World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Wanda J. Orlikowski

Wanda J. Orlikowski

D-Index & Metrics

Business and Management

D-Index
71
Citations
84842
World Ranking
276
National Ranking
127

Computer Science

D-Index
65
Citations
72767
World Ranking
2379
National Ranking
1185

Wanda J. Orlikowski publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wanda J. Orlikowski sits on this spectrum.

35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientists 435 publications: 1 scientists 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35 publications 436+

This scientist: 187 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

Wanda J. Orlikowski D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wanda J. Orlikowski sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 71 D-Index — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management
  • Dean of Fellow, Academy of Management

Overview

Wanda J. Orlikowski is affiliated with MIT in the United States and focuses on research primarily within the social sciences. Their scholarly work spans several subfields including sociology and political science, communication, strategy and management, urban studies, and marketing.

The main topics of Orlikowski's research include information systems theories and implementation, innovation, technology and society, nonprofit sector and volunteering, public relations and crisis communication, knowledge management and sharing, cultural industries and urban development, and innovation and knowledge management.

Orlikowski has published multiple papers in various academic venues. Recent papers include:

  • The Digital Undertow: How the Corollary Effects of Digital Transformation Affect Industry Standards (2021) - Information Systems Research
  • Liminal innovation in practice: Understanding the reconfiguration of digital work in crisis (2021) - Information and Organization
  • The Digital Undertow and Institutional Displacement: A Sociomaterial Approach (2023) - Organization Theory

Other papers in the recent dataset, though authored by co-authors, are:

  • Crowd-Based Accountability: Examining How Social Media Commentary Reconfigures Organizational Accountability (2021) - Organization Science
  • Scale matters: doing practice-based studies of contemporary digital phenomena (2021) - Apollo (University of Cambridge)

Orlikowski frequently collaborates with several co-authors including Susan Scott, Arvind Karunakaran, Michael Barrett, Alan Zhang, and S. M. Scott.

Their work appears most often in the following publication venues:

  • Academy of Management Proceedings
  • Information and Organization
  • Information Systems Research
  • Organization Science
  • Organization Theory

Orlikowski has been recognized as a Dean of Fellow by the Academy of Management, an honor indicating a distinguished status among peers in their field.

Best Publications

  • The duality of technology: rethinking the concept of technology in organizations

    Wanda Janina Orlikowski

  • Studying Information Technology in Organizations: Research Approaches and Assumptions

    Wanda J. Orlikowski;Jack J. Baroudi

  • Using Technology and Constituting Structures: A Practice Lens for Studying Technology in Organizations

    Wanda J. Orlikowski

  • Learning from notes: organizational issues in groupware implementation

    Wanda J. Orlikowski

  • Knowing in Practice: Enacting a Collective Capability in Distributed Organizing

    Wanda J. Orlikowski

  • Research Commentary: Desperately Seeking the IT in IT Research--A Call to Theorizing the IT Artifact

    Wanda J. Orlikowski;C. Suzanne Iacono

  • Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work

    Wanda J. Orlikowski

  • Improvising Organizational Transformation Over Time: A Situated Change Perspective

    Wanda J. Orlikowski

  • 10 Sociomateriality: Challenging the Separation of Technology, Work and Organization

    Wanda J. Orlikowski;Susan V. Scott

  • Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations

    Wanda J. Orlikowski;Debra C. Gash

  • CASE tools as organizational change: investigating incremental and radical changes in systems development

    Wanda J. Orlikowski

  • Theorizing Practice and Practicing Theory

    Martha S. Feldman;Wanda J. Orlikowski

  • Genres of Organizational Communication: A Structurational Approach to Studying Communication and Media

    Joanne Yates;Wanda J. Orlikowski

  • Information Technology and the Structuring of Organizations

    Wanda J. Orlikowski;Daniel Robey

  • Learning from Notes: organizational issues in groupware implementation

    Wanda J. Orlikowski

  • Learning from notes: organizational issues in groupware implementation

    Wanda J. Orlikowski

  • Genre Repertoire: The Structuring of Communicative Practices in Organizations

    Wanda J. Orlikowski;JoAnne Yates

  • Technology and institutions: what can research on information technology and research on organizations learn from each other?

    Wanda J. Orlikowski;Stephen R. Barley

  • Windows of Opportunity: Temporal Patterns of Technological Adaptation in Organizations

    Marcie J. Tyre;Wanda J. Orlikowski

  • The sociomateriality of organisational life: considering technology in management research

    Wanda J. Orlikowski

  • It's About Time: Temporal Structuring in Organizations

    Wanda J. Orlikowski;JoAnne Yates

  • The autonomy paradox: : The implications of mobile email devices for knowledge professionals

    Melissa Mazmanian;Wanda J. Orlikowski;JoAnne Yates

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael Barrett
Michael Barrett University of Cambridge
Sarah Kaplan
Sarah Kaplan University of Toronto
Geoff Walsham
Geoff Walsham University of Cambridge
Stephen R. Barley
Stephen R. Barley Stanford University
Loizos Heracleous
Loizos Heracleous University of Warwick
Richard J. Boland
Richard J. Boland Case Western Reserve University
Soon Ang
Soon Ang Nanyang Technological University
Davide Nicolini
Davide Nicolini University of Warwick

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Business and Management in the USA opens a wide range of online learning opportunities across different industries. For those interested in the construction field, construction management degrees offer accelerated online options, focusing on project planning, budgeting, and leadership.

If you prefer the healthcare industry, you might explore an online degree for healthcare administration to help develop key skills in healthcare operations, finance, and human resources. Fast-tracked pathways are increasingly popular, allowing students to complete their studies quicker than traditional programs. Discover more about fast track college programs to see how you can accelerate your career ambitions.

Affordability is a major concern for many. Thankfully, you can pursue quality education while keeping costs down by researching the cheapest business administration degree online options available in the USA. These programs make it more accessible for everyone to build a strong foundation in business or management—setting the stage for a versatile career.

Best Scientists Citing Wanda J. Orlikowski

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles