World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 98 8947 8398 4602 4258 405 33847

Darryl C. De Vivo publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Darryl C. De Vivo between 1972 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Darryl C. De Vivo published across 54 years, from 1972 to 2025, averaging 7.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2019. 19 of the 415 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1972 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2019. 1972: 1 publication 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 1 publication 1979: 0 publications 1980: 1 publication 1981: 1 publication 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 1 publication 1988: 2 publications 1989: 3 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 6 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 4 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 5 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 9 publications 2004: 10 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 12 publications 2010: 16 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 13 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 15 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 20 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 13 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 20 publications 2021: 21 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 14 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 7 publications
1972 2025

415 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Darryl C. De Vivo: publications per year, 1972 to 2025
Year Publications
1972 1
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 1
1979 0
1980 1
1981 1
1982 0
1983 0
1984 2
1985 5
1986 2
1987 1
1988 2
1989 3
1990 5
1991 10
1992 1
1993 6
1994 6
1995 4
1996 5
1997 5
1998 6
1999 11
2000 3
2001 8
2002 11
2003 9
2004 10
2005 5
2006 11
2007 9
2008 11
2009 12
2010 16
2011 10
2012 13
2013 15
2014 15
2015 21
2016 20
2017 15
2018 13
2019 26
2020 20
2021 21
2022 10
2023 14
2024 12
2025 7
Total 415
Download as CSV

Darryl C. De Vivo publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Darryl C. De Vivo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 401–420 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 405 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918 405
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Darryl C. De Vivo D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Darryl C. De Vivo sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 98–99 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 98 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668 98
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2000 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Darryl C. De Vivo is affiliated with Columbia University in the United States, with research focusing predominantly on medicine and biochemistry, genetics, and molecular biology. Their work extensively covers neurogenetic and muscular disorders, congenital anomalies and fetal surgery, as well as RNA modifications and cancer.

Their published body of work includes contributions to key medical and scientific fields, with main research topics highlighting neurogenetic and muscular disorders research, congenital anomalies and fetal surgery, RNA modifications and cancer, diet and metabolism studies, mechanical circulatory support devices, family and disability support research, and metabolism and genetic disorders.

Darryl C. De Vivo has authored numerous papers in prominent venues, including:

  • Glut1 Deficiency Syndrome (Glut1DS): State of the art in 2020 and recommendations of the international Glut1DS study group, 2020, Epilepsia Open
  • Circulating markers of NADH-reductive stress correlate with mitochondrial disease severity, 2021, Journal of Clinical Investigation
  • Treatment of infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy with nusinersen: final report of a phase 2, open-label, multicentre, dose-escalation study, 2021, The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health
  • Continued benefit of nusinersen initiated in the presymptomatic stage of spinal muscular atrophy: 5-year update of the NURTURE study, 2023, Muscle & Nerve
  • Clinical Variability in Spinal Muscular Atrophy Type III, 2020, Annals of Neurology

Their frequent co-authors include Richard S. Finkel, Eugenio Mercuri, Jacqueline Montes, John Day, and Basil T. Darras, demonstrating collaboration across multiple studies in neuromuscular and neurogenetic disorders.

The primary publication venues for Darryl C. De Vivo's work reflect a focus on neuromuscular and neurological conditions:

  • Neurology
  • Neuromuscular Disorders
  • Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
  • Journal of Neuromuscular Diseases
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine

Their research spans key subfields, including genetics, molecular biology, surgery, physiology, and clinical biochemistry, contributing to an interdisciplinary approach in their scientific investigations.

Recognition for their scientific contributions includes being named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2000.

Best Publications

  • Nusinersen versus Sham Control in Infantile-Onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy

    Richard S. Finkel;Eugenio Mercuri;Basil T. Darras;Anne M. Connolly

  • Mitochondrial myopathy, encephalopathy, lactic acidosis, and strokelike episodes: a distinctive clinical syndrome.

    Steven G. Pavlakis;Peter C. Phillips;Salvatore DiMauro;Darryl C. De Vivo;Darryl C. De Vivo

  • Nusinersen versus Sham Control in Later-Onset Spinal Muscular Atrophy

    Eugenio Mercuri;Basil T. Darras;Claudia A. Chiriboga;John W. Day

  • Treatment of infantile-onset spinal muscular atrophy with nusinersen: a phase 2, open-label, dose-escalation study

    Richard S Finkel;Claudia A Chiriboga;Jiri Vajsar;John W Day

  • Defective glucose transport across the blood-brain barrier as a cause of persistent hypoglycorrhachia, seizures, and developmental delay.

    Darryl C. De Vivo;Rosario R. Trifiletti;Ronald I. Jacobson;Gabriel M. Ronen

  • GLUT1 reductions exacerbate Alzheimer's disease vasculo-neuronal dysfunction and degeneration

    Ethan A Winkler;Ethan A Winkler;Yoichiro Nishida;Yoichiro Nishida;Abhay P Sagare;Sanket V Rege

  • Fatal infantile cardioencephalomyopathy with COX deficiency and mutations in SCO2, a COX assembly gene

    L C Papadopoulou;C M Sue;M M Davidson;K Tanji

  • Results from a phase 1 study of nusinersen (ISIS-SMN(Rx)) in children with spinal muscular atrophy.

    Claudia A. Chiriboga;Kathryn J. Swoboda;Basil T. Darras;Susan T. Iannaccone

  • Observational study of spinal muscular atrophy type I and implications for clinical trials

    Richard S. Finkel;Michael P. McDermott;Petra Kaufmann;Basil T. Darras

  • Nusinersen initiated in infants during the presymptomatic stage of spinal muscular atrophy: Interim efficacy and safety results from the Phase 2 NURTURE study.

    Darryl C. De Vivo;Enrico Bertini;Kathryn J. Swoboda;Wuh-Liang Hwu

  • GLUT-1 deficiency syndrome caused by haploinsufficiency of the blood-brain barrier hexose carrier

    Glen Seidner;Marcela Garcia Alvarez;Jih-I Yeh;Kevin R. O'Driscoll

  • Dichloroacetate causes toxic neuropathy in MELAS: a randomized, controlled clinical trial.

    P. Kaufmann;K. Engelstad;Y. Wei;S. Jhung

  • Glut-1 deficiency syndrome: Clinical, genetic, and therapeutic aspects

    Dong Wang;Juan M. Pascual;Hong Yang;Kristin Engelstad

  • Experience with the ketogenic diet in infants.

    Douglas R. Nordli;Maxine M. Kuroda;Joanne Carroll;Dorcas Y. Koenigsberger

  • The changing natural history of spinal muscular atrophy type 1

    M. Oskoui;G. Levy;C. J. Garland;J. M. Gray

  • An expanded version of the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale for SMA II and III patients.

    Jessica M. O’Hagen;Allan M. Glanzman;Michael P. McDermott;Patricia A. Ryan

  • Familial cerebellar ataxia with muscle coenzyme Q10 deficiency.

    O. Musumeci;A. Naini;A. E. Slonim;N. Skavin

  • Genes that Affect Brain Structure and Function Identified by Rare Variant Analyses of Mendelian Neurologic Disease

    Ender Karaca;Tamar Harel;Davut Pehlivan;Shalini N. Jhangiani

  • Primary and secondary carnitine deficiency syndromes.

    Roser Pons;Darryl C. De Vivo

  • Nusinersen in later-onset spinal muscular atrophy: Long-term results from the phase 1/2 studies

    Basil T. Darras;Claudia A. Chiriboga;Susan T. Iannaccone;Kathryn J. Swoboda

Frequent Co-Authors

Salvatore DiMauro
Salvatore DiMauro Columbia University
Richard S. Finkel
Richard S. Finkel St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Eugenio Mercuri
Eugenio Mercuri Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Francesco Muntoni
Francesco Muntoni University College London
Wendy K. Chung
Wendy K. Chung Columbia University
Michael P. McDermott
Michael P. McDermott University of Rochester
Michio Hirano
Michio Hirano Columbia University
Enrico Bertini
Enrico Bertini Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital
Eduardo Bonilla
Eduardo Bonilla Columbia University
Sara Shanske
Sara Shanske Columbia University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The healthcare sector in the USA is evolving, and new career pathways are emerging beyond the traditional MD degree. For students who want to advance their nursing careers, msn to dnp programs online offer a flexible path to leadership roles in clinical practice and nursing administration.

If you are interested in the pharmaceutical field, earning an online pharmacist degree can open doors to careers in pharmacy practice, research, or pharmaceutical industry management. Each year, more accredited institutions are offering this degree with remote study options.

For those who want to work with healthcare data, enrolling in a health information technology online degree can lead to opportunities in medical data management, health analytics, and IT in hospitals.

Finally, healthcare organizations are in need of skilled medical billing and coding professionals. A medical coding certification online delivers essential training for this increasingly in-demand support role.

These alternative online degrees can help you quickly enter or advance within the healthcare industry, even if you decide not to pursue a traditional MD pathway.

Best Scientists Citing Darryl C. De Vivo

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles