World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
34
Citations
6514
World Ranking
7520
National Ranking
2528

Robert W. Meredith publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert W. Meredith sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 48 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Robert W. Meredith D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert W. Meredith sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert W. Meredith is affiliated with Montclair State University in the United States. Their research contributions span several intersecting fields, including Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, Earth and Planetary Sciences, and Environmental Science. Subfields of focus include Paleontology, Molecular Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Genetics, and Ecology.

Meredith's work covers multiple scientific topics with a strong emphasis on evolutionary history and genomics. Key research themes include:

  • Evolution and Paleontology Studies
  • Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Paleontology and Evolutionary Biology
  • Genetic diversity and population structure
  • Fish biology, ecology, and behavior
  • Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies

The scientist's recent publications reflect this diverse interest, featuring contributions to both paleogenomic and phylogenetic methods. Select papers include:

  • Paleogenomics illuminates the evolutionary history of the extinct Holocene "horned" crocodile of Madagascar, Voay robustus, 2021, Communications Biology
  • An independent origin of an annual life cycle in a North American killifish species, 2024, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
  • Inferring Phylogenetic Relationships using the Smith-Waterman Algorithm and Hierarchical Clustering, 2022, 2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)
  • Draft assembly and annotation of the Cuban crocodile (Crocodylus rhombifer) genome, 2024, BMC Genomic Data
  • Author Correction: Paleogenomics illuminates the evolutionary history of the extinct Holocene "horned" crocodile of Madagascar, Voay robustus, 2021, Communications Biology

Meredith has frequently collaborated with other researchers in related fields. Frequent co-authors include:

  • Michael A. Russello
  • Evon Hekkala
  • John Gatesy
  • Apurva Narechania
  • M. L. Aardema

Regarding publication venues, Meredith has contributed to multiple journals and conferences, most notably:

  • Communications Biology
  • Biological Journal of the Linnean Society
  • 2022 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data)
  • BMC Genomic Data

Best Publications

  • Impacts of the Cretaceous Terrestrial Revolution and KPg Extinction on Mammal Diversification

    Robert W. Meredith;Jan E. Janečka;John Gatesy;Oliver A. Ryder

  • Comparative genomics reveals insights into avian genome evolution and adaptation.

    Guojie Zhang;Guojie Zhang;Cai Li;Qiye Li;Bo Li

  • Macroevolutionary dynamics and historical biogeography of primate diversification inferred from a species supermatrix

    Mark S. Springer;Robert W Meredith;Robert W Meredith;John Gatesy;Christopher A Emerling

  • A phylogenetic blueprint for a modern whale.

    John Gatesy;Jonathan H. Geisler;Joseph Chang;Carl Buell

  • The evolution of the placenta drives a shift in sexual selection in livebearing fish

    B. J. A. Pollux;R. W. Meredith;M. S. Springer;T. Garland

  • Molecular decay of the tooth gene Enamelin (ENAM) mirrors the loss of enamel in the fossil record of placental mammals.

    Robert W. Meredith;John Gatesy;William J. Murphy;Oliver A. Ryder

  • A Phylogeny and Timescale for Marsupial Evolution Based on Sequences for Five Nuclear Genes

    Robert W. Meredith;Michael Westerman;Judd A. Case;Mark S. Springer

  • Rod Monochromacy and the Coevolution of Cetacean Retinal Opsins

    Robert W. Meredith;John Gatesy;Christopher A. Emerling;Vincent M. York;Vincent M. York

  • The Adequacy of Morphology for Reconstructing the Early History of Placental Mammals

    Mark S. Springer;Angela Burk-Herrick;Robert Meredith;Eduardo Eizirik

  • A phylogeny and timescale for the living genera of kangaroos and kin (Macropodiformes : Marsupialia) based on nuclear DNA sequences

    Robert W. Meredith;Michael Westerman;Mark S. Springer

  • The historical biogeography of Mammalia

    Mark S. Springer;Robert W. Meredith;Jan E. Janecka;William J. Murphy

  • A phylogeny of Diprotodontia (Marsupialia) based on sequences for five nuclear genes

