World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
79
Citations
24102
World Ranking
4278
National Ranking
34

Maria Saarela publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria Saarela sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 441 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Maria Saarela D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Maria Saarela sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Maria Saarela is affiliated with the VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland in Finland. Their research primarily spans the field of Agricultural and Biological Sciences, with 199 publications contributing to this area.

Within this broad domain, their work focuses extensively on Food Science, reflected in 145 related publications. Other significant subfields include Plant Science, Nutrition and Dietetics, Economics and Econometrics, and Molecular Biology. These areas highlight a multidisciplinary approach to agricultural research and biological sciences.

The scientist's research covers specific topics such as:

  • Agricultural safety and regulations
  • Pesticide Residue Analysis and Safety
  • Genetically Modified Organisms Research
  • Vitamin K Research Studies
  • Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
  • Intellectual Property and Patents

Maria Saarela has contributed to several peer-reviewed journals, with a notable presence in the EFSA Journal, where 94 of their publications appear. Other venues associated with their work include Acta Diabetologica, Livestock Science, Insects, and EU Research.

Recent representative papers from their portfolio include:

  • Diets naturally rich in polyphenols and/or long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids differently affect microbiota composition in high-cardiometabolic-risk individuals, 2020, Acta Diabetologica
  • Safety and efficacy of BioWorma® (Duddingtonia flagrans NCIMB 30336) as a feed additive for all grazing animals, 2020, EFSA Journal
  • Effect of silage juice feeding on pig production performance, meat quality and gut microbiome, 2021, Livestock Science
  • Safety and efficacy of l-lysine monohydrochloride and l-lysine sulfate produced using Corynebacterium glutamicum CGMCC 7.266 for all animal species, 2020, EFSA Journal
  • Safety and efficacy of Bacillus subtilisPB6 (Bacillus velezensisATCC PTA-6737) as a feed additive for chickens for fattening, chickens reared for laying, minor poultry species (except for laying purposes), ornamental, sporting and game birds, 2020, EFSA Journal

Their frequent collaborators include Baltasar Mayo, Henrik Christensen, Giovanna Azimonti, Birgit Dusemund, and Marta López-Alonso, each contributing extensively to joint research efforts spanning numerous studies.

Best Publications

  • Probiotic bacteria: safety, functional and technological properties

    Maria Saarela;Gunnar Mogensen;Rangne Fondén;Jaana Mättö

  • LACTIC ACID PERMEABILIZES GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA BY DISRUPTING THE OUTER MEMBRANE

    Hanna-Leena Alakomi;Eija Skyttä;Maria Saarela;Tiina Mattila-Sandholm

  • Guidance on the characterisation of microorganisms used as feed additives or as production organisms

    Efsa Panel on Additives;Guido Rychen;Gabriele Aquilina

  • Technological challenges for future probiotic foods

    Tiina Mattila-Sandholm;Päivi Myllärinen;Ross Crittenden;G. Mogensen

  • Analysis of the Fecal Microbiota of Irritable Bowel Syndrome Patients and Healthy Controls with Real-Time PCR

    Erja Malinen;Teemu Rinttilä;Kajsa Kajander;Jaana Mättö

  • Contribution of diet to the composition of the human gut microbiota.

    Daniela Graf;Raffaella Di Cagno;Frida Fåk;Harry J Flint

  • Bifidobacterial Diversity in Human Feces Detected by Genus-Specific PCR and Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis

    Reetta M. Satokari;Elaine E. Vaughan;Antoon D. L. Akkermans;Maria Saarela

  • Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the target species

    Efsa Panel on Additives;Guido Rychen;Gabriele Aquilina

  • Guidance on the assessment of the safety of feed additives for the consumer.

    Efsa Panel on Additives;Guido Rychen;Gabriele Aquilina

  • Guidance on the identity, characterisation and conditions of use of feed additives.

    Guido Rychen;Gabriele Aquilina;Giovanna Azimonti;Vasileios Bampidis

  • Gut bacteria and health foods--the European perspective.

    Maria Saarela;Liisa Lähteenmäki;Ross Crittenden;Seppo Salminen

  • Guidance on the assessment of the efficacy of feed additives.

    Guido Rychen;Gabriele Aquilina;Giovanna Azimonti;Vasileios Bampidis

  • In vitro fermentation of cereal dietary fibre carbohydrates by probiotic and intestinal bacteria

    Ross Crittenden;Ross Crittenden;Sirpa Karppinen;Suvi Ojanen;Maija Tenkanen

  • Recommendations for the viability assessment of probiotics as concentrated cultures and in food matrices.

    Claude P. Champagne;R. Paul Ross;Maria Saarela;Ken Flemming Hansen

  • Composition and temporal stability of gastrointestinal microbiota in irritable bowel syndrome — a longitudinal study in IBS and control subjects

    Jaana Mättö;Liisa Maunuksela;Kajsa Kajander;Kajsa Kajander;Airi Palva

  • Analysis of microbiota in first episode psychosis identifies preliminary associations with symptom severity and treatment response

    Emanuel Schwarz;Johanna Maukonen;Tiina Hyytiäinen;Tuula Kieseppä

  • Development of functional ingredients for gut health

    Riitta Puupponen-Pimiä;Anna-Marja Aura;Kirsi-Marja Oksman-Caldentey;Päivi Myllärinen

  • Comparison of Ribotyping, Randomly Amplified Polymorphic DNA Analysis, and Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis in Typing of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and L. casei Strains

    Soile Tynkkynen;Reetta Satokari;Maria Saarela;Tiina Mattila-Sandholm

  • Frequency and stability of mono- or poly-infection by Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans serotypes a, b, c, d or e.

    M. Saarela;S. Asikainen;S. Alaluusua;L. Pyhälä

  • Adhesion of bifidobacteria to granular starch and its implications in probiotic technologies.

    R. Crittenden;A. Laitila;P. Forssell;J. Mättö

Frequent Co-Authors

Sirkka Asikainen
Sirkka Asikainen Umeå University
Hannele Jousimies-Somer
Hannele Jousimies-Somer Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare
Jaakko Kaprio
Jaakko Kaprio University of Helsinki
Tiina Mattila-Sandholm
Tiina Mattila-Sandholm VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
Robert A. Rastall
Robert A. Rastall University of Reading
Glenn R. Gibson
Glenn R. Gibson University of Reading
Eija Könönen
Eija Könönen University of Turku
Kirsi H. Pietiläinen
Kirsi H. Pietiläinen University of Helsinki
Matej Orešič
Matej Orešič Örebro University
Aila Rissanen
Aila Rissanen University of Helsinki

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Biology and Biochemistry in the USA opens doors to diverse online degree options and career pathways. For those interested in the applied sciences, consider fitness degrees online. These programs blend biology, physiology, and practical knowledge for careers in fitness, coaching, and wellness management.

Exploring the broader field of human movement? Kinesiology online programs offer flexible study for careers spanning athletic training, physical therapy, and exercise research. Both health and wellness sectors highly value these skills.

If you’re considering advanced practice in healthcare, additional certifications can lead to specialized roles. The shortest pmhnp program enables quick entry into psychiatric mental health nurse practitioner roles, combining clinical biology with mental healthcare expertise.

Additionally, those holding a nursing master’s degree might pursue a post masters fnp certification to broaden their clinical and leadership opportunities. These pathways build upon core biochemistry principles and help meet the rising demand for healthcare professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Maria Saarela

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles