World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering 38 2306 2149 171 154 214 4876

Ken Badcock publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ken Badcock between 1992 and 2018, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ken Badcock published across 27 years, from 1992 to 2018, averaging 7.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2005. 2 of the 214 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2018. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2005. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 1 publication 1995: 0 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 7 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 24 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 18 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 15 publications 2010: 20 publications 2011: 21 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication
1992 2018

214 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ken Badcock: publications per year, 1992 to 2018
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 0
1994 1
1995 0
1996 4
1997 1
1998 3
1999 8
2000 12
2001 7
2002 8
2003 9
2004 10
2005 24
2006 11
2007 18
2008 6
2009 15
2010 20
2011 21
2012 10
2013 11
2014 4
2015 4
2016 4
2017 1
2018 1
Total 214
Download as CSV

Ken Badcock publication distribution in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ken Badcock sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 63 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 659+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 155. Most scientists, 155, have 147–156 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 207–216 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 10 scientists 57–66 publications: 23 scientists 67–76 publications: 32 scientists 77–86 publications: 62 scientists 87–96 publications: 67 scientists 97–106 publications: 91 scientists 107–116 publications: 113 scientists 117–126 publications: 115 scientists 127–136 publications: 130 scientists 137–146 publications: 140 scientists 147–156 publications: 155 scientists 157–166 publications: 132 scientists 167–176 publications: 133 scientists 177–186 publications: 130 scientists 187–196 publications: 140 scientists 197–206 publications: 115 scientists 207–216 publications: 125 scientists 217–226 publications: 117 scientists 227–236 publications: 99 scientists 237–246 publications: 92 scientists 247–256 publications: 100 scientists 257–266 publications: 95 scientists 267–276 publications: 88 scientists 277–286 publications: 77 scientists 287–296 publications: 74 scientists 297–306 publications: 74 scientists 307–316 publications: 62 scientists 317–326 publications: 70 scientists 327–336 publications: 59 scientists 337–346 publications: 58 scientists 347–356 publications: 45 scientists 357–366 publications: 44 scientists 367–376 publications: 36 scientists 377–386 publications: 41 scientists 387–396 publications: 32 scientists 397–406 publications: 23 scientists 407–416 publications: 28 scientists 417–426 publications: 27 scientists 427–436 publications: 25 scientists 437–446 publications: 23 scientists 447–456 publications: 23 scientists 457–466 publications: 20 scientists 467–476 publications: 12 scientists 477–486 publications: 24 scientists 487–496 publications: 18 scientists 497–506 publications: 12 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 21 scientists 527–536 publications: 12 scientists 537–546 publications: 8 scientists 547–556 publications: 16 scientists 557–566 publications: 3 scientists 567–576 publications: 11 scientists 577–586 publications: 6 scientists 587–596 publications: 5 scientists 597–606 publications: 6 scientists 607–616 publications: 7 scientists 617–626 publications: 7 scientists 627–636 publications: 10 scientists 637–646 publications: 4 scientists 647–656 publications: 3 scientists 657–658 publications: 2 scientists 659+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 659+

This scientist: 214 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 659 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 10
57–66 23
67–76 32
77–86 62
87–96 67
97–106 91
107–116 113
117–126 115
127–136 130
137–146 140
147–156 155
157–166 132
167–176 133
177–186 130
187–196 140
197–206 115
207–216 125 214
217–226 117
227–236 99
237–246 92
247–256 100
257–266 95
267–276 88
277–286 77
287–296 74
297–306 74
307–316 62
317–326 70
327–336 59
337–346 58
347–356 45
357–366 44
367–376 36
377–386 41
387–396 32
397–406 23
407–416 28
417–426 27
427–436 25
437–446 23
447–456 23
457–466 20
467–476 12
477–486 24
487–496 18
497–506 12
507–516 13
517–526 21
527–536 12
537–546 8
547–556 16
557–566 3
567–576 11
577–586 6
587–596 5
597–606 6
607–616 7
617–626 7
627–636 10
637–646 4
647–656 3
657–658 2
659+ 100
Download as CSV

Ken Badcock D-index placement in Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ken Badcock sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 93+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 83 scientists 31 D-Index: 113 scientists 32 D-Index: 144 scientists 33 D-Index: 153 scientists 34 D-Index: 189 scientists 35 D-Index: 158 scientists 36 D-Index: 139 scientists 37 D-Index: 127 scientists 38 D-Index: 130 scientists 39 D-Index: 126 scientists 40 D-Index: 104 scientists 41 D-Index: 100 scientists 42 D-Index: 107 scientists 43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44 D-Index: 103 scientists 45 D-Index: 79 scientists 46 D-Index: 88 scientists 47 D-Index: 70 scientists 48 D-Index: 83 scientists 49 D-Index: 44 scientists 50 D-Index: 64 scientists 51 D-Index: 56 scientists 52 D-Index: 50 scientists 53 D-Index: 48 scientists 54 D-Index: 58 scientists 55 D-Index: 52 scientists 56 D-Index: 48 scientists 57 D-Index: 42 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 37 scientists 61 D-Index: 42 scientists 62 D-Index: 44 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 33 scientists 65 D-Index: 29 scientists 66 D-Index: 23 scientists 67 D-Index: 29 scientists 68 D-Index: 24 scientists 69 D-Index: 19 scientists 70 D-Index: 34 scientists 71 D-Index: 26 scientists 72 D-Index: 19 scientists 73 D-Index: 18 scientists 74 D-Index: 19 scientists 75 D-Index: 14 scientists 76 D-Index: 19 scientists 77 D-Index: 8 scientists 78 D-Index: 18 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 17 scientists 82 D-Index: 11 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 7 scientists 85 D-Index: 9 scientists 86 D-Index: 8 scientists 87 D-Index: 6 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 10 scientists 91 D-Index: 4 scientists 92 D-Index: 4 scientists 93+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 93+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 93 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,445 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 83
31 113
32 144
33 153
34 189
35 158
36 139
37 127
38 130 38
39 126
40 104
41 100
42 107
43 101
44 103
45 79
46 88
47 70
48 83
49 44
50 64
51 56
52 50
53 48
54 58
55 52
56 48
57 42
58 34
59 42
60 37
61 42
62 44
63 22
64 33
65 29
66 23
67 29
68 24
69 19
70 34
71 26
72 19
73 18
74 19
75 14
76 19
77 8
78 18
79 16
80 12
81 17
82 11
83 16
84 7
85 9
86 8
87 6
88 6
89 7
90 10
91 4
92 4
93+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Ken Badcock is affiliated with the University of Liverpool in the United Kingdom. Their academic profile reflects involvement in research activities, although no specific recent papers, co-authors, or publication venues are currently listed.

There are no recorded publications in books or documented awards associated with this researcher. Similarly, there is no available data outlining their primary fields, subfields of study, or main topics of work.

This profile provides a straightforward overview based on the current available information, emphasizing institutional affiliation without additional bibliometric or topical content.

Best Publications

  • A framework for CFD analysis of helicopter rotors in hover and forward flight

    R. Steijl;G. Barakos;G. Barakos;K. Badcock

  • Interval model updating with irreducible uncertainty using the Kriging predictor

    Hamed Haddad Khodaparast;John E. Mottershead;Kenneth J. Badcock

  • Elements of computational fluid dynamics on block structured grids using implicit solvers

    K.J. Badcock;B.E. Richards;M.A. Woodgate

  • Investigation of Three-Dimensional Dynamic Stall Using Computational Fluid Dynamics

    Agis Spentzos;George N. Barakos;Ken J. Badcock;Bryan E. Richards

  • Driving Mechanisms of High-Speed Unsteady Spiked Body Flows, Part 2: Oscillation Mode

    Daniel Feszty;Ken J. Badcock;Bryan E. Richards

  • Non-linear aeroelastic prediction for aircraft applications

    M. J. de C. Henshaw;K. J. Badcock;G. A. Vio;C. B. Allen

  • Linear Frequency Domain and Harmonic Balance Predictions of Dynamic Derivatives

    A. Da Ronch;A. J. McCracken;K. J. Badcock;M. Widhalm

  • Evaluation of Dynamic Derivatives Using Computational Fluid Dynamics

    A. Da Ronch;D. Vallespin;M. Ghoreyshi;K. J. Badcock

  • On the generation of flight dynamics aerodynamic tables by computational fluid dynamics

    A. Da Ronch;M. Ghoreyshi;K.J. Badcock

  • Implicit Harmonic Balance Solver for Transonic Flow with Forced Motions

    M. A. Woodgate;K. J. Badcock

  • Comparison of Adaptive Sampling Methods for Generation of Surrogate Aerodynamic Models

    T. J. Mackman;C. B. Allen;M. Ghoreyshi;K. J. Badcock

  • A data exchange method for fluid-structure interaction problems

    G. S. L. Goura;K. J. Badcock;M. A. Woodgate;B. E. Richards

  • Solution of the Unsteady Euler Equations Using an Implicit Dual-Time Method

    L. Dubuc;F. Cantariti;M. Woodgate;B. Gribben

  • Accelerating the Numerical Generation of Aerodynamic Models for Flight Simulation

    M. Ghoreyshi;K. J. Badcock;M. A. Woodgate

  • Numerical Study of Shock-Reflection Hysteresis in an Underexpanded Jet

    B. J. Gribben;K. J. Badcock;B. E. Richards

  • Transonic aeroelastic simulation for instability searches and uncertainty analysis

    K.J. Badcock;S. Timme;S. Marques;H. Khodaparast

  • Propagation of structural uncertainty to linear aeroelastic stability

    Hamed Haddad Khodaparast;John E. Mottershead;Kenneth J. Badcock

  • A grid deformation technique for unsteady flow computations

    L. Dubuc;F. Cantariti;M. Woodgate;B. Gribben

  • Development of CFD Capability for Full Helicopter Engineering Analysis

    G. Barakos;R. Steijl;K.J. Badcock;A. Brocklehurst

  • Computational Fluid Dynamics Study of Three-Dimensional Dynamic Stall of Various Planform Shapes

    Agis Spentzos;George N. Barakos;Kenneth J. Badcock;Bryan E. Richards

  • Lessons Learned from Numerical Simulations of the F-16XL Aircraft at Flight Conditions

    Arthur Rizzi;Adam Jirásek;John E. Lamar;Simone Crippa

Frequent Co-Authors

George N. Barakos
George N. Barakos University of Glasgow
John E. Mottershead
John E. Mottershead University of Liverpool
Jonathan E. Cooper
Jonathan E. Cooper University of Bristol
Rafael Palacios
Rafael Palacios Imperial College London
Russell M. Cummings
Russell M. Cummings United States Air Force Academy
Markus Raffel
Markus Raffel German Aerospace Center
Ning Qin
Ning Qin University of Sheffield
Ismet Gursul
Ismet Gursul University of Bath
Philip S. Beran
Philip S. Beran United States Air Force Research Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can broaden your career opportunities beyond Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering. For example, accelerated options like the 5 year speech pathology programs offer a fast track to specialized fields, which might complement engineering disciplines with healthcare technology applications.

Cost is always a vital consideration when selecting an online degree. Understanding the cost of online speech pathology degree programs can help you budget effectively and evaluate the value proposition of related educational paths.

Military veterans looking to transition into civilian careers will find tailored resources and support in online programs designed specifically for them. The online speech pathology degree for military veterans highlights one such pathway where veterans can leverage their unique skills in emerging technical sectors.

Diverse careers such as becoming an FBI profiler also intersect with engineering principles, emphasizing analytical and technical expertise. Reviewing the FBI profiler salary offers insight into the financial prospects of such roles that value rigorous scientific training.

Best Scientists Citing Ken Badcock

Trending Scientists