World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 60 3197 32 142 9457

Hannele Jousimies-Somer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Hannele Jousimies-Somer between 1984 and 2005, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Hannele Jousimies-Somer published across 22 years, from 1984 to 2005, averaging 7.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 1997. 7 of the 156 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1984 to 2005. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 1997. 1984: 3 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 7 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 14 publications 1994: 10 publications 1995: 9 publications 1996: 12 publications 1997: 17 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 17 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 5 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 8 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 2 publications
1984 2005

156 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Hannele Jousimies-Somer: publications per year, 1984 to 2005
Year Publications
1984 3
1985 0
1986 3
1987 2
1988 7
1989 4
1990 2
1991 2
1992 8
1993 14
1994 10
1995 9
1996 12
1997 17
1998 6
1999 17
2000 12
2001 5
2002 8
2003 8
2004 5
2005 2
Total 156
Download as CSV

Hannele Jousimies-Somer publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hannele Jousimies-Somer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 135–144 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 142 publications — 22nd percentile

22% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288 142
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Hannele Jousimies-Somer D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Hannele Jousimies-Somer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 44th percentile

44% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139 60
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Hannele Jousimies-Somer was affiliated with the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare in Finland. Their academic and research activities focused primarily within this institution during their career.

No records of recent papers, frequent co-authors, publication venues, book publications, or detailed fields and subfields of study were available from the provided data.

There were no listed main topics or subjects specifically associated with their research efforts in the accessible information.

Similarly, there were no awards or recognitions registered in the available data to detail any honors received during their professional life.

Hannele Jousimies-Somer is recorded as deceased.

Best Publications

  • Liver abscess due to a Lactobacillus rhamnosus strain indistinguishable from L. rhamnosus strain GG.

    Merja Rautio;Hannele Jousimies-Somer;Heikki Kauma;Ilmo Pietarinen

  • Increased salivary acetaldehyde levels in heavy drinkers and smokers: a microbiological approach to oral cavity cancer

    Nils Homann;Jyrki Tillonen;Jukka H. Meurman;Hanna Rintamäki

  • High acetaldehyde levels in saliva after ethanol consumption: methodological aspects and pathogenetic implications.

    Nils Homann;Hannele Jousimies-Somer;Kalle Jokelainen;Riitta Heine

  • Oat β-glucan and xylan hydrolysates as selective substrates for Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus strains

    Johanna Jaskari;Pia Kontula;A. Siitonen;Hannele Jousimies-Somer

  • Age, Dental Infections, and Coronary Heart Disease:

    K.J. Mattila;S. Asikainen;J. Wolf;H. Jousimies-Somer

  • Frequency and stability of mono- or poly-infection by Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans serotypes a, b, c, d or e.

    M. Saarela;S. Asikainen;S. Alaluusua;L. Pyhälä

  • Reclassification of Bacteroides putredinis (Weinberg et al., 1937) in a new genus Alistipes gen. nov., as Alistipes putredinis comb. nov., and description of Alistipes finegoldii sp. nov., from human sources.

    Merja Rautio;Erkki Eerola;Marja-Liisa Väisänen-Tunkelrott;Denise Molitoris

  • Detection of Porphyromonas gingivalis from saliva by PCR by using a simple sample-processing method.

    Jaana Mättö;Maria Saarela;Satu Alaluusua;Virva Oja

  • Oral colonization by more than one clonal type of mutans streptococcus in children with nursing-bottle dental caries

    S. Alaluusua;J. Mättö;L. Grönroos;S. Innilä

  • Establishment of Oral Anaerobes during the First Year of Life

    E. Könönen;A. Kanervo;A. Takala;S. Asikainen

  • The oral gram-negative anaerobic microflora in young children: longitudinal changes from edentulous to dentate mouth.

    E. Könönen;S. Asikainen;M. Saarela;J. Karjalainen

  • Role of Yeasts in the Salivary Acetaldehyde Production From Ethanol Among Risk Groups for Ethanol-Associated Oral Cavity Cancer

    J. Tillonen;N. Homann;M. Rautio;H. Jousimies-Somer

  • Transmission of oral bacterial species between spouses

    M. Saarela;B. Troll-Lindén;H. Torkko;A.-M. Stucki

  • A Retrospective Review of Cases of Anaerobic Empyema and Update of Bacteriology

    R. Civen;H. Jousimies-Somer;M. Marina;L. Borenstein

  • Differences between patients with or without the need for intensive care due to severe odontogenic infections.

    Seija Ylijoki;Riitta Suuronen;Hannele Jousimies-Somer;Jukka H. Meurman

  • Distribution and genetic analysis of oral Prevotella intermedia and Prevotella nigrescens

    J Mättö;M Saarela;B von Troil-Lindén;E Könönen

  • Salivary Levels of Suspected Periodontal Pathogens in Relation to Periodontal Status and Treatment

    B. von Troil-Lindén;H. Torkko;S. Alaluusua;H. Jousimies-Somer

  • Bacteriology of histopathologically defined appendicitis in children

    Merja Rautio;Harri Saxén;Anja Siitonen;Risto Nikku

  • In vitro alcohol dehydrogenase-mediated acetaldehyde production by aerobic bacteria representing the normal colonic flora in man.

    K. Jokelainen;A. Siitonen;H. Jousimies‐Somer;T. Nosova

  • The early colonization of gram-negative anaerobic bacteria in edentulous infants

    E. Könönen;S. Asikainen;H. Jousimies-Somer

Frequent Co-Authors

Sirkka Asikainen
Sirkka Asikainen Umeå University
Eija Könönen
Eija Könönen University of Turku
Maria Saarela
Maria Saarela VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
Sydney M. Finegold
Sydney M. Finegold University of California, Los Angeles
Anja Siitonen
Anja Siitonen Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare (THL)
Pentti Huovinen
Pentti Huovinen University of Turku
Erkki Eerola
Erkki Eerola University of Turku
Jukka H. Meurman
Jukka H. Meurman University of Helsinki
Daria N. Love
Daria N. Love University of Sydney
Jari Jalava
Jari Jalava Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can open doors to various career pathways connected to microbiology. For individuals with unique backgrounds, understanding what is the best degree for a convicted felon is crucial in selecting a program that supports reentry into the workforce with opportunities for growth.

One promising path is becoming a functional medicine nurse, which combines knowledge of biological sciences with patient-centered care. This degree emphasizes holistic health approaches, making it a great complement to microbiology studies.

Alternatively, those interested in the administrative side of healthcare may pursue certification as a cpc medical coding salary professionals highlights the demand and financial viability of this career, which involves managing patient data accurately and efficiently.

Finally, careers like a health information manager salary reflect the importance of overseeing health data systems—roles that blend microbiology knowledge with information technology skills, offering strong job stability and growth.

Best Scientists Citing Hannele Jousimies-Somer

Recently Published Articles