World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
43
Citations
8505
World Ranking
7349
National Ranking
3175

Linda M. Ercoli publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda M. Ercoli sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 121 publications — 28th percentile

28% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Linda M. Ercoli D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Linda M. Ercoli sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Linda M. Ercoli is affiliated with the University of California, Los Angeles in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience, with a significant focus on Cognitive Neuroscience and Psychiatry and Mental Health. Additional subfields of study include Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Clinical Psychology.

The scientist's work centers on several main research topics encompassing Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, Mental Health Research Topics, Treatment of Major Depression, Stress Responses and Cortisol, and Sleep and related disorders.

Among recent publications, notable papers include:

  • Sleep quality, neurocognitive performance, and memory self-appraisal in middle-aged and older adults with memory complaints, 2020, published in International Psychogeriatrics
  • A Randomized Controlled Trial of Tai Chi Chih or Health Education for Geriatric Depression, 2021, published in American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
  • Impact of Tai Chi as an adjunct treatment on brain connectivity in geriatric depression, 2022, published in Journal of Affective Disorders
  • Women who breastfeed exhibit cognitive benefits after age 50, 2021, published in Evolution Medicine and Public Health
  • Predictors of Cognitive Improvement Following Treatment for Late-Life Depression, 2020, published in Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology

Frequent coauthors in their research include Helen Lavretsky, Prabha Siddarth, Michaela M. Milillo, Katherine L. Narr, and Beatrix Krause.

Work has often been published in key venues such as International Psychogeriatrics, American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, Journal of Affective Disorders, Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, and Evolution Medicine and Public Health.

Best Publications

  • Localization of Neurofibrillary Tangles and Beta-Amyloid Plaques in the Brains of Living Patients With Alzheimer Disease

    Kooresh Shoghi-Jadid;Gary W. Small;Eric D. Agdeppa;Vladimir Kepe

  • Cerebral metabolic and cognitive decline in persons at genetic risk for Alzheimer's disease

    Gary W. Small;Linda M. Ercoli;Daniel H. S. Silverman;S.-C. Huang

  • PET of Brain Amyloid and Tau in Mild Cognitive Impairment

    Gary W. Small;Vladimir Kepe;Linda M. Ercoli;Prabha Siddarth

  • Memory and Brain Amyloid and Tau Effects of a Bioavailable Form of Curcumin in Non-Demented Adults: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled 18-Month Trial

    Gary W. Small;Prabha Siddarth;Zhaoping Li;Karen J. Miller

  • Complementary Use of Tai Chi Chih Augments Escitalopram Treatment of Geriatric Depression: A Randomized Controlled Trial

    Helen Lavretsky;Lily L. Alstein;Richard E. Olmstead;Linda M. Ercoli

  • Serotonin 1A receptors in the living brain of Alzheimer's disease patients

    Vladimir Kepe;Jorge R. Barrio;Sung Cheng Huang;Linda Ercoli

  • PET Scanning of Brain Tau in Retired National Football League Players: Preliminary Findings

    Gary W. Small;Gary W. Small;Vladimir Kepe;Prabha Siddarth;Prabha Siddarth;Linda M. Ercoli;Linda M. Ercoli

  • Effects of a 14-day healthy longevity lifestyle program on cognition and brain function.

    Gary W. Small;Gary W. Small;Daniel H.S. Silverman;Prabha Siddarth;Linda M. Ercoli

  • Brain network local interconnectivity loss in aging APOE-4 allele carriers

    Jesse A. Brown;Kevin H. Terashima;Alison C. Burggren;Linda M. Ercoli

  • Clinical and neuropsychological comparison of psychotic depression with nonpsychotic depression and schizophrenia.

    Dilip V. Jeste;Shelley C. Heaton;Jane S. Paulsen;Linda Ercoli

  • Citalopram, Methylphenidate, or Their Combination in Geriatric Depression: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial

    Helen Lavretsky;Michelle Reinlieb;Natalie St. Cyr;Prabha Siddarth

  • Changes in Neural Connectivity and Memory Following a Yoga Intervention for Older Adults: A Pilot Study

    Harris A. Eyre;Harris A. Eyre;Bianca Acevedo;Hongyu Yang;Prabha Siddarth

  • Estrogen use and brain metabolic change in postmenopausal women

    Natalie L. Rasgon;Daniel Silverman;Prabha Siddarth;Karen Miller

  • Plaque and tangle imaging and cognition in normal aging and Alzheimer's disease

    Meredith N. Braskie;Meredith N. Braskie;Andrea D. Klunder;Kiralee M. Hayashi;Hillary Protas

  • A randomized controlled trial of Kundalini yoga in mild cognitive impairment

    Harris A. Eyre;Prabha Siddarth;Bianca Acevedo;Kathleen Van Dyk

  • The University of California at Los Angeles Alzheimer's and Dementia Care program for comprehensive, coordinated, patient-centered care: preliminary data.

    David B. Reuben;Leslie Chang Evertson;Neil S. Wenger;Katherine Serrano

  • Cognitive rehabilitation group intervention for breast cancer survivors: results of a randomized clinical trial

    L. M. Ercoli;L. M. Ercoli;L. Petersen;A. M. Hunter;A. M. Hunter;S. A. Castellon;S. A. Castellon

  • Depression and anxiety symptoms are associated with cerebral FDDNP-PET binding in middle-aged and older nondemented adults.

    Helen Lavretsky;Prabha Siddarth;Vladimir Kepe;Linda M. Ercoli

  • Longitudinal changes in medial temporal cortical thickness in normal subjects with the APOE-4 polymorphism.

    Markus Donix;Alison C. Burggren;Nanthia A. Suthana;Prabha Siddarth

  • Modifiable Risk Factors for Alzheimer Disease and Subjective Memory Impairment across Age Groups

    Stephen T. Chen;Prabha Siddarth;Linda M. Ercoli;David A. Merrill

Frequent Co-Authors

Gary W. Small
Gary W. Small University of California, Los Angeles
Prabha Siddarth
Prabha Siddarth University of California, Los Angeles
Susan Y. Bookheimer
Susan Y. Bookheimer University of California, Los Angeles
Jorge R. Barrio
Jorge R. Barrio University of California, Los Angeles
Michael E. Phelps
Michael E. Phelps University of California, Los Angeles
Sung-Cheng Huang
Sung-Cheng Huang University of California, Los Angeles
Katherine L. Narr
Katherine L. Narr University of California, Los Angeles
Daniel H.S. Silverman
Daniel H.S. Silverman University of California, Los Angeles
Paul M. Thompson
Paul M. Thompson University of Southern California
Nanthia Suthana
Nanthia Suthana University of California, Los Angeles

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a degree in neuroscience opens many doors for careers in healthcare, research, technology, and more. If you are looking for flexibility, you may want to explore an accelerated online bachelor's degree. These programs let you complete your studies faster, helping you to start your career or pursue further education more quickly.

Neuroscience is closely linked to some of the top degrees in the world in terms of career potential. Professions in neuroscience often require critical thinking and research skills, which are highly valued in today’s job market. When considering your options, it’s also helpful to review the most lucrative majors to plan a financially rewarding future.

Many students opt for online colleges that offer financial aid. This support helps make higher education more affordable while allowing for flexible learning at your own pace. Combining online study with financial aid can be a smart path to launching your neuroscience career with less debt.

Best Scientists Citing Linda M. Ercoli

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles