World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 34 10224 9568 718 674 95 4794

Anita M. Hubley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Anita M. Hubley between 1991 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Anita M. Hubley published across 34 years, from 1991 to 2024, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2014. 7 of the 121 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2014. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 1 publication 1996: 5 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 1 publication 2009: 4 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 12 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 6 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 2 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 1 publication
1991 2024

121 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Anita M. Hubley: publications per year, 1991 to 2024
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 1
1993 0
1994 1
1995 1
1996 5
1997 2
1998 2
1999 2
2000 3
2001 4
2002 2
2003 4
2004 3
2005 2
2006 8
2007 3
2008 1
2009 4
2010 2
2011 2
2012 7
2013 2
2014 12
2015 2
2016 4
2017 11
2018 3
2019 6
2020 6
2021 6
2022 2
2023 6
2024 1
Total 121
Download as CSV

Anita M. Hubley publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anita M. Hubley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 91–100 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 95 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713 95
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Anita M. Hubley D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anita M. Hubley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34–35 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671 34
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Anita M. Hubley is affiliated with the University of British Columbia in Canada. The research focus spans fields such as Psychology and Health Professions, with subfields including General Health Professions, Applied Psychology, Epidemiology, Health, and Social Psychology. Their work addresses topics like Homelessness and Social Issues, Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes, Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes, Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism, Behavioral Health and Interventions, Community Health and Development, and Health disparities and outcomes.

Recent publications by Anita M. Hubley include:

  • "The Association of Residential Instability and Hospitalizations among Homeless and Vulnerably Housed Individuals: Results from a Prospective Cohort Study" (2020) published in Journal of Urban Health
  • "Counselors' Attitudes Towards Working With Clients With Substance Use Disorders" (2020) published in The Counseling Psychologist
  • "Understanding subjective quality of life in homeless and vulnerably housed individuals: The role of housing, health, substance use, and social support" (2021) published in SSM - Mental Health
  • "Psychometric Evaluation of the Hope-Action Inventory in Individuals with Substance Use Issues" (2023) published in Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development
  • "Cracks, Gaps, and Holes in Validation Practice as Evidenced From a Validation Synthesis of the English Version of the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale" (2024) published in European Journal of Psychological Assessment

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Anita M. Hubley include Anne Gadermann, Mohammad Ehsanul Karim, Monica Norena, Lara B. Russell, and Stephen W. Hwang.

Alongside, the scholar's work is often published in venues such as Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, Journal of Urban Health, The Counseling Psychologist, SSM - Mental Health, and Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development.

Best Publications

  • Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and the Modified MMSE (3MS): A psychometric comparison and normative data.

    T. N. Tombaugh;I. McDowell;B. Kristjansson;A. M. Hubley

  • Beck Depression Inventory

    Unknown

  • A Dialectic on Validity: Where We Have Been and Where We Are Going

    Anita M. Hubley;Bruno D. Zumbo

  • Health and the quality of life

    Bruno D. Zumbo;Anita Hubley

  • The 60-item Boston Naming Test : Norms for cognitively intact adults aged 25 to 88 years

    Tom N. Tombaugh;Anita M. Hubley

  • Validity and the Consequences of Test Interpretation and Use

    Anita M. Hubley;Bruno D. Zumbo

  • Beck Depression Inventory

    Unknown

  • Prediction of subjective age, desired age, and age satisfaction in older adults: Do some health dimensions contribute more than others?

    Anita M. Hubley;Lara B. Russell

  • The health and housing in transition study: a longitudinal study of the health of homeless and vulnerably housed adults in three Canadian cities.

    Stephen W. Hwang;Stephen W. Hwang;Tim Aubry;Anita Palepu;Susan Farrell

  • The Relationship of Personality Trait Variables to Subjective Age Identity in Older Adults

    Anita M. Hubley;David F. Hultsch

  • Associations between social participation and subjective quality of life for adults with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury

    Alison M. McLean;Tal Jarus;Anita M. Hubley;Lyn Jongbloed

  • Substance use and access to health care and addiction treatment among homeless and vulnerably housed persons in three Canadian cities.

    Anita Palepu;Anne Gadermann;Anita Hubley;Susan Farrell

  • Health and the Quality of Life

    Unknown

  • Health and other aspects of the quality of life of older people

    Anita M. Hubley;Bruno D. Zumbo;Dawn Hemingway

  • DOES WEIGHTING CAPTURE WHAT'S IMPORTANT? REVISITING SUBJECTIVE IMPORTANCE WEIGHTING WITH A QUALITY OF LIFE MEASURE

    Lara B. Russell;Anita M. Hubley;Anita Palepu;Bruno D. Zumbo

  • Subjective Quality of Life Among Individuals who are Homeless: A Review of Current Knowledge

    Anita M. Hubley;Lara B. Russell;Anita Palepu;Stephen W. Hwang

  • Understanding and Investigating Response Processes in Validation Research

    Bruno D. Zumbo;Anita M. Hubley

  • Psychometric characteristics of assessment procedures: An overview.

    Anita M. Hubley;Bruno D. Zumbo

  • Comparability of total score performance on the Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure and a modified Taylor Complex Figure.

    Anita M Hubley;Diane Tremblay

  • Measurement Invariance of the Multidimensional Body-Self Relations Questionnaire: Can We Compare Across Age and Gender?

    Shayna A. Rusticus;Anita M. Hubley

  • Measurement Invariance of the Appearance Schemas Inventory-Revised and the Body Image Quality of Life Inventory across Age and Gender.

    Shayna A. Rusticus;Anita M. Hubley;Bruno D. Zumbo

  • Four studies comparing the Rey-Osterrieth and Taylor complex figures.

    Tom N. Tombaugh;Anita M. Hubley

  • Effects of age on the Rey-Osterrieth and Taylor complex figures: test-retest data using an intentional learning paradigm.

    T. N. Tombaugh;P. Faulkner;A. M. Hubley

Frequent Co-Authors

Bruno D. Zumbo
Bruno D. Zumbo University of British Columbia
Stephen W. Hwang
Stephen W. Hwang University of Toronto
David F. Hultsch
David F. Hultsch University of Victoria
Peter R.E. Crocker
Peter R.E. Crocker University of British Columbia
Catherine M. Sabiston
Catherine M. Sabiston University of Toronto
Alex C. Michalos
Alex C. Michalos University of Northern British Columbia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in psychology offers numerous online degree options for students seeking flexibility and affordability. Many accredited universities in the United States now provide online counseling master’s programs, making it easier for working professionals and distant learners to advance their education.

When considering programs, affordability is a key issue for most students. For example, if you are based in the Northeast, it’s worthwhile to check the cheapest online counseling master's degrees in Philadelphia. Broader options can be found on the list of affordable online counseling master's programs in the US, where you can compare programs nationwide.

If you are located on the West Coast, review the cheapest online counseling master's degrees in the West to find regionally suitable opportunities. Similarly, those in the Midwest can benefit by exploring affordable online counseling programs in Michigan.

Affordable online degrees in counseling and psychology not only reduce the financial burden but also open doors to rewarding careers in mental health, guidance counseling, and therapy. These pathways are ideal for those aiming for meaningful work while maintaining work-life balance.

Best Scientists Citing Anita M. Hubley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles