World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
49
Citations
6895
World Ranking
3015
National Ranking
1457

David Barner publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Barner sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 154 publications — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

David Barner D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David Barner sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

David Barner is a researcher affiliated with the University of California, San Diego in the United States. Their work spans several interdisciplinary fields, primarily focusing on psychology and mathematics as well as social sciences. Barner's research includes significant contributions to developmental and educational psychology, statistics and probability, education, language and linguistics, and cognitive neuroscience.

The scientist's research topics concentrate on cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills, child and animal learning development, mathematics education and teaching techniques, reading and literacy development, language development and disorders, syntax, semantics, linguistic variation, and social and intergroup psychology.

Barner has published extensively, with frequent appearances in venues such as Cognition, Child Development, Open Mind, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, and Cognitive Science. The most prolific among these is Cognition, which has featured six of their papers.

Their recent papers include the following:

  • Do children use language structure to discover the recursive rules of counting?, 2020, Cognitive Psychology
  • Children are sensitive to reputation when giving to both ingroup and outgroup members, 2020, Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
  • Counting and the ontogenetic origins of exact equality, 2021, Cognition
  • Assessing the knower-level framework: How reliable is the Give-a-Number task?, 2022, Cognition
  • What Counts? Sources of Knowledge in Children's Acquisition of the Successor Function, 2021, Child Development

David Barner collaborates frequently with several researchers, including Rose M. Schneider, Jessica Sullivan, Dimitrios Skordos, Alan Bale, and Sebastian Holt. Rose M. Schneider and Jessica Sullivan are noted as the most frequent coauthors, each contributing to six joint publications.

Best Publications

  • Accessing the unsaid: the role of scalar alternatives in children's pragmatic inference.

    David Barner;Neon Brooks;Alan Bale

  • Quantity judgments and individuation: evidence that mass nouns count.

    David Barner;Jesses Snedeker

  • Finding one's meaning: a test of the relation between quantifiers and integers in language development.

    David Barner;Katherine Chow;Shu-Ju Yang

  • The Interpretation of Functional Heads: Using Comparatives to Explore the Mass/Count Distinction

    Alan C. Bale;David Barner

  • Does learning to count involve a semantic induction

    Kathryn Davidson;Kortney Eng;David Barner

  • Representing Exact Number Visually Using Mental Abacus

    Michael C. Frank;David Barner

  • Inference and exact numerical representation in early language development

    David Barner;Asaf Bachrach

  • On the relation between the acquisition of singular–plural morpho-syntax and the conceptual distinction between one and more than one

    David Barner;Dora Thalwitz;Justin Wood;Shu-Ju Yang

  • Learning the language of time: Children's acquisition of duration words.

    Katharine A. Tillman;David Barner

  • Grammatical morphology as a source of early number word meanings

    Alhanouf Almoammer;Jessica Sullivan;Chris Donlan;Franc Marušič

  • Ontogenetic Origins of Human Integer Representations.

    Susan Carey;David Barner

  • Cross-linguistic relations between quantifiers and numerals in language acquisition: evidence from Japanese.

    David Barner;Amanda Libenson;Pierina Cheung;Mayu Takasaki;Mayu Takasaki

  • Today is tomorrow's yesterday: Children's acquisition of deictic time words.

    Katharine A. Tillman;Tyler Marghetis;David Barner;Mahesh Srinivasan

  • No nouns, no verbs: psycholinguistic arguments in favor of lexical underspecification

    David Barner;Alan C. Bale

  • Compositionality and statistics in adjective acquisition: 4-year-olds interpret tall and short based on the size distributions of novel noun referents.

    David Barner;Jesse Snedeker

  • Children's Early Understanding of Mass-Count Syntax: Individuation, Lexical Content, and the Number Asymmetry Hypothesis

    David Barner;Jesses Snedeker

  • To infinity and beyond: Children generalize the successor function to all possible numbers years after learning to count.

    Pierina Cheung;Pierina Cheung;Miriam Rubenson;David Barner

  • Slow mapping: color word learning as a gradual inductive process.

    Katie Wagner;Karen Dobkins;David Barner

  • Collaboration promotes proportional reasoning about resource distribution in young children.

    Rowena Ng;Gail D. Heyman;David Barner

  • Language, Thought, and Real Nouns.

    David Barner;Shunji Inagaki;Peggy Li

  • Classifiers as Count Syntax: Individuation and Measurement in the Acquisition of Mandarin Chinese

    Peggy Li;David Barner;Becky H. Huang

  • Inference and Association in Children's Early Numerical Estimation.

    Jessica Sullivan;David Barner

  • Ignorance and Inference: Do Problems with Gricean Epistemic Reasoning Explain Children’s Difficulty with Scalar Implicature?

    Lara Hochstein;Alan C. Bale;Danny Fox;David Barner

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael C. Frank
Michael C. Frank Stanford University
Gail D. Heyman
Gail D. Heyman University of California, San Diego
Jesse Snedeker
Jesse Snedeker Harvard University
Yarrow Dunham
Yarrow Dunham Yale University
Susan Carey
Susan Carey Harvard University
Marc D. Hauser
Marc D. Hauser Harvard University
Karen R. Dobkins
Karen R. Dobkins University of California, San Diego
George A. Alvarez
George A. Alvarez Harvard University
Kang Lee
Kang Lee University of Toronto
Susan Goldin-Meadow
Susan Goldin-Meadow University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to a wide range of rewarding careers. Many students are looking for affordable and flexible options to start their journey. For example, a cheap psychology degree online can be a great entry point for those interested in human behavior, mental health, or counseling.

If you’re considering advanced careers in social work, pursuing an online master's in social work can help you develop the skills needed to support diverse communities. For those wanting to practice as a psychologist, several psyd programs online offer flexible learning paths and practical training opportunities.

Another growing field is marriage and family therapy. Accelerated mft programs online allow you to complete your qualifications faster and start working with clients sooner. As more accredited programs move online, these pathways are becoming increasingly accessible to students worldwide.

Best Scientists Citing David Barner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles