World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Plant Science and Agronomy 42 3429 3201 860 770 114 7447

Bryan A. Bailey publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Bryan A. Bailey between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Bryan A. Bailey published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 3.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 10 publications in 2024. 14 of the 135 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 10. Peak 10 publications in 2024. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 2 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 1 publication 2004: 4 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 3 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 4 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 5 publications 2021: 2 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 4 publications
1989 2025

135 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Bryan A. Bailey: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 1
1991 2
1992 3
1993 2
1994 2
1995 2
1996 0
1997 6
1998 3
1999 2
2000 5
2001 3
2002 2
2003 1
2004 4
2005 5
2006 2
2007 5
2008 7
2009 5
2010 3
2011 5
2012 4
2013 4
2014 4
2015 7
2016 4
2017 2
2018 3
2019 5
2020 5
2021 2
2022 6
2023 4
2024 10
2025 4
Total 135
Download as CSV

Bryan A. Bailey publication distribution in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bryan A. Bailey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 467+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 255. Most scientists, 255, have 111–115 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–115 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 2 scientists 41–45 publications: 7 scientists 46–50 publications: 40 scientists 51–55 publications: 58 scientists 56–60 publications: 60 scientists 61–65 publications: 107 scientists 66–70 publications: 130 scientists 71–75 publications: 153 scientists 76–80 publications: 191 scientists 81–85 publications: 199 scientists 86–90 publications: 206 scientists 91–95 publications: 218 scientists 96–100 publications: 226 scientists 101–105 publications: 227 scientists 106–110 publications: 247 scientists 111–115 publications: 255 scientists 116–120 publications: 253 scientists 121–125 publications: 233 scientists 126–130 publications: 219 scientists 131–135 publications: 201 scientists 136–140 publications: 194 scientists 141–145 publications: 176 scientists 146–150 publications: 157 scientists 151–155 publications: 147 scientists 156–160 publications: 151 scientists 161–165 publications: 159 scientists 166–170 publications: 137 scientists 171–175 publications: 128 scientists 176–180 publications: 126 scientists 181–185 publications: 98 scientists 186–190 publications: 114 scientists 191–195 publications: 100 scientists 196–200 publications: 90 scientists 201–205 publications: 71 scientists 206–210 publications: 98 scientists 211–215 publications: 70 scientists 216–220 publications: 86 scientists 221–225 publications: 61 scientists 226–230 publications: 58 scientists 231–235 publications: 53 scientists 236–240 publications: 64 scientists 241–245 publications: 39 scientists 246–250 publications: 46 scientists 251–255 publications: 51 scientists 256–260 publications: 36 scientists 261–265 publications: 44 scientists 266–270 publications: 35 scientists 271–275 publications: 30 scientists 276–280 publications: 33 scientists 281–285 publications: 35 scientists 286–290 publications: 36 scientists 291–295 publications: 26 scientists 296–300 publications: 26 scientists 301–305 publications: 31 scientists 306–310 publications: 30 scientists 311–315 publications: 21 scientists 316–320 publications: 29 scientists 321–325 publications: 14 scientists 326–330 publications: 15 scientists 331–335 publications: 15 scientists 336–340 publications: 17 scientists 341–345 publications: 15 scientists 346–350 publications: 12 scientists 351–355 publications: 17 scientists 356–360 publications: 18 scientists 361–365 publications: 12 scientists 366–370 publications: 11 scientists 371–375 publications: 6 scientists 376–380 publications: 6 scientists 381–385 publications: 11 scientists 386–390 publications: 9 scientists 391–395 publications: 10 scientists 396–400 publications: 8 scientists 401–405 publications: 4 scientists 406–410 publications: 9 scientists 411–415 publications: 11 scientists 416–420 publications: 4 scientists 421–425 publications: 7 scientists 426–430 publications: 4 scientists 431–435 publications: 3 scientists 436–440 publications: 5 scientists 441–445 publications: 8 scientists 446–450 publications: 6 scientists 451–455 publications: 7 scientists 456–460 publications: 5 scientists 461–465 publications: 6 scientists 466 publications: 2 scientists 467+ publications: 99 scientists
36–40 publications 467+

