World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
G. Sybren de Hoog

G. Sybren de Hoog

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Biology and Biochemistry 76 4996 4614 121 114 254 23546

G. Sybren de Hoog publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by G. Sybren de Hoog between 1999 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. G. Sybren de Hoog published across 23 years, from 1999 to 2021, averaging 10.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 33 publications in 2016. 29 of the 240 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1999 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 33. Peak 33 publications in 2016. 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 7 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 22 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 19 publications 2014: 27 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 33 publications 2017: 12 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 15 publications 2021: 14 publications
1999 2021

240 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
G. Sybren de Hoog: publications per year, 1999 to 2021
Year Publications
1999 1
2000 1
2001 1
2002 1
2003 3
2004 3
2005 1
2006 7
2007 3
2008 4
2009 7
2010 7
2011 22
2012 19
2013 19
2014 27
2015 19
2016 33
2017 12
2018 11
2019 10
2020 15
2021 14
Total 240
Download as CSV

G. Sybren de Hoog publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where G. Sybren de Hoog sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 1,028+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 980. Most scientists, 980, have 127–136 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 247–256 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 413 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 848 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 949 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 840 scientists 207–216 publications: 733 scientists 217–226 publications: 708 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 417 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 196 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 59 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientist 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientist 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 254 publications — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 8
57–66 35
67–76 106
77–86 231
87–96 413
97–106 546
107–116 704
117–126 848
127–136 980
137–146 942
147–156 969
157–166 949
167–176 951
177–186 915
187–196 787
197–206 840
207–216 733
217–226 708
227–236 651
237–246 605
247–256 510 254
257–266 524
267–276 434
277–286 417
287–296 350
297–306 363
307–316 315
317–326 296
327–336 261
337–346 240
347–356 219
357–366 196
367–376 154
377–386 161
387–396 155
397–406 145
407–416 124
417–426 112
427–436 132
437–446 116
447–456 99
457–466 81
467–476 91
477–486 80
487–496 80
497–506 59
507–516 36
517–526 46
527–536 54
537–546 44
547–556 43
557–566 43
567–576 42
577–586 25
587–596 34
597–606 23
607–616 33
617–626 31
627–636 27
637–646 25
647–656 28
657–666 34
667–676 18
677–686 16
687–696 10
697–706 12
707–716 21
717–726 12
727–736 12
737–746 10
747–756 7
757–766 13
767–776 15
777–786 13
787–796 9
797–806 9
807–816 7
817–826 4
827–836 9
837–846 7
847–856 3
857–866 5
867–876 5
877–886 11
887–896 3
897–906 4
907–916 7
917–926 5
927–936 6
937–946 6
947–956 3
957–966 7
967–976 2
977–986 2
987–996 1
997–1,006 5
1,007–1,016 2
1,017–1,026 2
1,027 1
1,028+ 100
Download as CSV

G. Sybren de Hoog D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where G. Sybren de Hoog sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000 1,250
Bar chart with 65 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 167+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,253. Most scientists, 1,253, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76–77 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 316 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 899 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,025 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,149 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,235 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,162 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,130 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,031 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 714 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 71 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40–41 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Biology and Biochemistry scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 19,587 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 80
42–43 183
44–45 316
46–47 504
48–49 718
50–51 899
52–53 1,025
54–55 1,149
56–57 1,235
58–59 1,253
60–61 1,162
62–63 1,130
64–65 1,031
66–67 897
68–69 814
70–71 714
72–73 709
74–75 596
76–77 512 76
78–79 473
80–81 412
82–83 373
84–85 358
86–87 285
88–89 273
90–91 227
92–93 208
94–95 193
96–97 153
98–99 157
100–101 148
102–103 120
104–105 113
106–107 100
108–109 86
110–111 67
112–113 71
114–115 73
116–117 64
118–119 53
120–121 60
122–123 54
124–125 43
126–127 38
128–129 49
130–131 26
132–133 18
134–135 23
136–137 32
138–139 32
140–141 27
142–143 19
144–145 22
146–147 12
148–149 16
150–151 14
152–153 10
154–155 13
156–157 10
158–159 7
160–161 9
162–163 13
164–165 4
166 4
167+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Fungus
  • Botany
  • Bacteria

His primary areas of study are Microbiology, Phylogenetic tree, Botany, Phylogenetics and Zoology. His Microbiology study is mostly concerned with Caspofungin, Posaconazole, Scedosporium boydii, Pseudallescheria and Pseudallescheria boydii. His research in Phylogenetic tree intersects with topics in Sporothrix, Nomenclature Committee and Sporothrix schenckii.

His Botany course of study focuses on Ribosomal DNA and Wallemiomycetes, Ustilaginomycetes, Internal transcribed spacer and Wallemia sebi. The study incorporates disciplines such as Fungus and Pneumonia in addition to Phylogenetics. Many of his research projects under Zoology are closely connected to Epithet with Epithet, tying the diverse disciplines of science together.

His most cited work include:

  • The Ascomycota Tree of Life: A Phylum-wide Phylogeny Clarifies the Origin and Evolution of Fundamental Reproductive and Ecological Traits (462 citations)
  • The Amsterdam Declaration on Fungal Nomenclature (250 citations)
  • Scedosporium apiospermum: changing clinical spectrum of a therapy-refractory opportunist. (228 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Microbiology, Botany, Phylogenetic tree, Internal transcribed spacer and Phylogenetics. G. Sybren de Hoog combines topics linked to Fungus with his work on Microbiology. His Botany research includes themes of Chaetothyriales and Exophiala.

His Internal transcribed spacer study incorporates themes from Nucleic acid amplification technique and Ribosomal DNA. His Phylogenetics research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Evolutionary biology, Zoology, Taxonomy and Species complex. His Posaconazole study combines topics in areas such as Caspofungin and Eumycetoma.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Microbiology (60.14%)
  • Botany (27.03%)
  • Phylogenetic tree (19.59%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Black yeast (16.22%)
  • Genetics (21.62%)
  • Genome (10.81%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His scientific interests lie mostly in Black yeast, Genetics, Genome, Virulence and Evolutionary biology. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Fonsecaea, Chromoblastomycosis, Chaetothyriales and Isolation. His study looks at the relationship between Genetics and topics such as Geophilic, which overlap with Genotype, Outbreak, Trichophyton rubrum and Dermatophyte.

In his study, Phylogenetic tree is strongly linked to Phylogenetics, which falls under the umbrella field of Evolutionary biology. With his scientific publications, his incorporates both Rolling circle replication and Microbiology. G. Sybren de Hoog performs integrative study on Microbiology and Detection limit in his works.

Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Global guideline for the diagnosis and management of rare mould infections: an initiative of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology in cooperation with the International Society for Human and Animal Mycology and the American Society for Microbiology (9 citations)
  • No to Neocosmospora: Phylogenomic and Practical Reasons for Continued Inclusion of the Fusarium solani Species Complex in the Genus Fusarium. (8 citations)
  • Prospective application of melanized fungi for the biofiltration of indoor air in closed bioregenerative systems (8 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Fungus
  • Botany
  • Bacteria

G. Sybren de Hoog mainly focuses on Gene, Genome, Virulence, Genetics and Taxonomy. His Gene rearrangement and Comparative genomics study, which is part of a larger body of work in Gene, is frequently linked to Sequence assembly and Biosynthetic process, bridging the gap between disciplines. His Genome research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Microsporum canis, Trichophyton rubrum and Dermatophyte.

His study in Taxonomy is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Evolutionary biology, Clade, Polyphyly, Fusarium and Species complex. G. Sybren de Hoog has included themes like Infectious disease, Zoology, Genus, Monophyly and Phylogenetics in his Fusarium study.

Best Publications

  • Nuclear ribosomal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region as a universal DNA barcode marker for Fungi

    Conrad L. Schoch;Keith A. Seifert;Sabine Huhndorf;Vincent Robert

  • The Ascomycota Tree of Life: A Phylum-wide Phylogeny Clarifies the Origin and Evolution of Fundamental Reproductive and Ecological Traits

    Conrad L. Schoch;Gi Ho Sung;Francesc López-Giráldez;Jeffrey P. Townsend

  • Toward a Novel Multilocus Phylogenetic Taxonomy for the Dermatophytes.

    G. Sybren de Hoog;Karolina Dukik;Michel Monod;Ann Packeu

  • One fungus, which genes? Development and assessment of universal primers for potential secondary fungal DNA barcodes.

    J.B. Stielow;C.A. Lévesque;K.A. Seifert;W. Meyer

  • The Amsterdam Declaration on Fungal Nomenclature

    David L. Hawksworth;David L. Hawksworth;Pedro W. Crous;Scott A. Redhead;Don R. Reynolds

  • Global guideline for the diagnosis and management of rare mould infections: an initiative of the European Confederation of Medical Mycology in cooperation with the International Society for Human and Animal Mycology and the American Society for Microbiology

    Martin Hoenigl;Jon Salmanton-García;Thomas J. Walsh;Thomas J. Walsh;Marcio Nucci

  • Phylogenetic analysis reveals a high prevalence of Sporothrix brasiliensis in Feline sporotrichosis outbreaks

    Anderson Messias Rodrigues;Marcus de Melo Teixeira;G. Sybren de Hoog;Tânia Maria Pacheco Schubach

  • Fungi growing on aromatic hydrocarbons: biotechnology's unexpected encounter with biohazard?

    Francesc X. Prenafeta-Boldú;Richard Summerbell;G. Sybren de Hoog

  • Naming and outline of Dothideomycetes-2014 including proposals for the protection or suppression of generic names.

    Nalin N. Wijayawardene;Pedro W. Crous;Paul M. Kirk;Paul M. Kirk;David L. Hawksworth;David L. Hawksworth;David L. Hawksworth

  • One Fungus, One Name: Defining the Genus Fusarium in a Scientifically Robust Way That Preserves Longstanding Use

    David M. Geiser;Takayuki Aoki;Charles W. Bacon;Scott E. Baker

  • Species-Specific Antifungal Susceptibility Patterns of Scedosporium and Pseudallescheria Species

    Michaela Lackner;G. Sybren de Hoog;Paul E. Verweij;Mohammad J. Najafzadeh

  • Epidemiology and outcome of Scedosporium prolificans infection, a review of 162 cases.

    Juan Luis Rodriguez-Tudela;Juan Berenguer;Josep Guarro;A. Serda Kantarcioglu

  • Taxonomy and phylogeny of the xerophilic genus Wallemia (Wallemiomycetes and Wallemiales, cl. et ord. nov.)

    Polona Zalar;G. Sybren de Hoog;Hans-Josef Schroers;John Michael Frank

  • Diversity and significance of mold species in Norwegian drinking water.

    Gunhild Hageskal;Ann Kristin Knutsen;Peter Gaustad;G. Sybren de Hoog

  • Molecular taxonomy of Trichophyton mentagrophytes and T. tonsurans

    Y. Gräser;A.F.A. Kuijpers;W. Presber;G.S. De Hoog

  • Aspergillus and aspergilloses in wild and domestic animals: a global health concern with parallels to human disease.

    Seyedmojtaba Seyedmousavi;Seyedmojtaba Seyedmousavi;Seyedmojtaba Seyedmousavi;Jacques Guillot;Pascal Arné;G Sybren de Hoog

  • Phylogeny and taxonomy of Cladosporium-like hyphomycetes, including Davidiella gen. nov., the teleomorph of Cladosporium s. str.

    Uwe Braun;Pedro W. Crous;Frank Dugan;J. Z. (Ewald) Groenewald

  • Proposed nomenclature for Pseudallescheria, Scedosporium and related genera

    Michaela Lackner;G. Sybren de Hoog;Liyue Yang;Leandro Ferreira Moreno

  • Molecular Diagnosis of Pathogenic Sporothrix Species

    Anderson Messias Rodrigues;G. Sybren de Hoog;Zoilo Pires de Camargo

  • Cerebral phaeohyphomycosis--a cure at what lengths?

    Dong Ming Li;Dong Ming Li;G Sybren de Hoog

Frequent Co-Authors

Jacques F. Meis
Jacques F. Meis Canisius-Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis
Mohammad Javad Najafzadeh
Mohammad Javad Najafzadeh Mashhad University of Medical Sciences
Macit Ilkit
Macit Ilkit Cukurova University
Anderson Messias Rodrigues
Anderson Messias Rodrigues Federal University of Sao Paulo
Josep Guarro
Josep Guarro Rovira i Virgili University
Zoilo Pires de Camargo
Zoilo Pires de Camargo Federal University of Sao Paulo
Paul E. Verweij
Paul E. Verweij Radboud University
Michael J. Wingfield
Michael J. Wingfield University of Pretoria
Theo van der Lee
Theo van der Lee Wageningen University & Research
Pedro W. Crous
Pedro W. Crous Utrecht University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA can lead to a wide range of professional opportunities and advanced degrees. Many students transition into various healthcare, research, and clinical fields. If you're considering a healthcare specialization, look into fast track mental health nursing programs, which offer a quicker pathway to become a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner. This is an ideal choice for those interested in mental health care.

Nutrition is a rapidly growing field for science graduates. For those aiming to become a Registered Dietitian, accelerated dietitian programs provide an efficient online option for career advancement. If you're looking to move into leadership roles within healthcare, consider enrolling in one of the cheapest online mba healthcare management programs available.

Those interested in medical coding and billing can pursue certifications like CPC or CCS. Understanding the differences, including cost and salary prospects, is crucial, so exploring cpc vs ccs certification can help you choose the right path as you plan your career after graduation.

Best Scientists Citing G. Sybren de Hoog

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles