World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
54
Citations
19353
World Ranking
15361
National Ranking
111

Tiina Mattila-Sandholm publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tiina Mattila-Sandholm sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 130 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Tiina Mattila-Sandholm D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tiina Mattila-Sandholm sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tiina Mattila-Sandholm is affiliated with the VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, located in Finland. This affiliation highlights their involvement with an institution known for applied scientific research and technological development.

Their academic profile currently does not list specific recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues. Consequently, detailed information on collaborative patterns or publication trends is not available.

No book publications or awards have been documented in the current data, which limits insight into contributions beyond original research articles or recognized accolades.

Similarly, there are no specified main fields, subfields, or topics of study associated with their work in the available information, which restricts identification of particular subject areas or research focuses.

Despite the lack of detailed research output data, the position at VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland suggests a focus on research with practical and technological applications, consistent with the center's mission to advance innovation and development in various scientific and industrial domains.

Best Publications

  • Characterization of the action of selected essential oil components on gram-negative bacteria

    Ilkka M. Helander;Hanna-Leena Alakomi;Kyösti Latva-Kala;Tiina Mattila-Sandholm

  • Probiotic bacteria: safety, functional and technological properties

    Maria Saarela;Gunnar Mogensen;Rangne Fondén;Jaana Mättö

  • LACTIC ACID PERMEABILIZES GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA BY DISRUPTING THE OUTER MEMBRANE

    Hanna-Leena Alakomi;Eija Skyttä;Maria Saarela;Tiina Mattila-Sandholm

  • Demonstration of safety of probiotics — a review

    S. Salminen;L. Morelli;P. Marteau

  • Technological challenges for future probiotic foods

    Tiina Mattila-Sandholm;Päivi Myllärinen;Ross Crittenden;G. Mogensen

  • Comparative genomic analysis of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG reveals pili containing a human- mucus binding protein

    Matti Kankainen;Lars Paulin;Soile Tynkkynen;Ingemar von Ossowski

  • Persistence of Colonization of Human Colonic Mucosa by a Probiotic Strain, Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG, after Oral Consumption

    Minna Alander;Reetta Satokari;Riitta Korpela;Maija Saxelin

  • New types of antimicrobial compounds produced by Lactobacillus plantarum

    Marja-Leena Niku-Paavola;Arja Laitila;Tiina Mattila-Sandholm;Auli Haikara

  • Gut bacteria and health foods--the European perspective.

    Maria Saarela;Liisa Lähteenmäki;Ross Crittenden;Seppo Salminen

  • Sources of Listeria monocytogenes contamination in a cold-smoked rainbow trout processing plant detected by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis typing

    Tiina Autio;Sebastian Hielm;Maria Miettinen;Anna-Maija Sjöberg

  • In vitro fermentation of cereal dietary fibre carbohydrates by probiotic and intestinal bacteria

    Ross Crittenden;Ross Crittenden;Sirpa Karppinen;Suvi Ojanen;Maija Tenkanen

  • Oat β-glucan and xylan hydrolysates as selective substrates for Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus strains

    Johanna Jaskari;Pia Kontula;A. Siitonen;Hannele Jousimies-Somer

  • Biofilm formation in the industry: A review

    Tiina Mattila‐Sandholm;Gun Wirtanen

  • Development of functional ingredients for gut health

    Riitta Puupponen-Pimiä;Anna-Marja Aura;Kirsi-Marja Oksman-Caldentey;Päivi Myllärinen

  • Comparison of Ribotyping, Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA Analysis, and Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis in Typing of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and L. casei Strains

    Soile Tynkkynen;Reetta Satokari;Maria Saarela;Tiina Mattila-Sandholm

  • Bioprotectives and probiotics for dry sausages

    Susanna Työppönen;Esko Petäjä;Tiina Mattila-Sandholm

  • Adhesion of bifidobacteria to granular starch and its implications in probiotic technologies.

    R. Crittenden;A. Laitila;P. Forssell;J. Mättö

  • Effect of galacto-oligosaccharide supplementation on human faecal microflora and on survival and persistence of Bifidobacterium lactis Bb-12 in the gastrointestinal tract

    M. Alander;J. Mättö;W. Kneifel;M. Johansson

  • The effect of probiotic strains on the microbiota of the Simulator of the Human Intestinal Microbial Ecosystem (SHIME)

    M Alander;I De Smet;L Nollet;W Verstraete

  • The technology of probiotics

    M. Saxelin;B. Grenov;U. Svensson;R. Fonden

Frequent Co-Authors

Seppo Salminen
Seppo Salminen University of Turku
Maria Saarela
Maria Saarela VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
Kaisa Poutanen
Kaisa Poutanen VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
Lorenzo Morelli
Lorenzo Morelli Catholic University of the Sacred Heart
Timo K. Korhonen
Timo K. Korhonen University of Helsinki
Reetta Satokari
Reetta Satokari University of Helsinki
Arthur C. Ouwehand
Arthur C. Ouwehand DuPont (United States)
Maija Tenkanen
Maija Tenkanen University of Helsinki
Mirja Salkinoja-Salonen
Mirja Salkinoja-Salonen University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens the door to diverse, in-demand career paths. Many students transition to fields like nursing, dietetics, or advanced healthcare practice by taking advantage of flexible online programs.

For those aspiring to advance quickly in nursing, the shortest pmhnp certificate program or the 12-month fnp program online can provide a fast-track to specialized nursing roles. Current registered nurses looking to boost qualifications may consider engaging, flexible rn to bsn programs designed for working professionals.

Nutrition and health science students might pursue licensure as dietitians, benefitting from the best online registered dietitian programs for affordability and convenience.

Whether seeking clinical paths, research, or health-focused roles, these online programs support flexible career advancement in the sciences, making them an excellent next step after a degree in Biology or Biochemistry.

Best Scientists Citing Tiina Mattila-Sandholm

Recently Published Articles