World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
98
Citations
33847
World Ranking
8948
National Ranking
4603

Darryl C. De Vivo publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Darryl C. De Vivo sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 405 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Darryl C. De Vivo D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Darryl C. De Vivo sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2000 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Darryl C. De Vivo is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States, with research focusing predominantly on medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work extensively covers neurogenetic and muscular disorders, congenital anomalies and fetal surgery, as well as RNA modifications and cancer.

Their published body of work includes contributions to key medical and scientific fields, with main research topics highlighting neurogenetic and muscular disorders research, congenital anomalies and fetal surgery, RNA modifications and cancer, diet and metabolism studies, mechanical circulatory support devices, family and disability support research, and metabolism and genetic disorders.

Darryl C. De Vivo has authored numerous papers in prominent venues, including:

  • Glut1 Deficiency Syndrome (Glut1DS): State of the art in 2020 and recommendations of the international Glut1DS study group, 2020, Epilepsia Open
  • Circulating markers of NADH-reductive stress correlate with mitochondrial disease severity, 2021, Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • Treatment of infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy with nusinersen: final report of a phase 2, open-label, multicentre, dose-escalation study, 2021, The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health
  • Continued benefit of nusinersen initiated in the presymptomatic stage of spinal muscular atrophy: 5-year update of the NURTURE study, 2023, Muscle & Nerve
  • Clinical Variability in Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type III, 2020, Annals of Neurology

Their frequent co-authors include Richard S. Finkel, Eugenio Mercuri, Jacqueline Montes, John Day, and Basil T. Darras, demonstrating collaboration across multiple studies in neuromuscular and neurogenetic disorders.

The primary publication venues for Darryl C. De Vivo's work reflect a focus on neuromuscular and neurological conditions:

  • Neurology
  • Neuromuscular Disorders
  • Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
  • Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine

Their research spans key subfields, including genetics, molecular biology, surgery, physiology, and clinical biochemistry, contributing to an interdisciplinary approach in their scientific investigations.

Recognition for their scientific contributions includes being named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2000.

Best Publications

  • Nusinersen versus Sham Control in Infantile-Onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy

    Richard S. Finkel;Eugenio Mercuri;Basil T. Darras;Anne M. Connolly

  • Mitochondrial myopathy, encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and strokelike episodes: a distinctive clinical syndrome.

    Steven G. Pavlakis;Peter C. Phillips;Salvatore DiMauro;Darryl C. De Vivo;Darryl C. De Vivo

  • Nusinersen versus Sham Control in Later-Onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy

    Eugenio Mercuri;Basil T. Darras;Claudia A. Chiriboga;John W. Day

  • Treatment of infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy with nusinersen: a phase 2, open-label, dose-escalation study

    Richard S Finkel;Claudia A Chiriboga;Jiri Vajsar;John W Day

  • Defective glucose transport across the blood-brain barrier as a cause of persistent hypoglycorrhachia, seizures, and developmental delay.

    Darryl C. De Vivo;Rosario R. Trifiletti;Ronald I. Jacobson;Gabriel M. Ronen

  • GLUT1 reductions exacerbate Alzheimer's disease vasculo-neuronal dysfunction and degeneration

    Ethan A Winkler;Ethan A Winkler;Yoichiro Nishida;Yoichiro Nishida;Abhay P Sagare;Sanket V Rege

  • Fatal infantile cardioencephalomyopathy with COX deficiency and mutations in SCO2, a COX assembly gene

    L C Papadopoulou;C M Sue;M M Davidson;K Tanji

  • Results from a phase 1 study of nusinersen (ISIS-SMN(Rx)) in children with spinal muscular atrophy.

    Claudia A. Chiriboga;Kathryn J. Swoboda;Basil T. Darras;Susan T. Iannaccone

  • Observational study of spinal muscular atrophy type I and implications for clinical trials

    Richard S. Finkel;Michael P. McDermott;Petra Kaufmann;Basil T. Darras

  • Nusinersen initiated in infants during the presymptomatic stage of spinal muscular atrophy: Interim efficacy and safety results from the Phase 2 NURTURE study.

    Darryl C. De Vivo;Enrico Bertini;Kathryn J. Swoboda;Wuh-Liang Hwu

  • GLUT-1 deficiency syndrome caused by haploinsufficiency of the blood-brain barrier hexose carrier

    Glen Seidner;Marcela Garcia Alvarez;Jih-I Yeh;Kevin R. O'Driscoll

  • Dichloroacetate causes toxic neuropathy in MELAS: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

    P. Kaufmann;K. Engelstad;Y. Wei;S. Jhung

  • Glut-1 deficiency syndrome: Clinical, genetic, and therapeutic aspects

    Dong Wang;Juan M. Pascual;Hong Yang;Kristin Engelstad

  • Experience with the ketogenic diet in infants.

    Douglas R. Nordli;Maxine M. Kuroda;Joanne Carroll;Dorcas Y. Koenigsberger

  • The changing natural history of spinal muscular atrophy type 1

    M. Oskoui;G. Levy;C. J. Garland;J. M. Gray

  • An expanded version of the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale for SMA II and III patients.

    Jessica M. O’Hagen;Allan M. Glanzman;Michael P. McDermott;Patricia A. Ryan

  • Familial cerebellar ataxia with muscle coenzyme Q10 deficiency.

    O. Musumeci;A. Naini;A. E. Slonim;N. Skavin

  • Genes that Affect Brain Structure and Function Identified by Rare Variant Analyses of Mendelian Neurologic Disease

    Ender Karaca;Tamar Harel;Davut Pehlivan;Shalini N. Jhangiani

  • Primary and secondary carnitine deficiency syndromes.

    Roser Pons;Darryl C. De Vivo

  • Nusinersen in later-onset spinal muscular atrophy: Long-term results from the phase 1/2 studies

    Basil T. Darras;Claudia A. Chiriboga;Susan T. Iannaccone;Kathryn J. Swoboda

Frequent Co-Authors

Salvatore DiMauro
Salvatore DiMauro Columbia University
Richard S. Finkel
Richard S. Finkel St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Eugenio Mercuri
Eugenio Mercuri Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Francesco Muntoni
Francesco Muntoni University College London
Wendy K. Chung
Wendy K. Chung Columbia University
Michael P. McDermott
Michael P. McDermott University of Rochester
Michio Hirano
Michio Hirano Columbia University
Enrico Bertini
Enrico Bertini Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital
Eduardo Bonilla
Eduardo Bonilla Columbia University
Sara Shanske
Sara Shanske Columbia University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The healthcare sector in the USA is evolving, and new career pathways are emerging beyond the traditional MD degree. For students who want to advance their nursing careers, msn to dnp programs online offer a flexible path to leadership roles in clinical practice and nursing administration.

If you are interested in the pharmaceutical field, earning an online pharmacist degree can open doors to careers in pharmacy practice, research, or pharmaceutical industry management. Each year, more accredited institutions are offering this degree with remote study options.

For those who want to work with healthcare data, enrolling in a health information technology online degree can lead to opportunities in medical data management, health analytics, and IT in hospitals.

Finally, healthcare organizations are in need of skilled medical billing and coding professionals. A medical coding certification online delivers essential training for this increasingly in-demand support role.

These alternative online degrees can help you quickly enter or advance within the healthcare industry, even if you decide not to pursue a traditional MD pathway.

Best Scientists Citing Darryl C. De Vivo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles