World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
45
Citations
9427
World Ranking
6637
National Ranking
3603

Brian P. Ackerman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian P. Ackerman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 115 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Brian P. Ackerman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Brian P. Ackerman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 45 D-Index — 43rd percentile

43% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Brian P. Ackerman is affiliated with the University of Delaware in the United States. Their academic profile reflects involvement in research within a university setting, implying engagement with teaching, research, and potentially collaborative projects typical of a research institution environment.

There are no recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues documented for Brian P. Ackerman. The absence of these entries suggests limited publicly available information about their research output or collaborative networks at this time.

Information on main fields and subfields of study, as well as specific topics of work, is also not available. This limits the insight into particular areas of expertise or specialized research themes that Brian P. Ackerman might focus on.

No book publications or awards have been recorded in the available data, therefore there is no documented history of book authorship or formal recognitions associated with their academic career.

The profile indicates that Brian P. Ackerman is currently living. Thus, their research and academic contributions may still be ongoing or forthcoming.

Best Publications

  • Emotion Knowledge as a Predictor of Social Behavior and Academic Competence in Children at Risk

    Carroll Izard;Sarah Fine;David Schultz;Allison Mostow

  • Emotions and emotion regulation in developmental psychopathology

    Dante Cicchetti;Brian P. Ackerman;Carroll E. Izard

  • Emotion knowledge in economically disadvantaged children: Self-regulatory antecedents and relations to social difficulties and withdrawal

    David Schultz;Carroll E. Izard;Brian P. Ackerman;Eric Arden Youngstrom

  • Family Instability and the Problem Behaviors of Children From Economically Disadvantaged Families

    Brian P. Ackerman;Jen Kogos;Eric Youngstrom;Kristen Schoff

  • Accelerating the development of emotion competence in Head Start children: Effects on adaptive and maladaptive behavior

    Carroll E. Izard;Kristen A. King;Christopher J. Trentacosta;Judith K. Morgan

  • A processing resource account of age differences in recall.

    Jan C. Rabinowitz;Fergus I. M. Craik;Brian P. Ackerman

  • Dysphoria-related bias in maternal ratings of children

    Eric Youngstrom;Carroll Izard;Brian Ackerman

  • First grade emotion knowledge as a predictor of fifth grade self-reported internalizing behaviors in children from economically disadvantaged families.

    Sarah E. Fine;Carroll E. Izard;Allison J. Mostow;Christopher J. Trentacosta

  • Form and function in children's understanding of ironic utterances☆

    Brian P. Ackerman

  • The relations between persistent poverty and contextual risk and children's behavior in elementary school.

    Brian P. Ackerman;Eleanor D. Brown;Carroll E. Izard

  • The Relations between Contextual Risk, Earned Income, and the School Adjustment of Children from Economically Disadvantaged Families.

    Brian P. Ackerman;Eleanor D. Brown;Carroll E. Izard

  • Contextual Risk, Caregiver Emotionality, and the Problem Behaviors of Six- and Seven-Year-Old Children from Economically Disadvantaged Families.

    Brian P. Ackerman;Carroll E. Izard;Kristen Schoff;Eric A. Youngstrom

  • Self-Organization of Discrete Emotions, Emotion Patterns, and Emotion-Cognition Relations

    Carroll E. Izard;Brian P. Ackerman;Kristen M. Schoff;Sarah E. Fine

  • Aging and Metamemory: The Roles of Relatedness and Imagery.

    Jan C. Rabinowitz;Brian P. Ackerman;Fergus I. M. Craik;Janet L. Hinchley

  • On comprehending idioms: Do children get the picture?

    Brian P. Ackerman

  • Children’s Anger Attribution Bias: Relations to Family Environment and Social Adjustment

    David Schultz;Carroll E. Izard;Brian P. Ackerman

  • Young Children's Understanding of a Speaker's Intentional Use of a False Utterance

    Brian P. Ackerman

  • The Effect of Semantic Context on Children's Word Recognition.

    Roger Schvaneveldt;Brian P. Ackerman;Teddy Semlear

  • Continuity and Change in Levels of Externalizing Behavior in School of Children From Economically Disadvantaged Families

    Brian P. Ackerman;Eleanor Brown;Carroll E. Izard

  • Relation Between Reading Problems and Internalizing Behavior in School for Preadolescent Children From Economically Disadvantaged Families

    Brian P. Ackerman;Carroll E. Izard;Roger Kobak;Eleanor D. Brown

Frequent Co-Authors

Carroll E. Izard
Carroll E. Izard University of Delaware
Eric A. Youngstrom
Eric A. Youngstrom University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Fergus I. M. Craik
Fergus I. M. Craik University of Toronto
Dante Cicchetti
Dante Cicchetti University of Minnesota
Christopher J. Trentacosta
Christopher J. Trentacosta Wayne State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in studying Psychology, there are several related online degrees and career pathways to consider. Social work is one of the most popular fields for those with a background in psychology, offering meaningful opportunities to support individuals and communities. Many accredited programs across the USA offer online social work degrees, often with flexible options for part-time or full-time study.

Cost is a key consideration for many prospective students. If you are seeking affordable social work degrees in New York City, there are reputable institutions offering practical programs for less. Similarly, students searching for the cheapest social work programs in New Jersey can find excellent, budget-friendly options in the state.

Those based elsewhere in the US should explore affordable social work programs in Nevada and look into the most affordable social work degree programs in Ohio as cost-effective pathways to a rewarding career. Whichever state or pathway you choose, an online degree in a related field can open doors to impactful roles in counseling, social services, or therapy.

Best Scientists Citing Brian P. Ackerman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles