World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Immunology 46 4588 4247 2068 1896 81 10711

Carla Oseroff publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Carla Oseroff between 1991 and 2017, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Carla Oseroff published across 27 years, from 1991 to 2017, averaging 3 papers a year. Output peaked at 8 publications in 2013. 10 of the 81 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1991 to 2017. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 8. Peak 8 publications in 2013. 1991: 1 publication 1992: 2 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 2 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 0 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 0 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 0 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 5 publications
1991 2017

81 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Carla Oseroff: publications per year, 1991 to 2017
Year Publications
1991 1
1992 2
1993 5
1994 5
1995 1
1996 1
1997 2
1998 2
1999 4
2000 1
2001 1
2002 1
2003 1
2004 0
2005 3
2006 0
2007 7
2008 7
2009 5
2010 3
2011 0
2012 4
2013 8
2014 2
2015 5
2016 5
2017 5
Total 81
Download as CSV

Carla Oseroff publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carla Oseroff sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 76 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 62–71 to 807+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 189. Most scientists, 189, have 152–161 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 72–81 publications, is where this scientist sits. 62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 69 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientist 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62–71 publications 807+

This scientist: 81 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
62–71 9
72–81 23 81
82–91 40
92–101 72
102–111 86
112–121 108
122–131 150
132–141 160
142–151 159
152–161 189
162–171 166
172–181 181
182–191 188
192–201 187
202–211 178
212–221 158
222–231 168
232–241 159
242–251 160
252–261 148
262–271 116
272–281 125
282–291 115
292–301 111
302–311 95
312–321 97
322–331 97
332–341 99
342–351 96
352–361 69
362–371 76
372–381 71
382–391 71
392–401 62
402–411 54
412–421 41
422–431 63
432–441 53
442–451 31
452–461 42
462–471 40
472–481 29
482–491 34
492–501 30
502–511 23
512–521 41
522–531 29
532–541 28
542–551 16
552–561 18
562–571 18
572–581 17
582–591 17
592–601 17
602–611 19
612–621 13
622–631 12
632–641 11
642–651 16
652–661 9
662–671 5
672–681 13
682–691 12
692–701 6
702–711 6
712–721 9
722–731 9
732–741 6
742–751 11
752–761 10
762–771 7
772–781 12
782–791 7
792–801 5
802–806 1
807+ 100
Download as CSV

Carla Oseroff D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carla Oseroff sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 157+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 201. Most scientists, 201, have 58–59 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 163 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Immunology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,929 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 28
42–43 91
44–45 157
46–47 192 46
48–49 175
50–51 188
52–53 177
54–55 155
56–57 194
58–59 201
60–61 197
62–63 201
64–65 173
66–67 167
68–69 172
70–71 199
72–73 184
74–75 133
76–77 163
78–79 127
80–81 121
82–83 125
84–85 121
86–87 102
88–89 96
90–91 75
92–93 72
94–95 74
96–97 66
98–99 68
100–101 49
102–103 60
104–105 54
106–107 36
108–109 23
110–111 52
112–113 41
114–115 34
116–117 25
118–119 28
120–121 11
122–123 20
124–125 27
126–127 19
128–129 20
130–131 16
132–133 17
134–135 14
136–137 15
138–139 9
140–141 11
142–143 9
144–145 9
146–147 7
148–149 7
150–151 7
152–153 5
154–155 8
156 6
157+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Carla Oseroff is affiliated with the La Jolla Institute For Allergy & Immunology in the United States. Their professional work focuses on the field of immunology and allergy research within this institution.

No specific information is available regarding Carla Oseroff's recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues. Additionally, there is no recorded data on book publications, main fields or subfields of study, or main research topics associated with their work.

There is also no documented information about awards won or distinctions received by Carla Oseroff.

The lack of detailed publication and research topic data suggests that further public records or indexed databases may provide additional insights into their specific contributions to their field. However, based on the available information, Carla Oseroff's affiliation places them in a research environment known for contributions to allergy and immunology studies in the United States.

Best Publications

  • The relationship between class I binding affinity and immunogenicity of potential cytotoxic T cell epitopes.

    A. Sette;A. Vitiello;B. Reherman;P. Fowler

  • T cells from patients with Parkinson’s disease recognize α-synuclein peptides

    David Sulzer;Roy N. Alcalay;Francesca Garretti;Lucien Cote

  • Development of high potency universal DR-restricted helper epitopes by modification of high affinity DR-blocking peptides

    Jeff Alexander;John Sidney;Scott Southwood;Jörg Ruppert

  • Human CTL epitopes encoded by human papillomavirus type 16 E6 and E7 identified through in vivo and in vitro immunogenicity studies of HLA-A*0201-binding peptides.

    M. E. Ressing;A. Sette;R. M. P. Brandt;J. Ruppert

  • Drug hypersensitivity caused by alteration of the MHC-presented self-peptide repertoire

    David A. Ostrov;Barry J. Grant;Yuri A. Pompeu;John Sidney

  • Pre-existing immunity against swine-origin H1N1 influenza viruses in the general human population.

    Jason A. Greenbaum;Maya F. Kotturi;Yohan Kim;Carla Oseroff

  • Structural requirements for binding of an immunodominant myelin basic protein peptide to DR2 isotypes and for its recognition by human T cell clones

    K W Wucherpfennig;A Sette;S Southwood;C Oseroff

  • On the interaction of promiscuous antigenic peptides with different DR alleles. Identification of common structural motifs.

    D O'Sullivan;T Arrhenius;J Sidney;M F Del Guercio

  • Binding of myelin basic protein peptides to human histocompatibility leukocyte antigen class II molecules and their recognition by T cells from multiple sclerosis patients.

    A Valli;A Sette;L Kappos;C Oseroff

  • Utilization of MHC class I transgenic mice for development of minigene DNA vaccines encoding multiple HLA-restricted CTL epitopes.

    Ishioka Gy;Fikes J;Hermanson G;Livingston B

  • Immunomic Analysis of the Repertoire of T-Cell Specificities for Influenza A Virus in Humans

    Erika Assarsson;Huynh-Hoa Bui;John Sidney;Qing Zhang

  • Human memory CTL response specific for influenza A virus is broad and multispecific

    Carmen Gianfrani;Carla Oseroff;John Sidney;Robert W Chesnut

  • Functional consequences of engagement of the T cell receptor by low affinity ligands.

    J Alexander;K Snoke;J Ruppert;J Sidney

  • A Quantitative Analysis of the Variables Affecting the Repertoire of T Cell Specificities Recognized after Vaccinia Virus Infection

    Erika Assarsson;John Sidney;Carla Oseroff;Valerie Pasquetto

  • Measurement of MHC/peptide interactions by gel filtration.

    John Sidney;Scott Southwood;Carla Oseroff;Marie-France del Guercio

  • HLA DR4w4-binding motifs illustrate the biochemical basis of degeneracy and specificity in peptide-DR interactions.

    A. Sette;J. Sidney;C. Oseroff;M.-F. Del Guercio

  • Analysis of cytotoxic T cell responses to dominant and subdominant epitopes during acute and chronic lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus infection.

    R G van der Most;A Sette;C Oseroff;J Alexander

  • Kinetic analysis of a complete poxvirus transcriptome reveals an immediate-early class of genes

    Erika Assarsson;Jason A. Greenbaum;Magnus Sundström;Lana Schaffer

  • Identification of Db- and Kb-Restricted Subdominant Cytotoxic T-Cell Responses in Lymphocytic Choriomeningitis Virus-Infected Mice

    R G van der Most;K Murali-Krishna;J L Whitton;C Oseroff

  • Development and validation of a broad scheme for prediction of HLA class II restricted T cell epitopes.

    Sinu Paul;Cecilia S. Lindestam Arlehamn;Thomas J. Scriba;Myles B.C. Dillon

  • Altered Helper T Lymphocyte Function Associated with Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection and its Role in Response to Therapeutic Vaccination in Humans

    Brian D. Livingston;Jeff Alexander;Claire Crimi;Carla Oseroff

  • Measurement of MHC/peptide interactions by gel filtration or monoclonal antibody capture.

    John Sidney;Scott Southwood;Carrie Moore;Carla Oseroff

Frequent Co-Authors

Alessandro Sette
Alessandro Sette La Jolla Institute For Allergy & Immunology
Bjoern Peters
Bjoern Peters La Jolla Institute For Allergy & Immunology
John Sidney
John Sidney La Jolla Institute For Allergy & Immunology
Howard M. Grey
Howard M. Grey La Jolla Institute For Allergy & Immunology
Scott Southwood
Scott Southwood Johnson & Johnson
Jason A. Greenbaum
Jason A. Greenbaum La Jolla Institute For Allergy & Immunology
David C. Tscharke
David C. Tscharke Australian National University
David H. Broide
David H. Broide University of California, San Diego
Jack R. Bennink
Jack R. Bennink National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
Michael J. Buchmeier
Michael J. Buchmeier University of California, Irvine

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Immunology in the USA opens doors to various related healthcare careers, including nursing and mental health specialties. For those interested in nursing, exploring the easiest LPN programs to get into can be a practical starting point. These programs often provide a quicker pathway to entering the healthcare workforce.

If you're aiming to advance your practice, considering the what is the easiest NP program can help you choose a program that balances accessibility with high-quality education. Nurse Practitioner degrees often lead to more specialized roles, especially in mental health care.

For those interested in psychiatric nursing, identifying the top psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner programs online ensures access to quality clinical experiences, which are vital for career advancement.

Affordability is also a key consideration. Exploring the affordable PMHNP programs can help prospective students find quality education options without excessive financial burden.

Best Scientists Citing Carla Oseroff

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles