World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 43 7945 7718 1044 1038 175 8434

Yan Lu publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Yan Lu between 2000 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Yan Lu published across 26 years, from 2000 to 2025, averaging 9.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2023. 37 of the 246 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2000 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2023. 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 21 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 10 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 2 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 8 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 12 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 25 publications 2024: 17 publications 2025: 20 publications
2000 2025

246 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Yan Lu: publications per year, 2000 to 2025
Year Publications
2000 2
2001 3
2002 4
2003 8
2004 21
2005 9
2006 14
2007 10
2008 11
2009 11
2010 5
2011 6
2012 11
2013 12
2014 6
2015 4
2016 2
2017 1
2018 8
2019 9
2020 7
2021 12
2022 8
2023 25
2024 17
2025 20
Total 246
Download as CSV

Yan Lu publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yan Lu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 172–181 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 175 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556 175
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Yan Lu D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yan Lu sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42–43 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 43 D-Index — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821 43
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Yan Lu is affiliated with Microsoft Research Asia (China). Their primary research contributions lie within the field of Computer Science, with a significant focus on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Artificial Intelligence, and Signal Processing.

Their work spans several subfields including Computational Mechanics and Electrical and Electronic Engineering. Yan Lu's research covers a range of advanced topics, notably:

  • Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Speech and Audio Processing
  • Advanced Data Compression Techniques
  • Advanced Image Processing Techniques
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Advanced Image and Video Retrieval Techniques
  • Advanced Vision and Imaging

Yan Lu has contributed to multiple recent papers that demonstrate the diversity of their research interests. Notable publications include:

  • WBC-Net: A white blood cell segmentation network based on UNet++ and ResNet, 2021, Applied Soft Computing
  • Deep Contextual Video Compression, 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Rethinking Minimal Sufficient Representation in Contrastive Learning, 2022, 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
  • Reliable Propagation-Correction Modulation for Video Object Segmentation, 2022, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • MotionGPT: Finetuned LLMs Are General-Purpose Motion Generators, 2024, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence

Their frequent co-authors include Xiulian Peng, Bin Li, Jinglu Wang, Jiahao Li, and Xue Jiang. These collaborations have spanned multiple studies, with each co-author appearing in numerous joint publications.

Yan Lu's research appears regularly in prominent publication venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology
  • IEEE Transactions on Multimedia

Best Publications

  • Relational Knowledge Distillation

    Wonpyo Park;Dongju Kim;Yan Lu;Minsu Cho

  • The sixth visual object tracking VOT2018 challenge results

    Matej Kristan;Aleš Leonardis;Jiří Matas;Michael Felsberg

  • Rate-distortion analysis for H.264/AVC video coding and its application to rate control

    S. Ma;Wen Gao;Yan Lu

  • Interactive virtual display system for ubiquitous devices

    Yan Lu;Wen Sun;Shipeng Li

  • MonoGRNet: A Geometric Reasoning Network for Monocular 3D Object Localization

    Zengyi Qin;Jinglu Wang;Yan Lu

  • Adaptive rate control for H.264

    Zhengguo Li;Wen Gao;Feng Pan;S. W. Ma

  • Joint Source-Channel Rate-Distortion Optimization for H.264 Video Coding Over Error-Prone Networks

    Yuan Zhang;Wen Gao;Yan Lu;Qingming Huang

  • Virtualized Screen: A Third Element for Cloud–Mobile Convergence

    Yan Lu;Shipeng Li;Huifeng Shen

  • Using a proxy server for a mobile browser

    Huifeng Shen;Haicheng Sun;Zhaotai Pan;Yan Lu

  • Distributed Multi-view Video Coding

    Xun Guo;Yan Lu;Feng Wu;Wen Gao

  • Free Viewpoint Switching in Multi-view Video Streaming Using Wyner-Ziv Video Coding

    Xun Guo;Yan Lu;Feng Wu;Wen Gao

  • Triangulation Learning Network: From Monocular to Stereo 3D Object Detection

    Zengyi Qin;Jinglu Wang;Yan Lu

  • Multi-view video coding based on temporal and view decomposition

    Feng Wu;Shipeng Li;Wenxian Yang;Yan Lu

  • Affinity Derivation and Graph Merge for Instance Segmentation

    Yiding Liu;Siyu Yang;Bin Li;Wengang Zhou

  • Remote computing platforms providing high-fidelity display and interactivity for clients

    Yan Lu;Huifeng Shen;Feng Wu;Shipeng Li

  • Deep Contextual Video Compression

    Jiahao Li;Bin Li;Yan Lu

  • Weakly-supervised Temporal Action Localization by Uncertainty Modeling.

    Pilhyeon Lee;Jinglu Wang;Yan Lu;Hyeran Byun

  • Inter-View Direct Mode for Multiview Video Coding

    Xun Guo;Yan Lu;Feng Wu;Wen Gao

  • Rate control for JVT video coding scheme with HRD considerations

    Siwei Ma;Wen Gao;Feng Wu;Yan Lu

  • Home Cloud with Virtualized Input and Output Roaming over Network

    Hsiao-Wuen Hon;Shipeng Li;Yan Lu;Huifeng Shen

Frequent Co-Authors

Shipeng Li
Shipeng Li Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen
Feng Wu
Feng Wu University of Science and Technology of China
Wen Gao
Wen Gao Peking University
Siwei Ma
Siwei Ma Peking University
Debin Zhao
Debin Zhao Harbin Institute of Technology
Xiangyang Ji
Xiangyang Ji Tsinghua University
Houqiang Li
Houqiang Li University of Science and Technology of China
Qingming Huang
Qingming Huang University of Chinese Academy of Sciences
Xu Jizheng
Xu Jizheng ByteDance
Chang Wen Chen
Chang Wen Chen Hong Kong Polytechnic University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a computer science education opens doors to many interdisciplinary career tracks and online study options. For those interested in environmental sustainability, an environmental science degree can pair well with computer science skills to tackle global challenges like climate modeling or smart agriculture.

If you’re looking for a flexible and fast route into the tech workforce, you may want to consider a 2-year computer science degree online. These accelerated programs are ideal for those who wish to build job-ready skills quickly without compromising on quality.

Engineering also offers exciting pathways. An online environmental engineering degree prepares graduates to create innovative solutions for sustainability issues, while a background in computing enhances their technical toolkit.

Finally, understanding the mechanical engineering cost of education is crucial for students comparing different STEM fields. Many affordable online programs now allow you to balance educational investment with future earning potential in high-demand industries.

Best Scientists Citing Yan Lu

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles