychology opens doors to a range of fulfilling careers, both in clinical settings and beyond. Many prospective students are particularly interested in becoming social workers, where educational requirements vary by state. Understanding these requirements is essential if you want to pursue social work as a career pathway.

For example, social worker degree requirements in Utah specify that you will typically need at least a Bachelor’s degree in social work to get started, with a Master’s degree needed for advanced positions. Similarly, the Vermont education requirements for social workers emphasize graduate education for certain roles.

If you’re considering practice in other states, be aware of specific local criteria. For instance, the degree needed to be a social worker in Virginia and the Washington minimum degree requirement for social workers each have their own guidelines for licensure and educational background. Choosing an accredited online psychology program can help meet many of these requirements while offering the flexibility to study from anywhere.

Best Scientists Citing Elizabeth M. Zelinski

Trending Scientists