    Robert W. Meredith;Michael Westerman;Mark S. Springer

  • Evidence for a single loss of mineralized teeth in the common avian ancestor

    Robert W. Meredith;Guojie Zhang;Guojie Zhang;M. Thomas P. Gilbert;M. Thomas P. Gilbert;Erich D. Jarvis

  • Convergent evolution of alternative developmental trajectories associated with diapause in African and South American killifish

    Andrew I. Furness;David N. Reznick;Mark S. Springer;Robert W. Meredith

  • A phylogenetic hypothesis for Crocodylus (Crocodylia) based on mitochondrial DNA: evidence for a trans-Atlantic voyage from Africa to the New World.

    Robert W. Meredith;Evon R. Hekkala;George Amato;John Gatesy

  • The origin and biogeographic diversification of fishes in the family Poeciliidae.

    David N. Reznick;Andrew I. Furness;Robert W. Meredith;Mark S. Springer

  • Pseudogenization of the tooth gene enamelysin (MMP20) in the common ancestor of extant baleen whales

    Robert W. Meredith;John Gatesy;Joyce Cheng;Mark S. Springer

  • Phylogenetic relationships of living and recently extinct bandicoots based on nuclear and mitochondrial DNA sequences

    M. Westerman;Benjamin P. Kear;Benjamin P. Kear;K. Aplin;R. W. Meredith

  • Technical Comment on “The Placental Mammal Ancestor and the Post–K-Pg Radiation of Placentals”

    Mark S. Springer;Robert W. Meredith;Emma C. Teeling;William J. Murphy

  • Spectral shifts of mammalian ultraviolet-sensitive pigments (short wavelength-sensitive opsin 1) are associated with eye length and photic niche evolution.

    Christopher A. Emerling;Hieu T. Huynh;Minh A. Nguyen;Minh A. Nguyen;Robert W. Meredith

  • Resolution of a concatenation/coalescence kerfuffle: partitioned coalescence support and a robust family-level tree for Mammalia.

    John Gatesy;Robert W. Meredith;Jan E. Janecka;Mark P. Simmons

  • Interordinal gene capture, the phylogenetic position of Steller's sea cow based on molecular and morphological data, and the macroevolutionary history of Sirenia.

    Mark S. Springer;Anthony V. Signore;Johanna L.A. Paijmans;Jorge Vélez-Juarbe

Frequent Co-Authors

Mark S. Springer
Mark S. Springer University of California, Riverside
John Gatesy
John Gatesy American Museum of Natural History
William J. Murphy
William J. Murphy Texas A&M University
David N. Reznick
David N. Reznick University of California, Riverside
Michael Westerman
Michael Westerman La Trobe University
Eduardo Eizirik
Eduardo Eizirik Pontifical Catholic University of Rio Grande do Sul
M. Thomas P. Gilbert
M. Thomas P. Gilbert University of Copenhagen
Oliver A. Ryder
Oliver A. Ryder University of California, San Diego
Guojie Zhang
Guojie Zhang Zhejiang University
Emma C. Teeling
Emma C. Teeling University College Dublin

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Ecology and Evolution opens up many opportunities for interdisciplinary studies and online learning pathways. Today’s students can benefit from flexible options that allow them to build relevant skills and transition into related fields.

Bridge programs can be especially valuable for those looking to make a switch. For example, an SLP bridge pathway for communication sciences graduates helps non-SLP majors transition into speech-language pathology—a model that is increasingly common across the sciences.

Similarly, many healthcare fields offer rapid, online options. Aspiring nurses can explore online accelerated bsn programs for non nurses to quickly earn a nursing degree. Those interested in advanced practice can also investigate how many years does it take to be a nurse practitioner—a career where salary and job outlook vary by region, as shown by current psychiatric nurse practitioner salary by state data.

Interdisciplinary online programs and bridge pathways offer Ecology and Evolution students alternative career routes, emphasizing flexibility, affordability, and adaptability in today’s job market.

Best Scientists Citing Robert W. Meredith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles