World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
30
Citations
3220
World Ranking
11400
National Ranking
648

David Rawlings publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Rawlings sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 58 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

David Rawlings D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Rawlings sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Rawlings is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. The available data does not specify individual research topics, recent papers, or fields of study associated with this scientist, nor does it provide information about frequent co-authors or publication venues.

There is no record of book publications or awards linked to David Rawlings at this time. The profile focuses solely on the affiliation, with no additional details regarding their academic contributions or scientific impact available for review.

Best Publications

  • Screening for borderline personality disorder in outpatient youth.

    Andrew M Chanen;Martina Jovev;Danica Djaja;Emma McDougall

  • Relating Schizotypy and Personality to the Phenomenology of Creativity

    B Nelson;D Rawlings

  • Music Preference and the Five-Factor Model of the NEO Personality Inventory:

    David Rawlings;Vera Ciancarelli

  • The BPQ: a scale for the assessment of borderline personality based on DSM-IV criteria

    Amir M Poreh;David Rawlings;Gordon Claridge;Justin L Freeman

  • NEO Five-Factor Inventory Scores: Psychometric Properties in a Community Sample

    Greg Murray;David Rawlings;Nicholas B. Allen;John Trinder

  • Personality and aesthetic preference in Spain and England: two studies relating sensation seeking and openness to experience to liking for paintings and music

    David Rawlings;Neus Barrantes i Vidal;Adrian Furnham

  • Taxometric analysis supports a dimensional latent structure for schizotypy

    David Rawlings;Ben Williams;Nick Haslam;Gordon Claridge

  • Dimensional schizotypy, autism, and unusual word associations in artists and scientists

    David Rawlings;Ann Locarnini

  • You Don't See What I See: Individual Differences in the Perception of Meaning from Visual Stimuli

    Timea R. Partos;Simon J. Cropper;David Rawlings

  • Principal components analysis of the Schizotypal Personality Scale (STA) and the Borderline Personality Scale (STB)

    David Rawlings;Gordon Claridge;Justin L Freeman

  • Breaking ground in cross-cultural research on the fear of being laughed at (gelotophobia): A multi-national study involving 73 countries

    Rene T. Proyer;Willibald Ruch;Numan S. Ali;Hmoud S. Al-Olimat

  • Convergence between GNAT‐assessed implicit and explicit personality

    Jennifer M. Boldero;David Rawlings;Nick Haslam

  • Schizotypy and hemisphere function: III. Performance asymmetries on tasks of letter recognition and local–global processing.

    David Rawlings;Gordon Claridge

  • Personality correlates of liking for 'unpleasant' paintings and photographs

    David Rawlings

  • Its Own Reward: A Phenomenological Study of Artistic Creativity

    David Rawlings;Barnaby Nelson

  • Agreeableness and neuroticism as predictors of relapse after first-episode psychosis: a prospective follow-up study

    John F Gleeson;David Rawlings;Henry J Jackson;Patrick D McGorry

  • A questionnaire for the measurement of paranoia/suspiciousness

    David Rawlings;Justin L. Freeman

  • A multidimensional schizotypal traits questionnaire for young adolescents

    David Rawlings;Colleen MacFarlane

  • Correlating a measure of sustained attention with a multi-dimensional measure of schizotypal traits

    David Rawlings;Michelle Goldberg

  • Psychoticism, creativity and dichotic shadowing

    Unknown

  • Extraversion, venturesomeness and intelligence in children

    David Rawlings;Marisa Skok

Frequent Co-Authors

Gordon Claridge
Gordon Claridge University of Oxford
Henry J. Jackson
Henry J. Jackson University of Melbourne
Patrick D. McGorry
Patrick D. McGorry University of Melbourne
John Gleeson
John Gleeson Australian Catholic University
Barnaby Nelson
Barnaby Nelson University of Melbourne
Nick Haslam
Nick Haslam University of Melbourne
Nicholas B. Allen
Nicholas B. Allen University of Oregon
Greg Murray
Greg Murray Swinburne University of Technology
Willibald Ruch
Willibald Ruch University of Zurich
Sharon Dawe
Sharon Dawe Griffith University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a degree in Psychology opens the door to a variety of career paths, both online and in-person. A popular and growing field is Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA), which prepares graduates to become Board Certified Behavior Analysts (BCBAs). The pathway to certification often includes earning a relevant graduate degree, obtaining supervised experience, and passing the certification exam.

Requirements can vary by location. For example, the specific steps for becoming a bcba in Seattle may differ from the Spokane bcba education requirements. Similarly, aspiring BCBAs should familiarize themselves with the St. Louis bcba requirements and understand the process for how to become a bcba in St. Petersburg.

Many accredited universities in the USA now offer flexible, online psychology and ABA programs that meet certification criteria. These pathways allow students to complete coursework remotely, making it easier to balance work and studies. Whether you are pursuing clinical work, research, or educational roles, online degrees can provide the necessary credentials to advance your career in psychology or behavioral analysis.

Best Scientists Citing David Rawlings

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles