World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 45 2836 2576 1358 1219 77 11889

Edwin R. Smith publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Edwin R. Smith between 1995 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Edwin R. Smith published across 27 years, from 1995 to 2021, averaging 3 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 2020. 13 of the 81 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 2020. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 0 publications 2003: 0 publications 2004: 0 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 7 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 4 publications
1995 2021

81 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Edwin R. Smith: publications per year, 1995 to 2021
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 3
1999 0
2000 2
2001 3
2002 0
2003 0
2004 0
2005 3
2006 1
2007 3
2008 3
2009 2
2010 4
2011 7
2012 6
2013 5
2014 2
2015 4
2016 2
2017 6
2018 7
2019 4
2020 9
2021 4
Total 81
Download as CSV

Edwin R. Smith publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin R. Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 77–86 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 77 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90 77
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Edwin R. Smith D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Edwin R. Smith sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44–45 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36
42–43 101
44–45 115 45
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Edwin R. Smith is affiliated with Northwestern University in the United States and has an extensive publication record within the field of Medicine, with a specialized focus on Nephrology. Their research encompasses multiple intersecting areas including Molecular Biology, Surgery, Genetics, and Hematology.

The scientist has contributed to the advancement of knowledge in key topics such as Parathyroid Disorders and Treatments, Dialysis and Renal Disease Management, Pancreatitis Pathology and Treatment, Iron Metabolism and Disorders, Magnesium in Health and Disease, Alkaline Phosphatase Research Studies, and Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes.

Recent publications by Edwin R. Smith include:

  • A Randomized Trial on the Effect of Phosphate Reduction on Vascular End Points in CKD (2020), Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • Interventions To Attenuate Vascular Calcification Progression in Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials (2022), Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • Mud in the blood: the role of protein-mineral complexes and extracellular vesicles in biomineralisation and calcification (2020), Journal of Structural Biology
  • A Metabolic Reprogramming of Glycolysis and Glutamine Metabolism Is a Requisite for Renal Fibrogenesis-Why and How? (2021), Frontiers in Physiology
  • Calciprotein particles: mineral behaving badly? (2020), Current Opinion in Nephrology & Hypertension

Edwin R. Smith often collaborates with several coauthors across their projects. Frequent coauthors include:

  • Tim D. Hewitson
  • S. Holt
  • Nigel D. Toussaint
  • Andreas Pasch
  • Daniel Cejka

The scholar's work is predominantly published in established journals such as:

  • Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • Kidney International Reports
  • Kidney International
  • BMC Nephrology
  • Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation

In addition to journal articles, Edwin R. Smith has contributed to book publications. One known contribution is to a volume published by Springer Science+Business Media titled Kidney Research (2023).

Best Publications

  • Covalent modifications of histones during development and disease pathogenesis.

    Sukesh R Bhaumik;Edwin Smith;Ali Shilatifard

  • Physical Association and Coordinate Function of the H3 K4 Methyltransferase MLL1 and the H4 K16 Acetyltransferase MOF

    Yali Dou;Thomas A. Milne;Thomas A. Milne;Alan J. Tackett;Edwin R. Smith

  • The language of histone crosstalk.

    Jung Shin Lee;Edwin Smith;Ali Shilatifard

  • AFF4, a Component of the ELL/P-TEFb Elongation Complex and a Shared Subunit of MLL Chimeras, Can Link Transcription Elongation to Leukemia

    Chengqi Lin;Edwin R. Smith;Hidehisa Takahashi;Ka Chun Lai

  • Global analysis of H3K4 methylation defines MLL family member targets and points to a role for MLL1-mediated H3K4 methylation in the regulation of transcriptional initiation by RNA polymerase II.

    Pengfei Wang;Chengqi Lin;Edwin R. Smith;Hong Guo

  • The drosophila MSL complex acetylates histone H4 at lysine 16, a chromatin modification linked to dosage compensation.

    Edwin R. Smith;Edwin R. Smith;Antonio Pannuti;Weigang Gu;Arnd Steurnagel

  • ESA1 is a histone acetyltransferase that is essential for growth in yeast

    E. R. Smith;A. Eisen;Weigang Gu;M. Sattah

  • The MLL3/MLL4 Branches of the COMPASS Family Function as Major Histone H3K4 Monomethylases at Enhancers

    Deqing Hu;Xin Gao;Marc A. Morgan;Hans Martin Herz

  • Human Mediator Subunit Med26 Functions As A Docking Site For Transcription Elongation Factors

    Hidehisa Takahashi;Tari J. Parmely;Shigeo Sato;Chieri Tomomori-Sato

  • The super elongation complex (SEC) and MLL in development and disease.

    Edwin Smith;Chengqi Lin;Ali Shilatifard

  • A Human Protein Complex Homologous to the Drosophila MSL Complex Is Responsible for the Majority of Histone H4 Acetylation at Lysine 16

    Edwin R. Smith;Christelle Cayrou;Rong Huang;William S. Lane

  • Born to run: control of transcription elongation by RNA polymerase II

    Fei Xavier Chen;Edwin R. Smith;Ali Shilatifard

  • Enhancer biology and enhanceropathies

    Edwin Smith;Ali Shilatifard

  • Involvement of human MOF in ATM function

    Arun Gupta;Girdhar G. Sharma;Charles S H Young;Manjula Agarwal

  • The Chromatin Signaling Pathway: Diverse Mechanisms of Recruitment of Histone-Modifying Enzymes and Varied Biological Outcomes

    Edwin Smith;Ali Shilatifard

  • PAF1, a Molecular Regulator of Promoter-Proximal Pausing by RNA Polymerase II.

    Fei Xavier Chen;Ashley R. Woodfin;Alessandro Gardini;Ryan A. Rickels

  • The COMPASS family of H3K4 methylases in Drosophila

    Man Mohan;Hans Martin Herz;Edwin R. Smith;Ying Zhang

  • Linking global histone acetylation to the transcription enhancement of X-chromosomal genes in Drosophila males.

    Edwin R. Smith;Edwin R. Smith;C. David Allis;John C. Lucchesi

  • Histone H3K4 monomethylation catalyzed by Trr and mammalian COMPASS-like proteins at enhancers is dispensable for development and viability.

    Ryan Rickels;Hans Martin Herz;Christie C. Sze;Kaixiang Cao

  • Characterization of human cyclin-dependent kinase 12 (CDK12) and CDK13 complexes in C-terminal domain phosphorylation, gene transcription, and RNA processing

    Kaiwei Liang;Xin Gao;Joshua M. Gilmore;Laurence Florens

Frequent Co-Authors

Ali Shilatifard
Ali Shilatifard Northwestern University
Michael P. Washburn
Michael P. Washburn University of Kansas
Laurence Florens
Laurence Florens Stowers Institute for Medical Research
Robb Krumlauf
Robb Krumlauf Stowers Institute for Medical Research
Joel C. Eissenberg
Joel C. Eissenberg Saint Louis University
Ramin Shiekhattar
Ramin Shiekhattar University of Miami
Ronald C. Conaway
Ronald C. Conaway The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Joan Weliky Conaway
Joan Weliky Conaway The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
C. David Allis
C. David Allis Rockefeller University
Selene K. Swanson
Selene K. Swanson Stowers Institute for Medical Research

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Molecular Biology opens up a world of possibilities, not just in science, but across diverse fields that value analytical and research skills. If you're exploring flexible learning, there are many online degree options that pair well with or complement a background in molecular biology.

Consider how the problem-solving skills gained through a molecular biology program relate to subjects like mathematics. Completing one of the online math degrees can be a strategic combination for careers in data science or bioinformatics. If you're interested in multidisciplinary work, checking out online interdisciplinary studies tuition costs can help you design a customized educational path tailored to your unique interests, including molecular sciences.

Molecular biology also plays a role in fields such as biotechnology, pharmaceutical design, and even medical illustration. Those with an eye for design could expand their skillset with a graphic design degree online to create scientific visuals or digital content.

Those interested in the intersection of human environments and science might also explore the online architecture degree route, especially for bioengineering or sustainable design. Each of these pathways offers unique career opportunities, demonstrating the broad applicability of molecular biology expertise.

Best Scientists Citing Edwin R. Smith

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles