World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
David F. Hultsch

David F. Hultsch

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
62
Citations
15009
World Ranking
3226
National Ranking
198

David F. Hultsch publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David F. Hultsch sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 113 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David F. Hultsch D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David F. Hultsch sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 62 D-Index — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David F. Hultsch is affiliated with the University of Victoria in Canada. Their academic and research career is associated specifically with this institution, which provides a base for their scholarly activities and contributions.

There are no recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues listed for David F. Hultsch, and no information is available regarding specific fields or subfields of study that they focus on.

Similarly, no data is available regarding their research topics, awards, or book publications. This lack of available data limits detailed insight into the scope and impact of their academic work.

Without additional information on published works or documented collaborations, it is not possible to detail the scientist's research themes, collaborations, or scholarly influence beyond their primary institutional affiliation.

Best Publications

  • Use it or lose it: Engaged lifestyle as a buffer of cognitive decline in aging?

    David F. Hultsch;Christopher Hertzog;Brent J. Small;Roger A. Dixon

  • Variability in Reaction Time Performance of Younger and Older Adults

    David F. Hultsch;Stuart W. S. MacDonald;Roger A. Dixon

  • Measurement properties of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in older populations.

    Christopher Hertzog;Judith Van Alstine;Paul D. Usala;David F. Hultsch

  • Intraindividual variability in cognitive performance in older adults: comparison of adults with mild dementia, adults with arthritis, and healthy adults.

    David F. Hultsch;Stuart W. S. MacDonald;Michael A. Hunter;Judi Levy-Bencheton

  • The Metamemory in Adulthood (MIA) questionnaire

    R A Dixon;D F Hultsch;C Hertzog

  • Age Differences in Cognitive Performance in Later Life: Relationships to Self-Reported Health and Activity Life Style

    David F. Hultsch;Mark Hammer;Brent J. Small

  • Metacognition in adulthood and old age.

    Christopher Hertzog;David F. Hultsch

  • Memory Change in the Aged

    David F. Hultsch

  • Relationships between metamemory, memory predictions, and memory task performance in adults.

    Christopher Hertzog;Roger A. Dixon;David F. Hultsch

  • Performance variability is related to change in cognition: evidence from the Victoria Longitudinal Study.

    Stuart W S MacDonald;David F Hultsch;Roger A Dixon

  • Short-term longitudinal change in cognitive performance in later life.

    David F. Hultsch;Christopher Hertzog;Brent J. Small;Leslie McDonald-Miszczak

  • Latent change models of adult cognition: are changes in processing speed and working memory associated with changes in episodic memory?

    Christopher Hertzog;Roger A. Dixon;David F. Hultsch;Stuart W. S. MacDonald

  • Detecting malingering: a survey of experts' practices.

    Daniel J Slick;Jing E Tan;Esther H Strauss;David F Hultsch

  • Inconsistency in reaction time across the life span.

    Benjamin R. Williams;David F. Hultsch;Esther H. Strauss;Michael A. Hunter

  • Neurocognitive markers of cognitive impairment: exploring the roles of speed and inconsistency.

    Roger A. Dixon;Douglas D. Garrett;Tanya L. Lentz;Stuart W. S. MacDonald

  • Stability and Change in Adult Personality Over 6 Years: Findings From the Victoria Longitudinal Study

    Brent J. Small;Christopher Hertzog;David F. Hultsch;Roger A. Dixon

  • How'd They Do It? Malingering Strategies on Symptom Validity Tests

    Jing Ee Tan;Daniel J Slick;Esther Strauss;David F Hultsch

  • Ability correlates of memory performance in adulthood and aging.

    David F. Hultsch;Christopher Hertzog;Roger A. Dixon

  • Structure and Development of Metamemory in Adulthood

    Unknown

  • Age differences in metamemory: resolving the inconsistencies.

    David F. Hultsch;Christopher Hertzog;Roger A. Dixon

  • Adult age differences in direct and indirect tests of memory.

    David F. Hultsch;Michael E. J. Masson;Brent J. Small

Frequent Co-Authors

Roger A. Dixon
Roger A. Dixon University of Alberta
Esther Strauss
Esther Strauss University of Victoria
Michael A. Hunter
Michael A. Hunter University of Victoria
Stuart W. S. MacDonald
Stuart W. S. MacDonald University of Victoria
Christopher Hertzog
Christopher Hertzog Georgia Institute of Technology
Brent J. Small
Brent J. Small University of South Florida
David Bunce
David Bunce University of Leeds
Richard M. Lerner
Richard M. Lerner Tufts University
Holly Tuokko
Holly Tuokko University of Victoria
Anita M. Hubley
Anita M. Hubley University of British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology often leads to discovering related fields and a variety of career paths. One key distinction for students to consider is the difference between psychology and sociology. While both explore human behavior, psychology focuses on the individual mind, whereas sociology examines societal influences and group dynamics.

For those passionate about helping others, online counseling degrees are a popular route. Several universities now offer top-ranked remote and hybrid programs. For instance, you can explore the best counseling degree programs in Baltimore, which feature a blend of clinical skills and research opportunities.

Students interested in studying or practicing in Massachusetts should check out the best counseling program rankings in Boston. These programs can prepare graduates for licensure and specialized counseling roles. If you are based in the west, leading California counseling degree programs are available, offering flexible learning formats suited to busy schedules.

Choosing the right online degree depends on your personal interests and career goals, so explore these varied options to find your ideal path in psychology or related disciplines.

Best Scientists Citing David F. Hultsch

Recently Published Articles