World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering

D-Index
38
Citations
4876
World Ranking
2306
National Ranking
171

Ken Badcock publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ken Badcock sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 659+

This scientist: 214 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

Ken Badcock D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ken Badcock sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ken Badcock is affiliated with the University of Liverpool in the United Kingdom. Their academic profile reflects involvement in research activities, although no specific recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues are currently listed.

There are no recorded publications in books or documented awards associated with this researcher. Similarly, there is no available data outlining their primary fields, subfields of study, or main topics of work.

This profile provides a straightforward overview based on the current available information, emphasizing institutional affiliation without additional bibliometric or topical content.

Best Publications

  • A framework for CFD analysis of helicopter rotors in hover and forward flight

    R. Steijl;G. Barakos;G. Barakos;K. Badcock

  • Interval model updating with irreducible uncertainty using the Kriging predictor

    Hamed Haddad Khodaparast;John E. Mottershead;Kenneth J. Badcock

  • Elements of computational fluid dynamics on block structured grids using implicit solvers

    K.J. Badcock;B.E. Richards;M.A. Woodgate

  • Investigation of Three-Dimensional Dynamic Stall Using Computational Fluid Dynamics

    Agis Spentzos;George N. Barakos;Ken J. Badcock;Bryan E. Richards

  • Driving Mechanisms of High-Speed Unsteady Spiked Body Flows, Part 2: Oscillation Mode

    Daniel Feszty;Ken J. Badcock;Bryan E. Richards

  • Non-linear aeroelastic prediction for aircraft applications

    M. J. de C. Henshaw;K. J. Badcock;G. A. Vio;C. B. Allen

  • Linear Frequency Domain and Harmonic Balance Predictions of Dynamic Derivatives

    A. Da Ronch;A. J. McCracken;K. J. Badcock;M. Widhalm

  • Evaluation of Dynamic Derivatives Using Computational Fluid Dynamics

    A. Da Ronch;D. Vallespin;M. Ghoreyshi;K. J. Badcock

  • On the generation of flight dynamics aerodynamic tables by computational fluid dynamics

    A. Da Ronch;M. Ghoreyshi;K.J. Badcock

  • Implicit Harmonic Balance Solver for Transonic Flow with Forced Motions

    M. A. Woodgate;K. J. Badcock

  • Comparison of Adaptive Sampling Methods for Generation of Surrogate Aerodynamic Models

    T. J. Mackman;C. B. Allen;M. Ghoreyshi;K. J. Badcock

  • A data exchange method for fluid-structure interaction problems

    G. S. L. Goura;K. J. Badcock;M. A. Woodgate;B. E. Richards

  • Solution of the Unsteady Euler Equations Using an Implicit Dual-Time Method

    L. Dubuc;F. Cantariti;M. Woodgate;B. Gribben

  • Accelerating the Numerical Generation of Aerodynamic Models for Flight Simulation

    M. Ghoreyshi;K. J. Badcock;M. A. Woodgate

  • Numerical Study of Shock-Reflection Hysteresis in an Underexpanded Jet

    B. J. Gribben;K. J. Badcock;B. E. Richards

  • Transonic aeroelastic simulation for instability searches and uncertainty analysis

    K.J. Badcock;S. Timme;S. Marques;H. Khodaparast

  • Propagation of structural uncertainty to linear aeroelastic stability

    Hamed Haddad Khodaparast;John E. Mottershead;Kenneth J. Badcock

  • A grid deformation technique for unsteady flow computations

    L. Dubuc;F. Cantariti;M. Woodgate;B. Gribben

  • Development of CFD Capability for Full Helicopter Engineering Analysis

    G. Barakos;R. Steijl;K.J. Badcock;A. Brocklehurst

  • Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of Three-Dimensional Dynamic Stall of Various Planform Shapes

    Agis Spentzos;George N. Barakos;Kenneth J. Badcock;Bryan E. Richards

  • Lessons Learned from Numerical Simulations of the F-16XL Aircraft at Flight Conditions

    Arthur Rizzi;Adam Jirásek;John E. Lamar;Simone Crippa

Frequent Co-Authors

George N. Barakos
George N. Barakos University of Glasgow
John E. Mottershead
John E. Mottershead University of Liverpool
Jonathan E. Cooper
Jonathan E. Cooper University of Bristol
Rafael Palacios
Rafael Palacios Imperial College London
Russell M. Cummings
Russell M. Cummings United States Air Force Academy
Markus Raffel
Markus Raffel German Aerospace Center
Ning Qin
Ning Qin University of Sheffield
Ismet Gursul
Ismet Gursul University of Bath
Philip S. Beran
Philip S. Beran United States Air Force Research Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can broaden your career opportunities beyond Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. For example, accelerated options like the 5 year speech pathology programs offer a fast track to specialized fields, which might complement engineering disciplines with healthcare technology applications.

Cost is always a vital consideration when selecting an online degree. Understanding the cost of online speech pathology degree programs can help you budget effectively and evaluate the value proposition of related educational paths.

Military veterans looking to transition into civilian careers will find tailored resources and support in online programs designed specifically for them. The online speech pathology degree for military veterans highlights one such pathway where veterans can leverage their unique skills in emerging technical sectors.

Diverse careers such as becoming an FBI profiler also intersect with engineering principles, emphasizing analytical and technical expertise. Reviewing the FBI profiler salary offers insight into the financial prospects of such roles that value rigorous scientific training.

Best Scientists Citing Ken Badcock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles