World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Materials Science

D-Index
60
Citations
15801
World Ranking
6951
National Ranking
1748

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
60
Citations
15611
World Ranking
2151
National Ranking
681

Daniel J. Friedman publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel J. Friedman sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 348 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Daniel J. Friedman D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel J. Friedman sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2018 - Fellow of American Physical Society (APS) Citation For outstanding contributions in the field of IIIV semiconductor physics and multijunction photovoltaic science and groundbreaking work in the materials physics of ordering in IIIV alloys and optics and device physics for novel structures and record solar conversion efficiencies

Overview

Daniel J. Friedman is affiliated with the National Renewable Energy Laboratory in the United States. Their work focuses on the physics and materials science aspects of semiconductor technologies, particularly in relation to photovoltaic systems. The scientist's contributions relate to understanding and enhancing the properties of III-V semiconductor alloys and the physics underlying multijunction photovoltaic devices.

Friedman's recognized expertise encompasses the materials physics of ordering phenomena in III-V alloys and the optical and device physics associated with novel semiconductor structures. These areas are central to advancing solar conversion efficiency in photovoltaic applications.

In 2018, Daniel J. Friedman was awarded the Fellow of the American Physical Society (APS). The citation for the award highlights outstanding contributions in the field of III-V semiconductor physics and multijunction photovoltaic science, including groundbreaking research into the materials physics of ordering in III-V alloys and the physics of optics and device design for innovative structures and solar conversion efficiency improvements.

Best Publications

  • Band Anticrossing in GaInNAs Alloys

    W. Shan;W. Walukiewicz;J. W. Ager;E. E. Haller

  • 40.8% efficient inverted triple-junction solar cell with two independently metamorphic junctions

    J. F. Geisz;D. J. Friedman;J. S. Ward;A. Duda

  • High-efficiency GaInP∕GaAs∕InGaAs triple-junction solar cells grown inverted with a metamorphic bottom junction

    J. F. Geisz;Sarah Kurtz;M. W. Wanlass;J. S. Ward

  • 1-eV solar cells with GaInNAs active layer

    D.J. Friedman;J.F. Geisz;S.R. Kurtz;J.M. Olson

  • 29.5%‐efficient GaInP/GaAs tandem solar cells

    K. A. Bertness;Sarah R. Kurtz;D. J. Friedman;A. E. Kibbler

  • III-N-V semiconductors for solar photovoltaic applications

    J F Geisz;D J Friedman

  • Nitrogen-Activated Transitions, Level Repulsion, and Band Gap Reduction in GaAs 1-x N x with x < 0.03

    J. D. Perkins;A. Mascarenhas;Yong Zhang;J. F. Geisz

  • Photocurrent of 1 eV GaInNAs lattice-matched to GaAs

    J.F. Geisz;D.J. Friedman;J.M. Olson;S.R. Kurtz

  • Optical enhancement of the open-circuit voltage in high quality GaAs solar cells

    M. A. Steiner;J. F. Geisz;I. García;D. J. Friedman

  • Enhanced external radiative efficiency for 20.8 efficient single-junction GaInP solar cells

    J. F. Geisz;M. A. Steiner;I. García;S. R. Kurtz

  • Structural changes during annealing of GaInAsN

    Sarah Kurtz;J. Webb;L. Gedvilas;D. Friedman

  • Thermophotovoltaic Efficiency of 40

    Alina LaPotin;Kevin L. Schulte;Myles A. Steiner;Kyle Buznitsky

  • Dilute nitride GaInNAs and GaInNAsSb solar cells by molecular beam epitaxy

    David B. Jackrel;Seth Robert Bank;Homan B. Yuen;Mark A. Wistey

  • Effect of nitrogen on the band structure of GaInNAs alloys

    W. Shan;W. Walukiewicz;J. W. Ager;E. E. Haller

  • Progress and challenges for next-generation high-efficiency multijunction solar cells

    D.J. Friedman

  • Multi-junction, monolithic solar cell using low-band-gap materials lattice matched to GaAs or Ge

    Jerry M. Olson;Sarah R. Kurtz;Daniel J. Friedman

  • Building a Six-Junction Inverted Metamorphic Concentrator Solar Cell

    John F. Geisz;Myles A. Steiner;Nikhil Jain;Kevin L. Schulte

  • Band Anticrossing in III-N-V Alloys

    W. Shan;W. Walukiewicz;K.M. Yu;J.W. Ager

  • Application of a novel multiple scattering approach to photoelectron diffraction and Auger electron diffraction

    A.P. Kaduwela;D.J. Friedman;C.S. Fadley

  • Final-state effects in photoelectron diffraction

    D.J. Friedman;C.S. Fadley

Frequent Co-Authors

John F. Geisz
John F. Geisz National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Sarah Kurtz
Sarah Kurtz University of California, Merced
J. M. Olson
J. M. Olson National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Myles A. Steiner
Myles A. Steiner National Renewable Energy Laboratory
Charles S. Fadley
Charles S. Fadley University of California, Davis
I. Lindau
I. Lindau Stanford University
Andrew G. Norman
Andrew G. Norman National Renewable Energy Laboratory
W. E. Spicer
W. E. Spicer Stanford University
Richard R. King
Richard R. King Arizona State University
Mowafak Al-Jassim
Mowafak Al-Jassim National Renewable Energy Laboratory

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're interested in expanding your expertise beyond engineering and technology, a variety of online degrees can help you diversify your skillset and enhance your career prospects. For those aiming to strengthen their communication skills—an essential asset for engineers working in multidisciplinary teams—an online master’s in communication can equip you with advanced techniques in interpersonal, organizational, and technical communication.

Aspiring entrepreneurs or professionals passionate about launching startups may benefit from an mba in entrepreneurship, which covers innovation management, business planning, and venture finance. Alternatively, those seeking a more general business foundation might consider online mba programs no gmat, allowing you to enhance your strategic management and leadership abilities without the added barrier of entrance exams.

For individuals drawn to organizing complex projects or leading cross-functional teams, an online project management degree can provide practical tools and recognized certifications in planning, execution, and oversight. These related degrees open a range of career pathways, supporting both technical and leadership ambitions across today’s technology-driven workplaces.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel J. Friedman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles