D-Index & Metrics Best Publications

D-Index & Metrics D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines.

Discipline name D-index D-index (Discipline H-index) only includes papers and citation values for an examined discipline in contrast to General H-index which accounts for publications across all disciplines. Citations Publications World Ranking National Ranking
Social Sciences and Humanities D-index 32 Citations 4,301 130 World Ranking 5404 National Ranking 2662

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Linguistics
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Epistemology

His primary scientific interests are in Linguistics, Noun, Language acquisition, Syntax and Cognitive psychology. His Linguistics study frequently links to related topics such as Inference. His Noun research integrates issues from Affect and Extension.

His research integrates issues of Morpheme, Plural and Numeral system in his study of Language acquisition. His Syntax research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Word, Bootstrapping, Mass noun and Count noun. His Set study, which is part of a larger body of work in Cognitive psychology, is frequently linked to Mental abacus, bridging the gap between disciplines.

His most cited work include:

  • Accessing the unsaid: the role of scalar alternatives in children's pragmatic inference. (185 citations)
  • Quantity judgments and individuation: evidence that mass nouns count. (175 citations)
  • Inference and exact numerical representation in early language development (119 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

David Barner mainly investigates Linguistics, Noun, Cognitive psychology, Language acquisition and Artificial intelligence. Linguistics is closely attributed to Numeral system in his work. He usually deals with Noun and limits it to topics linked to Inference and Utterance and Sentence.

His work carried out in the field of Cognitive psychology brings together such families of science as Cognitive development, Structure, Word and Perception. His Language acquisition research includes themes of Concept learning, Scalar implicature, Bootstrapping and Pragmatics. His Artificial intelligence research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Contrast and Natural language processing.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Linguistics (48.55%)
  • Noun (24.64%)
  • Cognitive psychology (20.29%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2018-2021)?

  • Successor function (6.52%)
  • Natural language processing (14.49%)
  • Artificial intelligence (17.39%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His main research concerns Successor function, Natural language processing, Artificial intelligence, Cognitive psychology and Successor cardinal. His Successor function study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Analogy, Word and Arithmetic. David Barner has researched Cognitive psychology in several fields, including Pragmatics, Implicature, Language acquisition, Logical consequence and Bootstrapping.

David Barner combines subjects such as Simple, Approximate number system, Wynn, Categorization and Theoretical linguistics with his study of Language acquisition. Semantics is closely connected to Word in his research, which is encompassed under the umbrella topic of Perception. His Inference research includes elements of DUAL, Linguistics, Plural and Series.

Between 2018 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Ontogenetic Origins of Human Integer Representations. (24 citations)
  • Do children's number words begin noisy? (9 citations)
  • Do children use language structure to discover the recursive rules of counting (5 citations)

This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s body of work. If you have any feedback, you can contact us here.

Best Publications

Quantity judgments and individuation: evidence that mass nouns count.

David Barner;Jesses Snedeker.
Cognition (2005)

388 Citations

Accessing the unsaid: the role of scalar alternatives in children's pragmatic inference.

David Barner;Neon Brooks;Alan Bale.
Cognition (2011)

322 Citations

The Interpretation of Functional Heads: Using Comparatives to Explore the Mass/Count Distinction

Alan C. Bale;David Barner.
Journal of Semantics (2009)

205 Citations

Finding one's meaning: a test of the relation between quantifiers and integers in language development.

David Barner;Katherine Chow;Shu-Ju Yang.
Cognitive Psychology (2009)

182 Citations

Inference and exact numerical representation in early language development

David Barner;Asaf Bachrach.
Cognitive Psychology (2010)

169 Citations

Representing Exact Number Visually Using Mental Abacus

Michael C. Frank;David Barner.
Journal of Experimental Psychology: General (2012)

165 Citations

On the relation between the acquisition of singular–plural morpho-syntax and the conceptual distinction between one and more than one

David Barner;Dora Thalwitz;Justin Wood;Shu-Ju Yang.
Developmental Science (2007)

157 Citations

Does learning to count involve a semantic induction

Kathryn Davidson;Kortney Eng;David Barner.
Cognition (2012)

146 Citations

No nouns, no verbs: psycholinguistic arguments in favor of lexical underspecification

David Barner;Alan C. Bale.
Lingua (2002)

126 Citations

Cross-linguistic relations between quantifiers and numerals in language acquisition: evidence from Japanese.

David Barner;Amanda Libenson;Pierina Cheung;Mayu Takasaki;Mayu Takasaki.
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology (2009)

115 Citations

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Contact us

Best Scientists Citing David Barner

Michael C. Frank

Michael C. Frank

Stanford University

Publications: 21

Noah D. Goodman

Noah D. Goodman

Stanford University

Publications: 14

Justin Halberda

Justin Halberda

Johns Hopkins University

Publications: 13

Gail D. Heyman

Gail D. Heyman

University of California, San Diego

Publications: 13

Stephen Crain

Stephen Crain

Macquarie University

Publications: 12

Susan C. Levine

Susan C. Levine

University of Chicago

Publications: 11

Jeffrey Lidz

Jeffrey Lidz

University of Maryland, College Park

Publications: 11

Linda B. Smith

Linda B. Smith

Indiana University

Publications: 10

Lance J. Rips

Lance J. Rips

Northwestern University

Publications: 9

Elizabeth S. Spelke

Elizabeth S. Spelke

Harvard University

Publications: 9

Kang Lee

Kang Lee

University of Toronto

Publications: 9

Susan Carey

Susan Carey

Harvard University

Publications: 9

Marco Zorzi

Marco Zorzi

University of Padua

Publications: 8

Steven Piantadosi

Steven Piantadosi

University of California, Berkeley

Publications: 8

Teresa McCormack

Teresa McCormack

Queen's University Belfast

Publications: 8

Michael Tomasello

Michael Tomasello

Duke University

Publications: 7

Trending Scientists

Amiya Nayak

Amiya Nayak

University of Ottawa

Robert J. Bloomfield

Robert J. Bloomfield

Cornell University

Hendrik Bessembinder

Hendrik Bessembinder

Arizona State University

S. Samar Hasnain

S. Samar Hasnain

University of Liverpool

Dongliang Jiang

Dongliang Jiang

Chinese Academy of Sciences

Peter J. Uggowitzer

Peter J. Uggowitzer

University of Leoben

J. Michael Scott

J. Michael Scott

University of Idaho

Marcos Macari

Marcos Macari

Sao Paulo State University

Brendan Flannery

Brendan Flannery

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Darren R. Gröcke

Darren R. Gröcke

Durham University

Ligy Philip

Ligy Philip

Indian Institute of Technology Madras

Don J. Diamond

Don J. Diamond

City Of Hope National Medical Center

Darryl C. De Vivo

Darryl C. De Vivo

Columbia University

Giuseppe Basso

Giuseppe Basso

University of Padua

Robert A. Vierkant

Robert A. Vierkant

Mayo Clinic

Satish K. Garg

Satish K. Garg

University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus

Something went wrong. Please try again later.