This scientist: 114 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 467 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 2
41–45 7
46–50 40
51–55 58
56–60 60
61–65 107
66–70 130
71–75 153
76–80 191
81–85 199
86–90 206
91–95 218
96–100 226
101–105 227
106–110 247
111–115 255 114
116–120 253
121–125 233
126–130 219
131–135 201
136–140 194
141–145 176
146–150 157
151–155 147
156–160 151
161–165 159
166–170 137
171–175 128
176–180 126
181–185 98
186–190 114
191–195 100
196–200 90
201–205 71
206–210 98
211–215 70
216–220 86
221–225 61
226–230 58
231–235 53
236–240 64
241–245 39
246–250 46
251–255 51
256–260 36
261–265 44
266–270 35
271–275 30
276–280 33
281–285 35
286–290 36
291–295 26
296–300 26
301–305 31
306–310 30
311–315 21
316–320 29
321–325 14
326–330 15
331–335 15
336–340 17
341–345 15
346–350 12
351–355 17
356–360 18
361–365 12
366–370 11
371–375 6
376–380 6
381–385 11
386–390 9
391–395 10
396–400 8
401–405 4
406–410 9
411–415 11
416–420 4
421–425 7
426–430 4
431–435 3
436–440 5
441–445 8
446–450 6
451–455 7
456–460 5
461–465 6
466 2
467+ 99
Download as CSV

Bryan A. Bailey D-index placement in Plant Science and Agronomy in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bryan A. Bailey sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 80 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 109+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 34 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 42 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 200 scientists 31 D-Index: 236 scientists 32 D-Index: 253 scientists 33 D-Index: 283 scientists 34 D-Index: 288 scientists 35 D-Index: 240 scientists 36 D-Index: 246 scientists 37 D-Index: 243 scientists 38 D-Index: 247 scientists 39 D-Index: 229 scientists 40 D-Index: 232 scientists 41 D-Index: 230 scientists 42 D-Index: 228 scientists 43 D-Index: 219 scientists 44 D-Index: 193 scientists 45 D-Index: 164 scientists 46 D-Index: 158 scientists 47 D-Index: 143 scientists 48 D-Index: 131 scientists 49 D-Index: 127 scientists 50 D-Index: 122 scientists 51 D-Index: 122 scientists 52 D-Index: 110 scientists 53 D-Index: 102 scientists 54 D-Index: 98 scientists 55 D-Index: 79 scientists 56 D-Index: 85 scientists 57 D-Index: 88 scientists 58 D-Index: 91 scientists 59 D-Index: 62 scientists 60 D-Index: 61 scientists 61 D-Index: 59 scientists 62 D-Index: 54 scientists 63 D-Index: 61 scientists 64 D-Index: 59 scientists 65 D-Index: 58 scientists 66 D-Index: 41 scientists 67 D-Index: 49 scientists 68 D-Index: 39 scientists 69 D-Index: 32 scientists 70 D-Index: 40 scientists 71 D-Index: 47 scientists 72 D-Index: 38 scientists 73 D-Index: 28 scientists 74 D-Index: 29 scientists 75 D-Index: 28 scientists 76 D-Index: 22 scientists 77 D-Index: 21 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 26 scientists 80 D-Index: 19 scientists 81 D-Index: 16 scientists 82 D-Index: 12 scientists 83 D-Index: 16 scientists 84 D-Index: 14 scientists 85 D-Index: 11 scientists 86 D-Index: 17 scientists 87 D-Index: 13 scientists 88 D-Index: 10 scientists 89 D-Index: 12 scientists 90 D-Index: 18 scientists 91 D-Index: 16 scientists 92 D-Index: 16 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 12 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 9 scientists 97 D-Index: 9 scientists 98 D-Index: 11 scientists 99 D-Index: 12 scientists 100 D-Index: 5 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 4 scientists 103 D-Index: 11 scientists 104 D-Index: 5 scientists 105 D-Index: 9 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 4 scientists 108 D-Index: 8 scientists 109+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 109+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 109 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Plant Science and Agronomy scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 6,494 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 200
31 236
32 253
33 283
34 288
35 240
36 246
37 243
38 247
39 229
40 232
41 230
42 228 42
43 219
44 193
45 164
46 158
47 143
48 131
49 127
50 122
51 122
52 110
53 102
54 98
55 79
56 85
57 88
58 91
59 62
60 61
61 59
62 54
63 61
64 59
65 58
66 41
67 49
68 39
69 32
70 40
71 47
72 38
73 28
74 29
75 28
76 22
77 21
78 25
79 26
80 19
81 16
82 12
83 16
84 14
85 11
86 17
87 13
88 10
89 12
90 18
91 16
92 16
93 17
94 12
95 8
96 9
97 9
98 11
99 12
100 5
101 8
102 4
103 11
104 5
105 9
106 7
107 4
108 8
109+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • Enzyme

His primary scientific interests are in Botany, Theobroma, Biochemistry, Moniliophthora roreri and Trichoderma. His study in the fields of Moniliophthora perniciosa under the domain of Botany overlaps with other disciplines such as Caffeine synthase. His work deals with themes such as Gene expression, Chitinase, Peroxidase, Glucanase and Methyl jasmonate, which intersect with Theobroma.

His work in the fields of Biochemistry, such as Biosynthesis and Nicotiana tabacum, overlaps with other areas such as Arabidopsis thaliana and Osmoprotectant. His Trichoderma research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Endophyte and Antibiosis. His work carried out in the field of Endophyte brings together such families of science as Expressed sequence tag and Seedling.

His most cited work include:

  • The beneficial endophyte Trichoderma hamatum isolate DIS 219b promotes growth and delays the onset of the drought response in Theobroma cacao (279 citations)
  • Fungal and plant gene expression during the colonization of cacao seedlings by endophytic isolates of four Trichoderma species (191 citations)
  • Antibiosis, mycoparasitism, and colonization success for endophytic Trichoderma isolates with biological control potential in Theobroma cacao (131 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Botany, Theobroma, Horticulture, Moniliophthora roreri and Gene are his primary areas of study. His Botany research includes themes of Plant defense against herbivory and Colonization. His studies deal with areas such as Endophyte, Genetic diversity, Phytophthora, Trichoderma and Seedling as well as Theobroma.

Bryan A. Bailey has researched Horticulture in several fields, including Corn oil, Pathogen and Agronomy. His Moniliophthora roreri research includes elements of Plant disease resistance, Moniliophthora perniciosa and Microbiology, Spore. The Gene study combines topics in areas such as Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis and Cultivar.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Botany (44.66%)
  • Theobroma (31.07%)
  • Horticulture (22.33%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2013-2021)?

  • Theobroma (31.07%)
  • Phytophthora (15.53%)
  • Moniliophthora roreri (18.45%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

Bryan A. Bailey mainly investigates Theobroma, Phytophthora, Moniliophthora roreri, Genetics and Horticulture. His research integrates issues of Oomycete, Fungicide and Genetic diversity in his study of Theobroma. His studies examine the connections between Phytophthora and genetics, as well as such issues in Inoculation, with regards to Virulence.

Bryan A. Bailey interconnects Plant disease resistance, Moniliophthora perniciosa and Germination in the investigation of issues within Moniliophthora roreri. His Phytophthora palmivora study necessitates a more in-depth grasp of Botany. He combines subjects such as Plant defense against herbivory and Internal transcribed spacer with his study of Botany.

Between 2013 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Genome and secretome analysis of the hemibiotrophic fungal pathogen, Moniliophthora roreri, which causes frosty pod rot disease of cacao: mechanisms of the biotrophic and necrotrophic phases (71 citations)
  • Phytophthora megakarya and Phytophthora palmivora, closely related causal agents of cacao black pod rot, underwent increases in genome sizes and gene numbers by different mechanisms (38 citations)
  • PCR-based identification of cacao black pod causal agents and identification of biological factors possibly contributing to Phytophthora megakarya's field dominance in West Africa (23 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Gene
  • Botany
  • Enzyme

Bryan A. Bailey focuses on Theobroma, Phytophthora megakarya, Phytophthora palmivora, Phytophthora and Gene. He studies Moniliophthora, a branch of Theobroma. The concepts of his Phytophthora study are interwoven with issues in Mycology and Broom.

His Gene research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Moniliophthora roreri and Microbiology. Bryan A. Bailey has included themes like Moniliophthora perniciosa and Botany in his Plant defense against herbivory study. His Botany study frequently draws parallels with other fields, such as Inoculation.

Best Publications

  • Role of Cover Crops in Improving Soil and Row Crop Productivity

    N. K. Fageria;V. C. Baligar;B. A. Bailey

  • The beneficial endophyte Trichoderma hamatum isolate DIS 219b promotes growth and delays the onset of the drought response in Theobroma cacao

    Hanhong Bae;Richard C. Sicher;Moon S. Kim;Soo-Hyung Kim

  • Fungal and plant gene expression during the colonization of cacao seedlings by endophytic isolates of four Trichoderma species.

    B. A. Bailey;H. Bae;M. D. Strem;D. P. Roberts

  • Antibiosis, mycoparasitism, and colonization success for endophytic Trichoderma isolates with biological control potential in Theobroma cacao

    B.A. Bailey;H. Bae;M.D. Strem;J. Crozier

  • Endophytic Trichoderma isolates from tropical environments delay disease onset and induce resistance against Phytophthora capsici in hot pepper using multiple mechanisms.

    Hanhong Bae;Daniel P. Roberts;Hyoun-Sub Lim;Mary D. Strem

  • Purification of a protein from culture filtrates of Fusarium oxysporum that induces ethylene and necrosis in leaves of Erythroxylum coca.

    Bryan A. Bailey

  • Moniliophthora perniciosa, the causal agent of witches' broom disease of cacao: what's new from this old foe?

    Lyndel W. Meinhardt;Johana Rincones;Bryan A. Bailey;M. Catherine Aime

  • Bacterial endophytes: Bacillus spp. from annual crops as potential biological control agents of black pod rot of cacao

    Rachel L. Melnick;Nina K. Zidack;Bryan A. Bailey;Siela N. Maximova

  • Induction of Ethylene Biosynthesis in Nicotiana tabacum by a Trichoderma viride Xylanase Is Correlated to the Accumulation of 1-Aminocyclopropane-1-Carboxylic Acid (ACC) Synthase and ACC Oxidase Transcripts

    Adi Avni;Bryan A. Bailey;Autar K. Mattoo;James D. Anderson

  • The Impact of Plant Diseases on World Chocolate Production

    John H. Bowers;Bryan A. Bailey;Prakash K. Hebbar;Soumaila Sanogo

  • An Ethylene Biosynthesis-Inducing Endoxylanase Elicits Electrolyte Leakage and Necrosis in Nicotiana tabacum cv Xanthi Leaves

    Bryan A. Bailey;Jeffrey F. D. Dean;James D. Anderson

  • A genome survey of Moniliophthora perniciosa gives new insights into Witches' Broom Disease of cacao

    Jorge M.C. Mondego;Marcelo F. Carazzolle;Gustavo G.L. Costa;Eduardo F. Formighieri

  • Exogenous trehalose alters Arabidopsis transcripts involved in cell wall modification, abiotic stress, nitrogen metabolism, and plant defense

    Hanhong Bae;Eliot Herman;Bryan Bailey;Hyeun Jong Bae

  • The drought response of Theobroma cacao (cacao) and the regulation of genes involved in polyamine biosynthesis by drought and other stresses

    Hanhong Bae;Soo Hyung Kim;Moon S. Kim;Richard C. Sicher

  • Necrosis- and ethylene-inducing peptide from Fusarium oxysporum induces a complex cascade of transcripts associated with signal transduction and cell death in Arabidopsis.

    Hanhong Bae;Moon S. Kim;Richard C. Sicher;Hyeun-Jong Bae

  • Isolation of endophytic endospore-forming bacteria from Theobroma cacao as potential biological control agents of cacao diseases

    Rachel L. Melnick;Carmen Suárez;Bryan A. Bailey;Paul A. Backman

  • Genome and secretome analysis of the hemibiotrophic fungal pathogen, Moniliophthora roreri, which causes frosty pod rot disease of cacao: mechanisms of the biotrophic and necrotrophic phases

    Lyndel W. Meinhardt;Gustavo Gilson Lacerda Costa;Daniela P. T. Thomazella;Paulo Jose P. L. Teixeira

  • Colonization of cacao seedlings by Trichoderma stromaticum, a mycoparasite of the witches’ broom pathogen, and its influence on plant growth and resistance

    J.T. De Souza;J.T. De Souza;B.A. Bailey;A.W.V. Pomella;E.F. Erbe

  • Responses of growth and primary metabolism of water-stressed barley roots to rehydration

    Richard C. Sicher;Dennis Timlin;Bryan Bailey

  • Isolation of ESTs from cacao (Theobroma cacao L.) leaves treated with inducers of the defense response.

    Joseph A. Verica;Siela N. Maximova;Mary D. Strem;John E. Carlson

  • Gene expression in leaves of Theobroma cacao in response to mechanical wounding, ethylene, and/or methyl jasmonate

    Bryan A. Bailey;Mary D. Strem;Hanhong Bae;Gabriela Antunez de Mayolo

  • Trichoderma species form endophytic associations within Theobroma cacao trichomes.

    Bryan A. Bailey;Mary D. Strem;Delilah Wood

  • Phytophthora megakarya and Phytophthora palmivora, closely related causal agents of cacao black pod rot, underwent increases in genome sizes and gene numbers by different mechanisms

    Shahin S. Ali;Jonathan Shao;David J. Lary;Brent A. Kronmiller

  • Altered Gene Expression in Three Plant Species in Response to Treatment with Nep1, a Fungal Protein That Causes Necrosis

    Sarah E. Keates;Todd A. Kostman;James D. Anderson;Bryan A. Bailey

  • Alterations in Nicotiana tabacum L. cv Xanthi Cell Membrane Function following Treatment with an Ethylene Biosynthesis-Inducing Endoxylanase

    Bryan A. Bailey;Ronald F. Korcak;James D. Anderson

Frequent Co-Authors

Hanhong Bae
Hanhong Bae Yeungnam University
Richard C. Sicher
Richard C. Sicher Agricultural Research Service
Mark J. Guiltinan
Mark J. Guiltinan Pennsylvania State University
R. D. Lumsden
R. D. Lumsden US Department of Agriculture
John E. Carlson
John E. Carlson Pennsylvania State University
Brett M. Tyler
Brett M. Tyler Oregon State University
Gary J. Samuels
Gary J. Samuels United States Department of Agriculture
Piotr A. Mieczkowski
Piotr A. Mieczkowski University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Daniel P. Roberts
Daniel P. Roberts US Department of Agriculture
Perry B. Cregan
Perry B. Cregan United States Department of Agriculture

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Bryan A. Bailey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles