World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
78
Citations
21677
World Ranking
4543
National Ranking
2210

Chris Kintner publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris Kintner sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 125 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Chris Kintner D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Chris Kintner sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1988 - Fellow of Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Overview

Chris Kintner is affiliated with the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in the United States. Their research spans several fields including Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology, as well as Agricultural and Biological Sciences. The scientist's work also covers subfields such as Cell Biology, Plant Science, Mechanical Engineering, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Kintner's research topics include:

  • Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Plant Molecular Biology Research
  • Chromosomal and Genetic Variations
  • Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Advanced Materials and Mechanics
  • Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatments

The scientist has published papers in notable venues such as Science Advances, Cells and Development, and Heart Rhythm. Notable recent papers include:

  • "Emi2 enables centriole amplification during multiciliated cell differentiation," published in 2022 in Science Advances
  • "Mechanical strain breaks planar symmetry in embryonic epithelia via polarized microtubules," published in 2022 in Cells and Development
  • "PO-07-219 HEMOLYSIS AFTER ATRIAL FIBRILLATION ABLATION USING TWO PULSED FIELD ABLATION SYSTEMS," published in 2025 in Heart Rhythm

Kintner has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Seongjae Kim
  • Yuan-Hung Chien
  • Amy L. Ryan
  • Dingxin Qin
  • E. Kevin Heist

In 1988, Kintner was recognized as a Fellow of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation.

Best Publications

  • Identification of neurogenin, a Vertebrate Neuronal Determination Gene

    Qiufu Ma;Chris Kintner;David J Anderson

  • Primary neurogenesis in Xenopus embryos regulated by a homologue of the Drosophila neurogenic gene Delta.

    Ajay Chitnis;Domingos Henrique;Julian Lewis;David Ish-Horowicz

  • Overexpression of cadherins and underexpression of β-catenin inhibit dorsal mesoderm induction in early Xenopus embryos

    Janet Heasman;Aaron Crawford;Kim Goldstone;Peggy Garner-Hamrick

  • Dll4, a novel Notch ligand expressed in arterial endothelium

    John R. Shutter;Sheila Scully;Wei Fan;William G. Richards

  • A histone deacetylase corepressor complex regulates the Notch signal transduction pathway

    Hung Ying Kao;Peter Ordentlich;Peter Ordentlich;Peter Ordentlich;Naoko Koyano-Nakagawa;Zhenyu Tang;Zhenyu Tang

  • Expression of Xenopus N-CAM RNA in ectoderm is an early response to neural induction.

    C.R. Kintner;D.A. Melton

  • Regulation of embryonic cell adhesion by the cadherin cytoplasmic domain

    Chris Kintner

  • Mastermind mediates chromatin-specific transcription and turnover of the Notch enhancer complex

    Christy J. Fryer;Elise Lamar;Ivana Turbachova;Chris Kintner

  • Dishevelled controls apical docking and planar polarization of basal bodies in ciliated epithelial cells.

    Tae Joo Park;Brian J Mitchell;Philip B Abitua;Chris Kintner

  • Expression of an extracellular deletion of Xotch diverts cell fate in Xenopus embryos

    Clark R. Coffman;Clark R. Coffman;Paul Skoglund;William A. Harris;Chris R. Kintner

  • The Xenopus homolog of Drosophila Suppressor of Hairless mediates Notch signaling during primary neurogenesis

    Daniel A. Wettstein;David L. Turner;Chris Kintner

  • Drosophila neuralized is a ubiquitin ligase that promotes the internalization and degradation of delta.

    Eric C. Lai;Gisèle A. Deblandre;Chris Kintner;Gerald M. Rubin

  • Monoclonal antibodies identify blastemal cells derived from dedifferentiating muscle in newt limb regeneration

    Chris R. Kintner;Jeremy P. Brockes

  • Xotch, the Xenopus homolog of Drosophila notch

    Clark Coffman;William Harris;Chris Kintner

  • The divergent DSL ligand Dll3 does not activate Notch signaling but cell autonomously attenuates signaling induced by other DSL ligands.

    Ena Ladi;James T. Nichols;Weihong Ge;Alison Miyamoto

  • The forkhead protein Foxj1 specifies node-like cilia in Xenopus and zebrafish embryos

    Jennifer L Stubbs;Isao Oishi;Juan Carlos Izpisúa Belmonte;Chris Kintner

  • An essential role for retinoid signaling in anteroposterior neural patterning

    B. Blumberg;J. Bolado;T.A. Moreno;C. Kintner

  • The effects of N-cadherin misexpression on morphogenesis in xenopus embryos

    R.Jennifer Detrick;David Dickey;Chris R. Kintner

  • Cloning of a second type of activin receptor and functional characterization in Xenopus embryos.

    Lawrence S. Mathews;Wylie W. Vale;Chris R. Kintner

  • Multicilin promotes centriole assembly and ciliogenesis during multiciliate cell differentiation

    J. L. Stubbs;E. K. Vladar;J. D. Axelrod;C. Kintner

Frequent Co-Authors

Nancy Papalopulu
Nancy Papalopulu University of Manchester
Bill Sugden
Bill Sugden University of Wisconsin–Madison
Martyn Goulding
Martyn Goulding Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Ronald M. Evans
Ronald M. Evans Salk Institute for Biological Studies
Heymut Omran
Heymut Omran University of Münster
Ajay B. Chitnis
Ajay B. Chitnis National Institutes of Health
William A. Harris
William A. Harris University of Cambridge
Heike Olbrich
Heike Olbrich University Hospital Münster
Jeffrey D. Axelrod
Jeffrey D. Axelrod Stanford University
Jeremy P. Brockes
Jeremy P. Brockes University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

A background in Biology or Biochemistry provides a strong foundation for various healthcare careers beyond traditional lab work. One fast-growing field is medical coding and health information management. These roles are critical in ensuring accurate patient records and insurance billing.

If you're considering these career pathways, it’s helpful to understand the difference between certified coding specialist and other medical coding certifications. Certification can impact both job prospects and potential salary. Medical coding roles offer flexible job environments, and you can learn more about the typical medical coding jobs salary to see if this career fits your goals.

Like any career, there are benefits and challenges. Those wondering, "is medical coding a good career?" can explore the pros and cons before making a decision.

For those seeking a flexible education option, many universities offer online degrees such as a bachelor's degree health information management. This pathway merges science, technology, and management for versatile healthcare careers.

Best Scientists Citing Chris Kintner

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles