World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Timothy M. Clay

Timothy M. Clay

D-Index & Metrics

Immunology

D-Index
50
Citations
10415
World Ranking
4225
National Ranking
1926

Timothy M. Clay publication distribution in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Immunology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy M. Clay sits on this spectrum.

62–71 publications: 9 scientists 72–81 publications: 23 scientists 82–91 publications: 40 scientists 92–101 publications: 72 scientists 102–111 publications: 86 scientists 112–121 publications: 108 scientists 122–131 publications: 150 scientists 132–141 publications: 160 scientists 142–151 publications: 159 scientists 152–161 publications: 189 scientists 162–171 publications: 166 scientists 172–181 publications: 181 scientists 182–191 publications: 188 scientists 192–201 publications: 187 scientists 202–211 publications: 178 scientists 212–221 publications: 158 scientists 222–231 publications: 168 scientists 232–241 publications: 159 scientists 242–251 publications: 160 scientists 252–261 publications: 148 scientists 262–271 publications: 116 scientists 272–281 publications: 125 scientists 282–291 publications: 115 scientists 292–301 publications: 111 scientists 302–311 publications: 95 scientists 312–321 publications: 97 scientists 322–331 publications: 97 scientists 332–341 publications: 99 scientists 342–351 publications: 96 scientists 352–361 publications: 68 scientists 362–371 publications: 76 scientists 372–381 publications: 71 scientists 382–391 publications: 71 scientists 392–401 publications: 62 scientists 402–411 publications: 54 scientists 412–421 publications: 41 scientists 422–431 publications: 63 scientists 432–441 publications: 53 scientists 442–451 publications: 31 scientists 452–461 publications: 42 scientists 462–471 publications: 40 scientists 472–481 publications: 29 scientists 482–491 publications: 34 scientists 492–501 publications: 30 scientists 502–511 publications: 23 scientists 512–521 publications: 41 scientists 522–531 publications: 29 scientists 532–541 publications: 28 scientists 542–551 publications: 16 scientists 552–561 publications: 18 scientists 562–571 publications: 18 scientists 572–581 publications: 17 scientists 582–591 publications: 17 scientists 592–601 publications: 17 scientists 602–611 publications: 19 scientists 612–621 publications: 13 scientists 622–631 publications: 12 scientists 632–641 publications: 11 scientists 642–651 publications: 16 scientists 652–661 publications: 9 scientists 662–671 publications: 5 scientists 672–681 publications: 13 scientists 682–691 publications: 12 scientists 692–701 publications: 6 scientists 702–711 publications: 6 scientists 712–721 publications: 9 scientists 722–731 publications: 9 scientists 732–741 publications: 6 scientists 742–751 publications: 11 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 7 scientists 772–781 publications: 12 scientists 782–791 publications: 7 scientists 792–801 publications: 5 scientists 802–806 publications: 1 scientists 807+ publications: 100 scientists
62 publications 807+

This scientist: 145 publications — 14th percentile

14% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 807 publications or more.

Timothy M. Clay D-index placement in Immunology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Immunology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy M. Clay sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 28 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 91 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 157 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 192 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 175 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 188 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 177 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 155 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 194 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 201 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 197 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 201 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 173 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 167 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 172 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 199 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 184 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 133 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 162 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 125 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 121 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 102 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 96 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 75 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 74 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 66 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 68 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 60 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 54 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 36 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 23 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 52 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 41 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 34 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 25 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 28 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 11 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 19 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 20 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 17 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 14 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 15 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 9 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 11 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 9 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 7 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 7 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 5 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156 D-Index: 6 scientists 157+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 157+

This scientist: 50 D-Index — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 157 D-Index or more.

Overview

Timothy M. Clay is affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their academic profile reflects a focus on research activities associated with this institution.

Information regarding recent papers, co-authors, and publication venues for Timothy M. Clay is not available, indicating that detailed records of their research output in terms of individual articles or frequent collaborators have not been provided.

There are no listed book publications under their name, nor specific documented fields or subfields of study related to their work. Likewise, there is no additional data available on the specific topics frequently addressed in their research.

No awards or honors have been recorded for Timothy M. Clay, and there is no indication that they are deceased.

This profile is constructed based solely on the available data points without extrapolation or assumptions beyond the documented facts.

Best Publications

  • A phase I study of dexosome immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

    Michael A Morse;Jennifer Garst;Takuya Osada;Shubi Khan

  • Efficient Transfer of a Tumor Antigen-Reactive TCR to Human Peripheral Blood Lymphocytes Confers Anti-Tumor Reactivity

    Timothy M. Clay;Mary C. Custer;Jessica Sachs;Patrick Hwu

  • Depletion of human regulatory T cells specifically enhances antigen-specific immune responses to cancer vaccines

    Michael A. Morse;Amy C. Hobeika;Takuya Osada;Delila Serra

  • The effect of anti-VEGF therapy on immature myeloid cell and dendritic cells in cancer patients

    Takuya Osada;Gabriel Chong;Robert Tansik;Timothy Hong

  • Antihelminth Compound Niclosamide Downregulates Wnt Signaling and Elicits Antitumor Responses in Tumors with Activating APC Mutations

    Takuya Osada;Minyong Chen;Xiao Yi Yang;Ivan Spasojevic

  • Investigation of HIFU-induced anti-tumor immunity in a murine tumor model

    Zhenlin Hu;Xiao Yi Yang;Yunbo Liu;Georgy N Sankin

  • Identification of epitope mimics recognized by CTL reactive to the melanoma/melanocyte-derived peptide MART-1((27-35))

    Douglas J. Loftus;Chiara Castelli;Timothy M. Clay;Paola Squarcina

  • Assays for monitoring cellular immune responses to active immunotherapy of cancer.

    T M Clay;A C Hobeika;P J Mosca;H K Lyerly

  • Immunotherapy with Autologous, Human Dendritic Cells Transfected with Carcinoembryonic Antigen mRNA

    Michael A. Morse;Smita K. Nair;Paul J. Mosca M.D.;Amy C. Hobeika

  • Results and harmonization guidelines from two large-scale international Elispot proficiency panels conducted by the Cancer Vaccine Consortium (CVC/SVI)

    Sylvia Janetzki;Katherine S. Panageas;Leah Ben-Porat;Jean Boyer

  • Increasing vaccine potency through exosome antigen targeting

    Zachary C. Hartman;Junping Wei;Oliver K. Glass;Hongtao Guo

  • CSPG4 Protein as a New Target for the Antibody-Based Immunotherapy of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer

    Xinhui Wang;Takuya Osada;Yangyang Wang;Ling Yu

  • Evasion of immune responses to introduced human acid α-glucosidase by liver-restricted expression in glycogen storage disease type II

    Luis M. Franco;Baodong Sun;Xiaoyi Yang;Andrew Bird

  • A subset of human monocyte-derived dendritic cells expresses high levels of interleukin-12 in response to combined CD40 ligand and interferon-γ treatment

    Paul J. Mosca;Amy C. Hobeika;Timothy M. Clay;Smita K. Nair

  • A Randomized Phase II Study of Immunization With Dendritic Cells Modified With Poxvectors Encoding CEA and MUC1 Compared With the Same Poxvectors Plus GM-CSF for Resected Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

    Michael A. Morse;Donna Niedzwiecki;John L. Marshall;Christopher Garrett

  • Preoperative Mobilization of Circulating Dendritic Cells by Flt3 Ligand Administration to Patients With Metastatic Colon Cancer

    Michael A. Morse;Smita Nair;Monica Fernandez-Casal;Yuping Deng

  • Maximizing the retention of antigen specific lymphocyte function after cryopreservation

    Mary L. Disis;Corazon dela Rosa;Vivian Goodell;Ling-Yu Kuan

  • Impact of cryopreservation on tetramer, cytokine flow cytometry, and ELISPOT

    Holden T Maecker;James Moon;Sonny Bhatia;Smita A Ghanekar

  • Adenovirus Infection Triggers a Rapid, MyD88-Regulated Transcriptome Response Critical to Acute-Phase and Adaptive Immune Responses In Vivo

    Zachary C. Hartman;Anne Kiang;Ruth S. Everett;Delila Serra

  • Phase I Study of Immunization with Dendritic Cells Modified with Fowlpox Encoding Carcinoembryonic Antigen and Costimulatory Molecules

    Michael A. Morse;Timothy M. Clay;Amy C. Hobeika;Takuya Osada

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael A. Morse
Michael A. Morse Duke University
H. Kim Lyerly
H. Kim Lyerly Duke University
Donna Niedzwiecki
Donna Niedzwiecki Duke University
Andrea Amalfitano
Andrea Amalfitano Michigan State University
Michael I. Nishimura
Michael I. Nishimura Loyola University Chicago
Holden T. Maecker
Holden T. Maecker Stanford University
Mary L. Disis
Mary L. Disis University of Washington
Vernon C. Maino
Vernon C. Maino Becton Dickinson (United States)
Steven A. Rosenberg
Steven A. Rosenberg National Institutes of Health
Smita Nair
Smita Nair Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in Immunology, pursuing related healthcare degrees can open diverse career pathways. Many students transition into specialized nursing roles, such as acute care, which requires an acute care certification for FNP. This certification allows nurse practitioners to handle critical patient care, making it a valuable credential for immunology professionals focused on patient outcomes.

Accelerated programs provide a faster route to becoming a nurse practitioner. Exploring the accelerated NP program options is ideal for those aiming to expedite their education and enter the workforce sooner without compromising quality.

For individuals without a nursing background, the best online BSN programs for non nurses serve as a foundation, combining flexible online coursework with practical skills to enter the nursing field, which often intersects with immunology in clinical settings.

If admission competitiveness is a concern, the easiest ABSN program to get into provides accessible pathways for motivated students to begin their nursing education quickly and efficiently, opening doors to careers that complement immunology expertise.

Best Scientists Citing Timothy M. Clay

Trending Scientists