What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Astronomy
- Galaxy
- Milky Way
Michael W. Richmond focuses on Astrophysics, Astronomy, Galaxy, Sky and Quasar.
His work focuses on many connections between Astrophysics and other disciplines, such as Cosmic microwave background, that overlap with his field of interest in Dark energy and Cosmology.
His Galaxy study frequently draws connections to other fields, such as CMB cold spot.
The various areas that he examines in his Sky study include Remote sensing and Photometry.
His work deals with themes such as Celestial equator, Open cluster, Astrometry, Astrograph and Photometry, which intersect with Quasar.
Michael W. Richmond works mostly in the field of Supernova, limiting it down to topics relating to Luminosity and, in certain cases, Supernova Legacy Survey.
His most cited work include:
- The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical summary (8500 citations)
- The Seventh Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey (4732 citations)
- Detection of the baryon acoustic peak in the large-scale correlation function of SDSS luminous red galaxies (3620 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Michael W. Richmond mostly deals with Astrophysics, Astronomy, Supernova, Stars and Sky.
Astrophysics is represented through his Galaxy, Light curve, Photometry, Redshift and Quasar research.
His research integrates issues of Brightness, White dwarf and Ejecta in his study of Photometry.
His Supernova study also includes
- Cosmic microwave background and related Dark energy,
- Distance modulus that connect with fields like Photometry.
Michael W. Richmond interconnects Photosphere, Halo and Observatory in the investigation of issues within Stars.
When carried out as part of a general Sky research project, his work on Celestial equator and Data release is frequently linked to work in Amateur and Imaging data, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of study.
He most often published in these fields:
- Astrophysics (88.73%)
- Astronomy (50.98%)
- Supernova (30.88%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2014-2021)?
- Astrophysics (88.73%)
- Galaxy (26.96%)
- Astronomy (50.98%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Michael W. Richmond spends much of his time researching Astrophysics, Galaxy, Astronomy, Active galactic nucleus and Accretion disc.
His Redshift, Orbital period and Accretion study in the realm of Astrophysics connects with subjects such as Torus and Maxima.
His study in Redshift is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Quasar and Emission spectrum.
His Galaxy research incorporates themes from Light curve, Supernova and Sigma.
His Accretion disc research integrates issues from Variable star, Precession and Dwarf nova.
The Galaxy merger study combines topics in areas such as Doubly ionized oxygen and Sky.
Between 2014 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Repetitive patterns in rapid optical variations in the nearby black-hole binary V404 Cygni (77 citations)
- The Data Release of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey-II Supernova Survey (74 citations)
- Survey of period variations of superhumps in SU UMa-type dwarf novae. VII. The seventh year (2014-2015) (48 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Astronomy
- Milky Way
- Galaxy
His primary scientific interests are in Astrophysics, Astronomy, Galaxy, Period and Accretion disc.
His work on Accretion as part of general Astrophysics research is frequently linked to Torus, bridging the gap between disciplines.
The study incorporates disciplines such as Light curve and Supernova in addition to Galaxy.
His Light curve study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Redshift, Celestial equator, Stellar population, Star formation and Photometry.
His Supernova research incorporates themes from Spectroscopy, Baryon, Spectral line, Stellar mass and Sigma.
Michael W. Richmond interconnects Variable star and Precession in the investigation of issues within Accretion disc.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
